ASAN reported a resource leak due to the bpf_object not being tracked
in test_sysctl. Add obj field to struct sysctl_test to properly clean
it up.

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_sysctl.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_sysctl.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_sysctl.c
index 273dd41ca09e..2a1ff821bc97 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_sysctl.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_sysctl.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ struct sysctl_test {
 		OP_EPERM,
 		SUCCESS,
 	} result;
+	struct bpf_object *obj;
 };
 
 static struct sysctl_test tests[] = {
@@ -1471,6 +1472,7 @@ static int load_sysctl_prog_file(struct sysctl_test *test)
 		return -1;
 	}
 
+	test->obj = obj;
 	return prog_fd;
 }
 
@@ -1573,6 +1575,7 @@ static int run_test_case(int cgfd, struct sysctl_test *test)
 	/* Detaching w/o checking return code: best effort attempt. */
 	if (progfd != -1)
 		bpf_prog_detach(cgfd, atype);
+	bpf_object__close(test->obj);
 	close(progfd);
 	printf("[%s]\n", err ? "FAIL" : "PASS");
 	return err;
-- 
2.53.0