[PATCH] fuse: refactor duplicate queue teardown operation

Yuto Ohnuki posted 1 patch 1 month, 3 weeks ago
fs/fuse/dev_uring.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
[PATCH] fuse: refactor duplicate queue teardown operation
Posted by Yuto Ohnuki 1 month, 3 weeks ago
Extract common queue iteration and teardown logic into
fuse_uring_teardown_all_queues() helper function to eliminate code
duplication between fuse_uring_async_stop_queues() and
fuse_uring_stop_queues().

This is a pure refactoring with no functional changes, intended to
improve maintainability.

Signed-off-by: Yuto Ohnuki <ytohnuki@amazon.com>
---
 fs/fuse/dev_uring.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev_uring.c b/fs/fuse/dev_uring.c
index 3a38b61aac26..7b9822e8837b 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/dev_uring.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dev_uring.c
@@ -397,6 +397,20 @@ static void fuse_uring_teardown_entries(struct fuse_ring_queue *queue)
 				     FRRS_AVAILABLE);
 }
 
+static void fuse_uring_teardown_all_queues(struct fuse_ring *ring)
+{
+	int qid;
+
+	for (qid = 0; qid < ring->nr_queues; qid++) {
+		struct fuse_ring_queue *queue = READ_ONCE(ring->queues[qid]);
+
+		if (!queue)
+			continue;
+
+		fuse_uring_teardown_entries(queue);
+	}
+}
+
 /*
  * Log state debug info
  */
@@ -431,19 +445,10 @@ static void fuse_uring_log_ent_state(struct fuse_ring *ring)
 
 static void fuse_uring_async_stop_queues(struct work_struct *work)
 {
-	int qid;
 	struct fuse_ring *ring =
 		container_of(work, struct fuse_ring, async_teardown_work.work);
 
-	/* XXX code dup */
-	for (qid = 0; qid < ring->nr_queues; qid++) {
-		struct fuse_ring_queue *queue = READ_ONCE(ring->queues[qid]);
-
-		if (!queue)
-			continue;
-
-		fuse_uring_teardown_entries(queue);
-	}
+	fuse_uring_teardown_all_queues(ring);
 
 	/*
 	 * Some ring entries might be in the middle of IO operations,
@@ -469,16 +474,7 @@ static void fuse_uring_async_stop_queues(struct work_struct *work)
  */
 void fuse_uring_stop_queues(struct fuse_ring *ring)
 {
-	int qid;
-
-	for (qid = 0; qid < ring->nr_queues; qid++) {
-		struct fuse_ring_queue *queue = READ_ONCE(ring->queues[qid]);
-
-		if (!queue)
-			continue;
-
-		fuse_uring_teardown_entries(queue);
-	}
+	fuse_uring_teardown_all_queues(ring);
 
 	if (atomic_read(&ring->queue_refs) > 0) {
 		ring->teardown_time = jiffies;
-- 
2.50.1




Amazon Web Services EMEA SARL, 38 avenue John F. Kennedy, L-1855 Luxembourg, R.C.S. Luxembourg B186284

Amazon Web Services EMEA SARL, Irish Branch, One Burlington Plaza, Burlington Road, Dublin 4, Ireland, branch registration number 908705
Re: [PATCH] fuse: refactor duplicate queue teardown operation
Posted by Miklos Szeredi 1 month, 2 weeks ago
On Mon, 23 Feb 2026 at 15:03, Yuto Ohnuki <ytohnuki@amazon.com> wrote:
>
> Extract common queue iteration and teardown logic into
> fuse_uring_teardown_all_queues() helper function to eliminate code
> duplication between fuse_uring_async_stop_queues() and
> fuse_uring_stop_queues().
>
> This is a pure refactoring with no functional changes, intended to
> improve maintainability.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yuto Ohnuki <ytohnuki@amazon.com>

Applied, thanks.

Miklos
Re: [PATCH] fuse: refactor duplicate queue teardown operation
Posted by Bernd Schubert 1 month, 2 weeks ago

On 2/23/26 15:03, Yuto Ohnuki wrote:
> Extract common queue iteration and teardown logic into
> fuse_uring_teardown_all_queues() helper function to eliminate code
> duplication between fuse_uring_async_stop_queues() and
> fuse_uring_stop_queues().
> 
> This is a pure refactoring with no functional changes, intended to
> improve maintainability.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yuto Ohnuki <ytohnuki@amazon.com>
> ---
>  fs/fuse/dev_uring.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev_uring.c b/fs/fuse/dev_uring.c
> index 3a38b61aac26..7b9822e8837b 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/dev_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/dev_uring.c
> @@ -397,6 +397,20 @@ static void fuse_uring_teardown_entries(struct fuse_ring_queue *queue)
>  				     FRRS_AVAILABLE);
>  }
>  
> +static void fuse_uring_teardown_all_queues(struct fuse_ring *ring)
> +{
> +	int qid;
> +
> +	for (qid = 0; qid < ring->nr_queues; qid++) {
> +		struct fuse_ring_queue *queue = READ_ONCE(ring->queues[qid]);
> +
> +		if (!queue)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		fuse_uring_teardown_entries(queue);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Log state debug info
>   */
> @@ -431,19 +445,10 @@ static void fuse_uring_log_ent_state(struct fuse_ring *ring)
>  
>  static void fuse_uring_async_stop_queues(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
> -	int qid;
>  	struct fuse_ring *ring =
>  		container_of(work, struct fuse_ring, async_teardown_work.work);
>  
> -	/* XXX code dup */
> -	for (qid = 0; qid < ring->nr_queues; qid++) {
> -		struct fuse_ring_queue *queue = READ_ONCE(ring->queues[qid]);
> -
> -		if (!queue)
> -			continue;
> -
> -		fuse_uring_teardown_entries(queue);
> -	}
> +	fuse_uring_teardown_all_queues(ring);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Some ring entries might be in the middle of IO operations,
> @@ -469,16 +474,7 @@ static void fuse_uring_async_stop_queues(struct work_struct *work)
>   */
>  void fuse_uring_stop_queues(struct fuse_ring *ring)
>  {
> -	int qid;
> -
> -	for (qid = 0; qid < ring->nr_queues; qid++) {
> -		struct fuse_ring_queue *queue = READ_ONCE(ring->queues[qid]);
> -
> -		if (!queue)
> -			continue;
> -
> -		fuse_uring_teardown_entries(queue);
> -	}
> +	fuse_uring_teardown_all_queues(ring);
>  
>  	if (atomic_read(&ring->queue_refs) > 0) {
>  		ring->teardown_time = jiffies;

Thank you! Looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Bernd Schubert <bernd@bsbernd.com>