This series corrects MMC pin pull-up/pull-down configurations across
TI AM62L EVM, AM62P SK, & AM62 LP SK boards to properly match their
hardware design.

Most boards have external pull-ups on MMC pins, but DT configuration
was also enabling internal pulls. Having both internal and external
pulls active causes several issues:
- Unnecessary power consumption due to stronger pull resistance
- Floating pins violating SPEC recommendations

All changes are based on the respective board schematics referenced
in each patch.

Changes since v1:
- improved all commit descriptions
- removed incorrect claim: potential issues for modes with tighter
  timing requirements due to mismatched pull strengths between D0 and
  remaining data pins
- drop patch 2/4. While there is a host side mismatch between D0 and
  D1-D7 pins, leaving internal pullup on D0 equals a stronger pull,
  helping with poor board design issues and better matching D0 pullup
  strength with D1-D7 after taking into account eMMC card pullups on
  D1-D7 pins
- rebased against ti-k3-dts-next

Link to v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260212184246.2316659-1-jm@ti.com/

Judith Mendez (3):
  arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p5-sk: Disable MMC1 internal pulls on data pins
  arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62l-evm: Disable MMC1 internal pulls on data pins
  arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62-lp-sk: Enable internal pulls for MMC0 data
    pins

 arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62-lp-sk.dts | 14 +++++++-------
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62l3-evm.dts |  6 +++---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p5-sk.dts  |  6 +++---
 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

-- 
2.52.0

Hi Judith Mendez,

On Mon, 23 Feb 2026 17:37:28 -0600, Judith Mendez wrote:
> This series corrects MMC pin pull-up/pull-down configurations across
> TI AM62L EVM, AM62P SK, & AM62 LP SK boards to properly match their
> hardware design.
> 
> Most boards have external pull-ups on MMC pins, but DT configuration
> was also enabling internal pulls. Having both internal and external
> pulls active causes several issues:
> - Unnecessary power consumption due to stronger pull resistance
> - Floating pins violating SPEC recommendations
> 
> [...]

I have applied the following to branch ti-k3-dts-next on [1].
Thank you!

[1/3] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p5-sk: Disable MMC1 internal pulls on data pins
      commit: 6d4441be969bea89bb9702781f5dfb3a8f2a02a4
[2/3] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62l-evm: Disable MMC1 internal pulls on data pins
      commit: 02532ba56362907b6aca3e8289c4a9247ef83325
[3/3] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62-lp-sk: Enable internal pulls for MMC0 data pins
      commit: ee2a9d9c9e6c9643fb7e45febcaedfbc038e483a

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent up the chain during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a relevant bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ti/linux.git
--
Vignesh

Hello Judith,

On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 05:37:28PM -0600, Judith Mendez wrote:
> This series corrects MMC pin pull-up/pull-down configurations across
> TI AM62L EVM, AM62P SK, & AM62 LP SK boards to properly match their
> hardware design.

On AM62P the first mmc controller has no pinctrl, how is the situation
on this specific interface?

Francesco

Hi Francesco,

On 3/19/26 3:02 AM, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> Hello Judith,
> 
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 05:37:28PM -0600, Judith Mendez wrote:
>> This series corrects MMC pin pull-up/pull-down configurations across
>> TI AM62L EVM, AM62P SK, & AM62 LP SK boards to properly match their
>> hardware design.
> 
> On AM62P the first mmc controller has no pinctrl, how is the situation
> on this specific interface?

For AM62P, MM0 interface is a hardphy. We do not need pinmux nodes
for hardphys since there is nothing to configure, pins have one
purpose, and it cannot be changed.

~ Judith