[PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: add WIKO SAS

Paul Adam via B4 Relay posted 3 patches 1 month, 1 week ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: add WIKO SAS
Posted by Paul Adam via B4 Relay 1 month, 1 week ago
From: Paul Adam <adamp@posteo.de>

Wiko is a french smartphone company: https://wiko.com

Signed-off-by: Paul Adam <adamp@posteo.de>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
index edbce100cae4..187089eef983 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
@@ -1819,6 +1819,8 @@ patternProperties:
     description: Wi2Wi, Inc.
   "^widora,.*":
     description: Beijing Widora Technology Co., Ltd.
+  "^wiko,.*":
+    description: Wiko SAS
   "^wiligear,.*":
     description: Wiligear, Ltd.
   "^willsemi,.*":

-- 
2.53.0
Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: add WIKO SAS
Posted by Krzysztof Kozlowski 1 month, 1 week ago
On 21/02/2026 21:55, Paul Adam via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Paul Adam <adamp@posteo.de>
> 
> Wiko is a french smartphone company: https://wiko.com
> 


Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: add WIKO SAS
Posted by Krzysztof Kozlowski 1 month, 1 week ago
On Sat, Feb 21, 2026 at 09:55:39PM +0100, Paul Adam wrote:
> Wiko is a french smartphone company: https://wiko.com

Everything in Chinese, so not that much French company. Also footer says
after translation:

Copyright © Wuke Terminal Technology (Dongguan) Co., Ltd.
The main body number of the record: Guangdong ICP No. 2022057930

so for sure not French.

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: add WIKO SAS
Posted by Paul Adam 1 month, 1 week ago
On 26/02/23 11:25, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2026 at 09:55:39PM +0100, Paul Adam wrote:
> > Wiko is a french smartphone company: https://wiko.com
> 
> Everything in Chinese, so not that much French company. Also footer says
> after translation:
> 
> Copyright © Wuke Terminal Technology (Dongguan) Co., Ltd.
> The main body number of the record: Guangdong ICP No. 2022057930
> 
> so for sure not French.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 

Whats quite confusing to me is that both "wikomobile" and "wiko" use the brand
name "Wiko" and sell the same phones. 

But since my phone is from the french company, I can change it back to
"wikomobile" and adjust the binding accordingly.

I just want to mention that the offical/legal company name is
"Wiko, société par actions simplifiée" (Wiko, french type of business entity)

Best regards,
Paul
Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: add WIKO SAS
Posted by Krzysztof Kozlowski 1 month, 1 week ago
On 24/02/2026 15:26, Paul Adam wrote:
> On 26/02/23 11:25, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 21, 2026 at 09:55:39PM +0100, Paul Adam wrote:
>>> Wiko is a french smartphone company: https://wiko.com
>>
>> Everything in Chinese, so not that much French company. Also footer says
>> after translation:
>>
>> Copyright © Wuke Terminal Technology (Dongguan) Co., Ltd.
>> The main body number of the record: Guangdong ICP No. 2022057930
>>
>> so for sure not French.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
> 
> Whats quite confusing to me is that both "wikomobile" and "wiko" use the brand
> name "Wiko" and sell the same phones. 

It's just different branches. wiko.cn redirects to wiko.com

> 
> But since my phone is from the french company, I can change it back to
> "wikomobile" and adjust the binding accordingly.
> 
> I just want to mention that the offical/legal company name is
> "Wiko, société par actions simplifiée" (Wiko, french type of business entity)

I assumed that the Chinese part is rather the mother company, but page:
https://world.wikomobile.com/w-introduction-wiko
claims rather that French one, so it is actually fine.

Best regards,
Krzysztof