drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c | 13 +++++++++---- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
cxl_memdev_autoremove() takes device_lock(&cxlmd->dev) via guard(device)
and then calls cxl_memdev_unregister() when the attach callback was
provided but cxl_mem_probe() failed to bind.
cxl_memdev_unregister() calls
cdev_device_del()
device_del()
bus_remove_device()
device_release_driver()
This path is reached when a driver uses the @attach parameter to
devm_cxl_add_memdev() and the CXL topology fails to enumerate (e.g.
DVSEC range registers decode outside platform-defined CXL ranges,
causing the endpoint port probe to fail).
Add cxl_memdev_attach_failed() to set the scope of the check correctly.
Fixes: 29317f8dc6ed ("cxl/mem: Introduce cxl_memdev_attach for CXL-dependent operation")
Signed-off-by: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
---
drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c | 13 +++++++++----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c b/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c
index af3d0cc65138..25ca4443e4f7 100644
--- a/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c
+++ b/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c
@@ -1089,10 +1089,8 @@ static int cxlmd_add(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd, struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds)
DEFINE_FREE(put_cxlmd, struct cxl_memdev *,
if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(_T)) put_device(&_T->dev))
-static struct cxl_memdev *cxl_memdev_autoremove(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd)
+static bool cxl_memdev_attach_failed(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd)
{
- int rc;
-
/*
* If @attach is provided fail if the driver is not attached upon
* return. Note that failure here could be the result of a race to
@@ -1100,7 +1098,14 @@ static struct cxl_memdev *cxl_memdev_autoremove(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd)
* succeeded and then cxl_mem unbound before the lock is acquired.
*/
guard(device)(&cxlmd->dev);
- if (cxlmd->attach && !cxlmd->dev.driver) {
+ return (cxlmd->attach && !cxlmd->dev.driver);
+}
+
+static struct cxl_memdev *cxl_memdev_autoremove(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd)
+{
+ int rc;
+
+ if (cxl_memdev_attach_failed(cxlmd)) {
cxl_memdev_unregister(cxlmd);
return ERR_PTR(-ENXIO);
}
--
2.53.0
On 2/11/26 12:22 PM, Gregory Price wrote:
> cxl_memdev_autoremove() takes device_lock(&cxlmd->dev) via guard(device)
> and then calls cxl_memdev_unregister() when the attach callback was
> provided but cxl_mem_probe() failed to bind.
>
> cxl_memdev_unregister() calls
> cdev_device_del()
> device_del()
> bus_remove_device()
> device_release_driver()
>
> This path is reached when a driver uses the @attach parameter to
> devm_cxl_add_memdev() and the CXL topology fails to enumerate (e.g.
> DVSEC range registers decode outside platform-defined CXL ranges,
> causing the endpoint port probe to fail).
>
> Add cxl_memdev_attach_failed() to set the scope of the check correctly.
>
> Fixes: 29317f8dc6ed ("cxl/mem: Introduce cxl_memdev_attach for CXL-dependent operation")
> Signed-off-by: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
Applied to cxl/fixes
318c58852e68
> ---
> drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c | 13 +++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c b/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c
> index af3d0cc65138..25ca4443e4f7 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c
> @@ -1089,10 +1089,8 @@ static int cxlmd_add(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd, struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds)
> DEFINE_FREE(put_cxlmd, struct cxl_memdev *,
> if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(_T)) put_device(&_T->dev))
>
> -static struct cxl_memdev *cxl_memdev_autoremove(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd)
> +static bool cxl_memdev_attach_failed(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd)
> {
> - int rc;
> -
> /*
> * If @attach is provided fail if the driver is not attached upon
> * return. Note that failure here could be the result of a race to
> @@ -1100,7 +1098,14 @@ static struct cxl_memdev *cxl_memdev_autoremove(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd)
> * succeeded and then cxl_mem unbound before the lock is acquired.
> */
> guard(device)(&cxlmd->dev);
> - if (cxlmd->attach && !cxlmd->dev.driver) {
> + return (cxlmd->attach && !cxlmd->dev.driver);
> +}
> +
> +static struct cxl_memdev *cxl_memdev_autoremove(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd)
> +{
> + int rc;
> +
> + if (cxl_memdev_attach_failed(cxlmd)) {
> cxl_memdev_unregister(cxlmd);
> return ERR_PTR(-ENXIO);
> }
Gregory Price wrote:
> cxl_memdev_autoremove() takes device_lock(&cxlmd->dev) via guard(device)
> and then calls cxl_memdev_unregister() when the attach callback was
> provided but cxl_mem_probe() failed to bind.
>
> cxl_memdev_unregister() calls
> cdev_device_del()
> device_del()
> bus_remove_device()
> device_release_driver()
>
> This path is reached when a driver uses the @attach parameter to
> devm_cxl_add_memdev() and the CXL topology fails to enumerate (e.g.
> DVSEC range registers decode outside platform-defined CXL ranges,
> causing the endpoint port probe to fail).
>
> Add cxl_memdev_attach_failed() to set the scope of the check correctly.
>
> Fixes: 29317f8dc6ed ("cxl/mem: Introduce cxl_memdev_attach for CXL-dependent operation")
> Signed-off-by: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
This was a kreview find? Would it make sense to do something like
"Reported-by: kreview-<git sha>"?
On Thu, Feb 12, 2026 at 07:16:41PM -0800, dan.j.williams@intel.com wrote:
> Gregory Price wrote:
> > cxl_memdev_autoremove() takes device_lock(&cxlmd->dev) via guard(device)
> > and then calls cxl_memdev_unregister() when the attach callback was
> > provided but cxl_mem_probe() failed to bind.
> >
> > cxl_memdev_unregister() calls
> > cdev_device_del()
> > device_del()
> > bus_remove_device()
> > device_release_driver()
> >
> > This path is reached when a driver uses the @attach parameter to
> > devm_cxl_add_memdev() and the CXL topology fails to enumerate (e.g.
> > DVSEC range registers decode outside platform-defined CXL ranges,
> > causing the endpoint port probe to fail).
> >
> > Add cxl_memdev_attach_failed() to set the scope of the check correctly.
> >
> > Fixes: 29317f8dc6ed ("cxl/mem: Introduce cxl_memdev_attach for CXL-dependent operation")
> > Signed-off-by: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
>
> Looks good,
>
> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>
> This was a kreview find? Would it make sense to do something like
> "Reported-by: kreview-<git sha>"?
Technically it's a combination of Claude using kreview, but I think this
is reasonable since Claude falls over on some of this without the
prompts.
If that's something we want:
Reported-by: kreview-c94b85d6d2
On Wed, 11 Feb 2026, Gregory Price wrote: >cxl_memdev_autoremove() takes device_lock(&cxlmd->dev) via guard(device) >and then calls cxl_memdev_unregister() when the attach callback was >provided but cxl_mem_probe() failed to bind. > >cxl_memdev_unregister() calls > cdev_device_del() > device_del() > bus_remove_device() > device_release_driver() > >This path is reached when a driver uses the @attach parameter to >devm_cxl_add_memdev() and the CXL topology fails to enumerate (e.g. >DVSEC range registers decode outside platform-defined CXL ranges, >causing the endpoint port probe to fail). > >Add cxl_memdev_attach_failed() to set the scope of the check correctly. I preferred the "if (!cxl_memdev_did_attach())" but the below still reads nicely. Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.