[PATCH bpf v2 14/15] selftests/bpf: Check BPFTOOL env var in detect_bpftool_path()

Ihor Solodrai posted 15 patches 1 month, 2 weeks ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH bpf v2 14/15] selftests/bpf: Check BPFTOOL env var in detect_bpftool_path()
Posted by Ihor Solodrai 1 month, 2 weeks ago
The bpftool_maps_access and bpftool_metadata tests may fail on BPF CI
with "command not found", depending on a workflow.
This happens because detect_bpftool_path() only checks two hardcoded
relative paths:
  - ./tools/sbin/bpftool
  - ../tools/sbin/bpftool

Add support for a BPFTOOL environment variable that allows specifying
the exact path to the bpftool binary.

Also replace strncpy() with snprintf() for proper null-termination.

Signed-off-by: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_helpers.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_helpers.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_helpers.c
index a5824945a4a5..d810e73da6c8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_helpers.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_helpers.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
 #include "bpftool_helpers.h"
+#include <stdio.h>
 #include <unistd.h>
 #include <string.h>
 #include <stdbool.h>
@@ -12,13 +13,24 @@
 static int detect_bpftool_path(char *buffer)
 {
 	char tmp[BPFTOOL_PATH_MAX_LEN];
+	const char *env_path;
+
+	/* First, check if BPFTOOL environment variable is set */
+	env_path = getenv("BPFTOOL");
+	if (env_path && access(env_path, X_OK) == 0) {
+		snprintf(buffer, BPFTOOL_PATH_MAX_LEN, "%s", env_path);
+		return 0;
+	} else if (env_path) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "bpftool '%s' doesn't exist or is not executable\n", env_path);
+		return 1;
+	}
 
 	/* Check default bpftool location (will work if we are running the
 	 * default flavor of test_progs)
 	 */
 	snprintf(tmp, BPFTOOL_PATH_MAX_LEN, "./%s", BPFTOOL_DEFAULT_PATH);
 	if (access(tmp, X_OK) == 0) {
-		strncpy(buffer, tmp, BPFTOOL_PATH_MAX_LEN);
+		snprintf(buffer, BPFTOOL_PATH_MAX_LEN, "%s", tmp);
 		return 0;
 	}
 
@@ -27,11 +39,11 @@ static int detect_bpftool_path(char *buffer)
 	 */
 	snprintf(tmp, BPFTOOL_PATH_MAX_LEN, "../%s", BPFTOOL_DEFAULT_PATH);
 	if (access(tmp, X_OK) == 0) {
-		strncpy(buffer, tmp, BPFTOOL_PATH_MAX_LEN);
+		snprintf(buffer, BPFTOOL_PATH_MAX_LEN, "%s", tmp);
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	/* Failed to find bpftool binary */
+	fprintf(stderr, "Failed to detect bpftool path, use BPFTOOL env var to override\n");
 	return 1;
 }
 
@@ -71,4 +83,3 @@ int get_bpftool_command_output(char *args, char *output_buf, size_t output_max_l
 {
 	return run_command(args, output_buf, output_max_len);
 }
-
-- 
2.53.0
Re: [PATCH bpf v2 14/15] selftests/bpf: Check BPFTOOL env var in detect_bpftool_path()
Posted by Alexei Starovoitov 1 month, 1 week ago
On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 4:31 PM Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> The bpftool_maps_access and bpftool_metadata tests may fail on BPF CI
> with "command not found", depending on a workflow.
> This happens because detect_bpftool_path() only checks two hardcoded
> relative paths:
>   - ./tools/sbin/bpftool
>   - ../tools/sbin/bpftool
>
> Add support for a BPFTOOL environment variable that allows specifying
> the exact path to the bpftool binary.
>
> Also replace strncpy() with snprintf() for proper null-termination.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_helpers.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_helpers.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_helpers.c
> index a5824945a4a5..d810e73da6c8 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_helpers.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_helpers.c
> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>  #include "bpftool_helpers.h"
> +#include <stdio.h>
>  #include <unistd.h>
>  #include <string.h>
>  #include <stdbool.h>
> @@ -12,13 +13,24 @@
>  static int detect_bpftool_path(char *buffer)
>  {
>         char tmp[BPFTOOL_PATH_MAX_LEN];
> +       const char *env_path;
> +
> +       /* First, check if BPFTOOL environment variable is set */
> +       env_path = getenv("BPFTOOL");
> +       if (env_path && access(env_path, X_OK) == 0) {
> +               snprintf(buffer, BPFTOOL_PATH_MAX_LEN, "%s", env_path);
> +               return 0;
> +       } else if (env_path) {
> +               fprintf(stderr, "bpftool '%s' doesn't exist or is not executable\n", env_path);
> +               return 1;
> +       }
>
>         /* Check default bpftool location (will work if we are running the
>          * default flavor of test_progs)
>          */
>         snprintf(tmp, BPFTOOL_PATH_MAX_LEN, "./%s", BPFTOOL_DEFAULT_PATH);
>         if (access(tmp, X_OK) == 0) {
> -               strncpy(buffer, tmp, BPFTOOL_PATH_MAX_LEN);
> +               snprintf(buffer, BPFTOOL_PATH_MAX_LEN, "%s", tmp);

I guess it's ok for user space, but

git log --oneline|grep "snprintf with strscpy"
ad789a85b163 mm/cma: replace snprintf with strscpy in cma_new_area
674fb053e95d sparc: vio: Replace snprintf with strscpy in vio_create_one
2dfc417414c6 genirq/proc: Replace snprintf with strscpy in register_handler_proc
f46ebb910989 block: Replace snprintf with strscpy in check_partition
b66215e7b780 media: verisilicon: replace snprintf with strscpy+strlcat
a86028f8e3ee staging: most: sound: replace snprintf with strscpy

and many others...
So.. should we introduce strscpy() in selftests/bpf ?
Re: [PATCH bpf v2 14/15] selftests/bpf: Check BPFTOOL env var in detect_bpftool_path()
Posted by Ihor Solodrai 1 month, 1 week ago
On 2/18/26 9:38 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 4:31 PM Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev> wrote:
>>
>> The bpftool_maps_access and bpftool_metadata tests may fail on BPF CI
>> with "command not found", depending on a workflow.
>> This happens because detect_bpftool_path() only checks two hardcoded
>> relative paths:
>>   - ./tools/sbin/bpftool
>>   - ../tools/sbin/bpftool
>>
>> Add support for a BPFTOOL environment variable that allows specifying
>> the exact path to the bpftool binary.
>>
>> Also replace strncpy() with snprintf() for proper null-termination.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
>> ---
>>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_helpers.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
>>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_helpers.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_helpers.c
>> index a5824945a4a5..d810e73da6c8 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_helpers.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_helpers.c
>> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
>>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>>  #include "bpftool_helpers.h"
>> +#include <stdio.h>
>>  #include <unistd.h>
>>  #include <string.h>
>>  #include <stdbool.h>
>> @@ -12,13 +13,24 @@
>>  static int detect_bpftool_path(char *buffer)
>>  {
>>         char tmp[BPFTOOL_PATH_MAX_LEN];
>> +       const char *env_path;
>> +
>> +       /* First, check if BPFTOOL environment variable is set */
>> +       env_path = getenv("BPFTOOL");
>> +       if (env_path && access(env_path, X_OK) == 0) {
>> +               snprintf(buffer, BPFTOOL_PATH_MAX_LEN, "%s", env_path);
>> +               return 0;
>> +       } else if (env_path) {
>> +               fprintf(stderr, "bpftool '%s' doesn't exist or is not executable\n", env_path);
>> +               return 1;
>> +       }
>>
>>         /* Check default bpftool location (will work if we are running the
>>          * default flavor of test_progs)
>>          */
>>         snprintf(tmp, BPFTOOL_PATH_MAX_LEN, "./%s", BPFTOOL_DEFAULT_PATH);
>>         if (access(tmp, X_OK) == 0) {
>> -               strncpy(buffer, tmp, BPFTOOL_PATH_MAX_LEN);
>> +               snprintf(buffer, BPFTOOL_PATH_MAX_LEN, "%s", tmp);
> 
> I guess it's ok for user space, but
> 
> git log --oneline|grep "snprintf with strscpy"
> ad789a85b163 mm/cma: replace snprintf with strscpy in cma_new_area
> 674fb053e95d sparc: vio: Replace snprintf with strscpy in vio_create_one
> 2dfc417414c6 genirq/proc: Replace snprintf with strscpy in register_handler_proc
> f46ebb910989 block: Replace snprintf with strscpy in check_partition
> b66215e7b780 media: verisilicon: replace snprintf with strscpy+strlcat
> a86028f8e3ee staging: most: sound: replace snprintf with strscpy
> 
> and many others...
> So.. should we introduce strscpy() in selftests/bpf ?

I guess we can, but:

$ grep -r 'snprintf(' --include="*.[ch]" tools/testing/selftests/bpf/ | wc -l
238

The reason to prefer strscpy() is speed, right?
Can we use kernel implementation in userspace directly?

In tools/include I only see this:

	#define strscpy strcpy

Re: [PATCH bpf v2 14/15] selftests/bpf: Check BPFTOOL env var in detect_bpftool_path()
Posted by Ihor Solodrai 1 month, 1 week ago
On 2/18/26 10:17 AM, Ihor Solodrai wrote:
> On 2/18/26 9:38 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 4:31 PM Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev> wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>         /* Check default bpftool location (will work if we are running the
>>>          * default flavor of test_progs)
>>>          */
>>>         snprintf(tmp, BPFTOOL_PATH_MAX_LEN, "./%s", BPFTOOL_DEFAULT_PATH);
>>>         if (access(tmp, X_OK) == 0) {
>>> -               strncpy(buffer, tmp, BPFTOOL_PATH_MAX_LEN);
>>> +               snprintf(buffer, BPFTOOL_PATH_MAX_LEN, "%s", tmp);
>>
>> I guess it's ok for user space, but
>>
>> git log --oneline|grep "snprintf with strscpy"
>> ad789a85b163 mm/cma: replace snprintf with strscpy in cma_new_area
>> 674fb053e95d sparc: vio: Replace snprintf with strscpy in vio_create_one
>> 2dfc417414c6 genirq/proc: Replace snprintf with strscpy in register_handler_proc
>> f46ebb910989 block: Replace snprintf with strscpy in check_partition
>> b66215e7b780 media: verisilicon: replace snprintf with strscpy+strlcat
>> a86028f8e3ee staging: most: sound: replace snprintf with strscpy
>>
>> and many others...
>> So.. should we introduce strscpy() in selftests/bpf ?
> 
> I guess we can, but:
> 
> $ grep -r 'snprintf(' --include="*.[ch]" tools/testing/selftests/bpf/ | wc -l
> 238
> 
> The reason to prefer strscpy() is speed, right?
> Can we use kernel implementation in userspace directly?
> 
> In tools/include I only see this:
> 
> 	#define strscpy strcpy
> 

I think we can add a simple implementation to tools/lib/string.c
See a diff below: essentially a copy from arch/s390/boot/string.c [1]

I suppose it's faster than snprintf(). However I am not sure about
going through all 238 usages, as that would touch many files. But at
least we can make actual strscpy available in selftests.

I can add this in v3. Alexei, wdyt?

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/s390/boot/string.c?h=v6.19#n32

diff --git a/tools/include/linux/string.h b/tools/include/linux/string.h
index 51ad3cf4fa82..ca183a0e846a 100644
--- a/tools/include/linux/string.h
+++ b/tools/include/linux/string.h
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 #define _TOOLS_LINUX_STRING_H_
 
 #include <linux/types.h>	/* for size_t */
+#include <sys/types.h>		/* for ssize_t */
 #include <string.h>
 
 void *memdup(const void *src, size_t len);
@@ -12,7 +13,7 @@ void argv_free(char **argv);
 
 int strtobool(const char *s, bool *res);
 
-#define strscpy strcpy
+ssize_t strscpy(char *dest, const char *src, size_t count);
 
 /*
  * glibc based builds needs the extern while uClibc doesn't.
diff --git a/tools/lib/string.c b/tools/lib/string.c
index 3126d2cff716..54c9163fa2b0 100644
--- a/tools/lib/string.c
+++ b/tools/lib/string.c
@@ -239,3 +239,17 @@ void *memchr_inv(const void *start, int c, size_t bytes)
 
 	return check_bytes8(start, value, bytes % 8);
 }
+
+ssize_t strscpy(char *dst, const char *src, size_t count)
+{
+	size_t len;
+
+	if (count == 0)
+		return -E2BIG;
+
+	len = strnlen(src, count - 1);
+	memcpy(dst, src, len);
+	dst[len] = '\0';
+
+	return src[len] ? -E2BIG : len;
+}


Re: [PATCH bpf v2 14/15] selftests/bpf: Check BPFTOOL env var in detect_bpftool_path()
Posted by Alexei Starovoitov 1 month, 1 week ago
On Wed, Feb 18, 2026 at 5:13 PM Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> On 2/18/26 10:17 AM, Ihor Solodrai wrote:
> > On 2/18/26 9:38 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 4:31 PM Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> [...]
> >>>
> >>>         /* Check default bpftool location (will work if we are running the
> >>>          * default flavor of test_progs)
> >>>          */
> >>>         snprintf(tmp, BPFTOOL_PATH_MAX_LEN, "./%s", BPFTOOL_DEFAULT_PATH);
> >>>         if (access(tmp, X_OK) == 0) {
> >>> -               strncpy(buffer, tmp, BPFTOOL_PATH_MAX_LEN);
> >>> +               snprintf(buffer, BPFTOOL_PATH_MAX_LEN, "%s", tmp);
> >>
> >> I guess it's ok for user space, but
> >>
> >> git log --oneline|grep "snprintf with strscpy"
> >> ad789a85b163 mm/cma: replace snprintf with strscpy in cma_new_area
> >> 674fb053e95d sparc: vio: Replace snprintf with strscpy in vio_create_one
> >> 2dfc417414c6 genirq/proc: Replace snprintf with strscpy in register_handler_proc
> >> f46ebb910989 block: Replace snprintf with strscpy in check_partition
> >> b66215e7b780 media: verisilicon: replace snprintf with strscpy+strlcat
> >> a86028f8e3ee staging: most: sound: replace snprintf with strscpy
> >>
> >> and many others...
> >> So.. should we introduce strscpy() in selftests/bpf ?
> >
> > I guess we can, but:
> >
> > $ grep -r 'snprintf(' --include="*.[ch]" tools/testing/selftests/bpf/ | wc -l
> > 238
> >
> > The reason to prefer strscpy() is speed, right?
> > Can we use kernel implementation in userspace directly?
> >
> > In tools/include I only see this:
> >
> >       #define strscpy strcpy
> >
>
> I think we can add a simple implementation to tools/lib/string.c
> See a diff below: essentially a copy from arch/s390/boot/string.c [1]
>
> I suppose it's faster than snprintf(). However I am not sure about
> going through all 238 usages, as that would touch many files. But at
> least we can make actual strscpy available in selftests.
>
> I can add this in v3. Alexei, wdyt?
>
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/s390/boot/string.c?h=v6.19#n32
>
> diff --git a/tools/include/linux/string.h b/tools/include/linux/string.h
> index 51ad3cf4fa82..ca183a0e846a 100644
> --- a/tools/include/linux/string.h
> +++ b/tools/include/linux/string.h
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
>  #define _TOOLS_LINUX_STRING_H_
>
>  #include <linux/types.h>       /* for size_t */
> +#include <sys/types.h>         /* for ssize_t */
>  #include <string.h>
>
>  void *memdup(const void *src, size_t len);
> @@ -12,7 +13,7 @@ void argv_free(char **argv);
>
>  int strtobool(const char *s, bool *res);
>
> -#define strscpy strcpy
> +ssize_t strscpy(char *dest, const char *src, size_t count);
>
>  /*
>   * glibc based builds needs the extern while uClibc doesn't.
> diff --git a/tools/lib/string.c b/tools/lib/string.c
> index 3126d2cff716..54c9163fa2b0 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/string.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/string.c
> @@ -239,3 +239,17 @@ void *memchr_inv(const void *start, int c, size_t bytes)
>
>         return check_bytes8(start, value, bytes % 8);
>  }
> +
> +ssize_t strscpy(char *dst, const char *src, size_t count)
> +{
> +       size_t len;
> +
> +       if (count == 0)
> +               return -E2BIG;
> +
> +       len = strnlen(src, count - 1);
> +       memcpy(dst, src, len);
> +       dst[len] = '\0';
> +
> +       return src[len] ? -E2BIG : len;
> +}

Hmm. it looks a bit like strlcpy() which is also not recommended.
See Documentation/process/deprecated.rst
that explains the reasons why strscpy() is the only "approved" version.

Also tools/lib/ is too scrutinized.
Let's take sized_strscpy() from lib/string.c
drop all optimizations like word a time, page boundary tricks, etc
and only keep essentially this:
        while (count > 1) {
                char c;

                c = src[res];
                dest[res] = c;
                if (!c)
                        return res;
                res++;
                count--;
        }

        /* Force NUL-termination. */
        dest[res] = '\0';

        /* Return E2BIG if the source didn't stop */
        return src[res] ? -E2BIG : res;

and add it somewhere in selftests/bpf..

and only use it in these couple cases where we need to fix strncpy.
Further snprintf() cleanup can be dealt with later.

I mainly want to avoid more churn when people will inevitably
start sending patches to replace snprintf with strscpy.
Re: [PATCH bpf v2 14/15] selftests/bpf: Check BPFTOOL env var in detect_bpftool_path()
Posted by Mykyta Yatsenko 1 month, 1 week ago
On 2/18/26 00:30, Ihor Solodrai wrote:
> The bpftool_maps_access and bpftool_metadata tests may fail on BPF CI
> with "command not found", depending on a workflow.
> This happens because detect_bpftool_path() only checks two hardcoded
> relative paths:
>    - ./tools/sbin/bpftool
>    - ../tools/sbin/bpftool
>
> Add support for a BPFTOOL environment variable that allows specifying
> the exact path to the bpftool binary.
>
> Also replace strncpy() with snprintf() for proper null-termination.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>
> ---
>   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_helpers.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
>   1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_helpers.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_helpers.c
> index a5824945a4a5..d810e73da6c8 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_helpers.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpftool_helpers.c
> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
>   // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>   #include "bpftool_helpers.h"
> +#include <stdio.h>
>   #include <unistd.h>
>   #include <string.h>
>   #include <stdbool.h>
> @@ -12,13 +13,24 @@
>   static int detect_bpftool_path(char *buffer)
>   {
>   	char tmp[BPFTOOL_PATH_MAX_LEN];
> +	const char *env_path;
> +
> +	/* First, check if BPFTOOL environment variable is set */
> +	env_path = getenv("BPFTOOL");
> +	if (env_path && access(env_path, X_OK) == 0) {
> +		snprintf(buffer, BPFTOOL_PATH_MAX_LEN, "%s", env_path);
> +		return 0;
> +	} else if (env_path) {
> +		fprintf(stderr, "bpftool '%s' doesn't exist or is not executable\n", env_path);
> +		return 1;
> +	}
>   
>   	/* Check default bpftool location (will work if we are running the
>   	 * default flavor of test_progs)
>   	 */
>   	snprintf(tmp, BPFTOOL_PATH_MAX_LEN, "./%s", BPFTOOL_DEFAULT_PATH);
>   	if (access(tmp, X_OK) == 0) {
> -		strncpy(buffer, tmp, BPFTOOL_PATH_MAX_LEN);
> +		snprintf(buffer, BPFTOOL_PATH_MAX_LEN, "%s", tmp);
>   		return 0;
>   	}
>   
> @@ -27,11 +39,11 @@ static int detect_bpftool_path(char *buffer)
>   	 */
>   	snprintf(tmp, BPFTOOL_PATH_MAX_LEN, "../%s", BPFTOOL_DEFAULT_PATH);
>   	if (access(tmp, X_OK) == 0) {
> -		strncpy(buffer, tmp, BPFTOOL_PATH_MAX_LEN);
> +		snprintf(buffer, BPFTOOL_PATH_MAX_LEN, "%s", tmp);
>   		return 0;
>   	}
>   
> -	/* Failed to find bpftool binary */
> +	fprintf(stderr, "Failed to detect bpftool path, use BPFTOOL env var to override\n");
>   	return 1;
>   }
>   
> @@ -71,4 +83,3 @@ int get_bpftool_command_output(char *args, char *output_buf, size_t output_max_l
>   {
>   	return run_command(args, output_buf, output_max_len);
>   }
> -