[PATCH v4] tee: optee: prevent use-after-free when the client exits before the supplicant

Amirreza Zarrabi posted 1 patch 21 hours ago
drivers/tee/optee/supp.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
[PATCH v4] tee: optee: prevent use-after-free when the client exits before the supplicant
Posted by Amirreza Zarrabi 21 hours ago
Commit 70b0d6b0a199 ("tee: optee: Fix supplicant wait loop") made the
client wait as killable so it can be interrupted during shutdown or
after a supplicant crash. This changes the original lifetime expectations:
the client task can now terminate while the supplicant is still processing
its request.

If the client exits first it removes the request from its queue and
kfree()s it, while the request ID remains in supp->idr. A subsequent
lookup on the supplicant path then dereferences freed memory, leading to
a use-after-free.

Serialise access to the request with supp->mutex:

  * Hold supp->mutex in optee_supp_recv() and optee_supp_send() while
    looking up and touching the request.
  * Let optee_supp_thrd_req() notice that the client has terminated and
    signal optee_supp_send() accordingly.

With these changes the request cannot be freed while the supplicant still
has a reference, eliminating the race.

Fixes: 70b0d6b0a199 ("tee: optee: Fix supplicant wait loop")
Signed-off-by: Amirreza Zarrabi <amirreza.zarrabi@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
Changes in v4:
- Pre-allocate request ID when allocating the request.
- Cleanup the loop in optee_supp_recv().
- Update the return value for revoked request from -ENOENT to -EBADF.
- Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260128-fix-use-after-free-v3-1-b0786670d927@oss.qualcomm.com

Changes in v3:
- Introduce processed flag instead of -1 for req->id.
- Update optee_supp_release() as reported by Michael Wu.
- Use mutex instead of guard.
- Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250617-fix-use-after-free-v2-1-1fbfafec5917@oss.qualcomm.com

Changes in v2:
- Replace the static variable with a sentinel value.
- Fix the issue with returning the popped request to the supplicant.
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250605-fix-use-after-free-v1-1-a70d23bff248@oss.qualcomm.com
---
 drivers/tee/optee/supp.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/supp.c b/drivers/tee/optee/supp.c
index d0f397c90242..c1ae76df7067 100644
--- a/drivers/tee/optee/supp.c
+++ b/drivers/tee/optee/supp.c
@@ -10,7 +10,11 @@
 struct optee_supp_req {
 	struct list_head link;
 
+	int id;
+
 	bool in_queue;
+	bool processed;
+
 	u32 func;
 	u32 ret;
 	size_t num_params;
@@ -19,6 +23,9 @@ struct optee_supp_req {
 	struct completion c;
 };
 
+/* It is temporary request used for revoked pending request in supp->idr. */
+#define INVALID_REQ_PTR ((struct optee_supp_req *)ERR_PTR(-EBADF))
+
 void optee_supp_init(struct optee_supp *supp)
 {
 	memset(supp, 0, sizeof(*supp));
@@ -39,21 +46,23 @@ void optee_supp_release(struct optee_supp *supp)
 {
 	int id;
 	struct optee_supp_req *req;
-	struct optee_supp_req *req_tmp;
 
 	mutex_lock(&supp->mutex);
 
-	/* Abort all request retrieved by supplicant */
+	/* Abort all request */
 	idr_for_each_entry(&supp->idr, req, id) {
 		idr_remove(&supp->idr, id);
-		req->ret = TEEC_ERROR_COMMUNICATION;
-		complete(&req->c);
-	}
+		/* Skip if request was already marked invalid */
+		if (IS_ERR(req))
+			continue;
 
-	/* Abort all queued requests */
-	list_for_each_entry_safe(req, req_tmp, &supp->reqs, link) {
-		list_del(&req->link);
-		req->in_queue = false;
+		/* For queued requests where supplicant has not seen it */
+		if (req->in_queue) {
+			list_del(&req->link);
+			req->in_queue = false;
+		}
+
+		req->processed = true;
 		req->ret = TEEC_ERROR_COMMUNICATION;
 		complete(&req->c);
 	}
@@ -93,6 +102,12 @@ u32 optee_supp_thrd_req(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 func, size_t num_params,
 	if (!req)
 		return TEEC_ERROR_OUT_OF_MEMORY;
 
+	req->id = idr_alloc(&supp->idr, req, 1, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (req->id < 0) {
+		kfree(req);
+		return TEEC_ERROR_OUT_OF_MEMORY;
+	}
+
 	init_completion(&req->c);
 	req->func = func;
 	req->num_params = num_params;
@@ -102,6 +117,7 @@ u32 optee_supp_thrd_req(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 func, size_t num_params,
 	mutex_lock(&supp->mutex);
 	list_add_tail(&req->link, &supp->reqs);
 	req->in_queue = true;
+	req->processed = false;
 	mutex_unlock(&supp->mutex);
 
 	/* Tell an eventual waiter there's a new request */
@@ -117,21 +133,43 @@ u32 optee_supp_thrd_req(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 func, size_t num_params,
 	if (wait_for_completion_killable(&req->c)) {
 		mutex_lock(&supp->mutex);
 		if (req->in_queue) {
+			/* Supplicant has not seen this request yet. */
+			idr_remove(&supp->idr, req->id);
 			list_del(&req->link);
 			req->in_queue = false;
+
+			ret = TEEC_ERROR_COMMUNICATION;
+		} else if (req->processed) {
+			/*
+			 * Supplicant has processed this request. Ignore the
+			 * kill signal for now and submit the result. req is not
+			 * in supp->reqs (removed by supp_pop_entry()) nor in
+			 * supp->idr (removed by supp_pop_req()).
+			 */
+			ret = req->ret;
+		} else {
+			/*
+			 * Supplicant is in the middle of processing this
+			 * request. Replace req with INVALID_REQ_PTR so that
+			 * the ID remains busy, causing optee_supp_send() to
+			 * fail on the next call to supp_pop_req() with this ID.
+			 */
+			idr_replace(&supp->idr, INVALID_REQ_PTR, req->id);
+			ret = TEEC_ERROR_COMMUNICATION;
 		}
+
 		mutex_unlock(&supp->mutex);
-		req->ret = TEEC_ERROR_COMMUNICATION;
+	} else {
+		ret = req->ret;
 	}
 
-	ret = req->ret;
 	kfree(req);
 
 	return ret;
 }
 
 static struct optee_supp_req  *supp_pop_entry(struct optee_supp *supp,
-					      int num_params, int *id)
+					      int num_params)
 {
 	struct optee_supp_req *req;
 
@@ -153,10 +191,6 @@ static struct optee_supp_req  *supp_pop_entry(struct optee_supp *supp,
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 	}
 
-	*id = idr_alloc(&supp->idr, req, 1, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (*id < 0)
-		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
-
 	list_del(&req->link);
 	req->in_queue = false;
 
@@ -214,7 +248,6 @@ int optee_supp_recv(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 *func, u32 *num_params,
 	struct optee *optee = tee_get_drvdata(teedev);
 	struct optee_supp *supp = &optee->supp;
 	struct optee_supp_req *req = NULL;
-	int id;
 	size_t num_meta;
 	int rc;
 
@@ -224,15 +257,11 @@ int optee_supp_recv(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 *func, u32 *num_params,
 
 	while (true) {
 		mutex_lock(&supp->mutex);
-		req = supp_pop_entry(supp, *num_params - num_meta, &id);
+		req = supp_pop_entry(supp, *num_params - num_meta);
+		if (req)
+			break; /* Keep mutex held. */
 		mutex_unlock(&supp->mutex);
 
-		if (req) {
-			if (IS_ERR(req))
-				return PTR_ERR(req);
-			break;
-		}
-
 		/*
 		 * If we didn't get a request we'll block in
 		 * wait_for_completion() to avoid needless spinning.
@@ -245,6 +274,13 @@ int optee_supp_recv(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 *func, u32 *num_params,
 			return -ERESTARTSYS;
 	}
 
+	/* supp->mutex held and req != NULL. */
+
+	if (IS_ERR(req)) {
+		mutex_unlock(&supp->mutex);
+		return PTR_ERR(req);
+	}
+
 	if (num_meta) {
 		/*
 		 * tee-supplicant support meta parameters -> requsts can be
@@ -252,13 +288,11 @@ int optee_supp_recv(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 *func, u32 *num_params,
 		 */
 		param->attr = TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_VALUE_INOUT |
 			      TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_META;
-		param->u.value.a = id;
+		param->u.value.a = req->id;
 		param->u.value.b = 0;
 		param->u.value.c = 0;
 	} else {
-		mutex_lock(&supp->mutex);
-		supp->req_id = id;
-		mutex_unlock(&supp->mutex);
+		supp->req_id = req->id;
 	}
 
 	*func = req->func;
@@ -266,6 +300,7 @@ int optee_supp_recv(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 *func, u32 *num_params,
 	memcpy(param + num_meta, req->param,
 	       sizeof(struct tee_param) * req->num_params);
 
+	mutex_unlock(&supp->mutex);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -297,12 +332,17 @@ static struct optee_supp_req *supp_pop_req(struct optee_supp *supp,
 	if (!req)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
 
+	/* optee_supp_thrd_req() already returned to optee. */
+	if (IS_ERR(req))
+		goto failed_req;
+
 	if ((num_params - nm) != req->num_params)
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 
+	*num_meta = nm;
+failed_req:
 	idr_remove(&supp->idr, id);
 	supp->req_id = -1;
-	*num_meta = nm;
 
 	return req;
 }
@@ -328,10 +368,9 @@ int optee_supp_send(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 ret, u32 num_params,
 
 	mutex_lock(&supp->mutex);
 	req = supp_pop_req(supp, num_params, param, &num_meta);
-	mutex_unlock(&supp->mutex);
-
 	if (IS_ERR(req)) {
-		/* Something is wrong, let supplicant restart. */
+		mutex_unlock(&supp->mutex);
+		/* Something is wrong, let supplicant handel it. */
 		return PTR_ERR(req);
 	}
 
@@ -355,9 +394,10 @@ int optee_supp_send(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 ret, u32 num_params,
 		}
 	}
 	req->ret = ret;
-
+	req->processed = true;
 	/* Let the requesting thread continue */
 	complete(&req->c);
+	mutex_unlock(&supp->mutex);
 
 	return 0;
 }

---
base-commit: 3f24e4edcd1b8981c6b448ea2680726dedd87279
change-id: 20250604-fix-use-after-free-8ff1b5d5d774

Best regards,
-- 
Amirreza Zarrabi <amirreza.zarrabi@oss.qualcomm.com>
Re: [PATCH v4] tee: optee: prevent use-after-free when the client exits before the supplicant
Posted by Sumit Garg 17 hours ago
On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 06:47:39PM -0800, Amirreza Zarrabi wrote:
> Commit 70b0d6b0a199 ("tee: optee: Fix supplicant wait loop") made the
> client wait as killable so it can be interrupted during shutdown or
> after a supplicant crash. This changes the original lifetime expectations:
> the client task can now terminate while the supplicant is still processing
> its request.
> 
> If the client exits first it removes the request from its queue and
> kfree()s it, while the request ID remains in supp->idr. A subsequent
> lookup on the supplicant path then dereferences freed memory, leading to
> a use-after-free.
> 
> Serialise access to the request with supp->mutex:
> 
>   * Hold supp->mutex in optee_supp_recv() and optee_supp_send() while
>     looking up and touching the request.
>   * Let optee_supp_thrd_req() notice that the client has terminated and
>     signal optee_supp_send() accordingly.
> 
> With these changes the request cannot be freed while the supplicant still
> has a reference, eliminating the race.
> 
> Fixes: 70b0d6b0a199 ("tee: optee: Fix supplicant wait loop")
> Signed-off-by: Amirreza Zarrabi <amirreza.zarrabi@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - Pre-allocate request ID when allocating the request.
> - Cleanup the loop in optee_supp_recv().
> - Update the return value for revoked request from -ENOENT to -EBADF.
> - Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260128-fix-use-after-free-v3-1-b0786670d927@oss.qualcomm.com
> 
> Changes in v3:
> - Introduce processed flag instead of -1 for req->id.
> - Update optee_supp_release() as reported by Michael Wu.
> - Use mutex instead of guard.
> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250617-fix-use-after-free-v2-1-1fbfafec5917@oss.qualcomm.com
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - Replace the static variable with a sentinel value.
> - Fix the issue with returning the popped request to the supplicant.
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250605-fix-use-after-free-v1-1-a70d23bff248@oss.qualcomm.com
> ---
>  drivers/tee/optee/supp.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

Looks like a reasonable fix to me but needs a reproducer where this
actually fixes the mentioned problem.

-Sumit

> diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/supp.c b/drivers/tee/optee/supp.c
> index d0f397c90242..c1ae76df7067 100644
> --- a/drivers/tee/optee/supp.c
> +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/supp.c
> @@ -10,7 +10,11 @@
>  struct optee_supp_req {
>  	struct list_head link;
>  
> +	int id;
> +
>  	bool in_queue;
> +	bool processed;
> +
>  	u32 func;
>  	u32 ret;
>  	size_t num_params;
> @@ -19,6 +23,9 @@ struct optee_supp_req {
>  	struct completion c;
>  };
>  
> +/* It is temporary request used for revoked pending request in supp->idr. */
> +#define INVALID_REQ_PTR ((struct optee_supp_req *)ERR_PTR(-EBADF))
> +
>  void optee_supp_init(struct optee_supp *supp)
>  {
>  	memset(supp, 0, sizeof(*supp));
> @@ -39,21 +46,23 @@ void optee_supp_release(struct optee_supp *supp)
>  {
>  	int id;
>  	struct optee_supp_req *req;
> -	struct optee_supp_req *req_tmp;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&supp->mutex);
>  
> -	/* Abort all request retrieved by supplicant */
> +	/* Abort all request */
>  	idr_for_each_entry(&supp->idr, req, id) {
>  		idr_remove(&supp->idr, id);
> -		req->ret = TEEC_ERROR_COMMUNICATION;
> -		complete(&req->c);
> -	}
> +		/* Skip if request was already marked invalid */
> +		if (IS_ERR(req))
> +			continue;
>  
> -	/* Abort all queued requests */
> -	list_for_each_entry_safe(req, req_tmp, &supp->reqs, link) {
> -		list_del(&req->link);
> -		req->in_queue = false;
> +		/* For queued requests where supplicant has not seen it */
> +		if (req->in_queue) {
> +			list_del(&req->link);
> +			req->in_queue = false;
> +		}
> +
> +		req->processed = true;
>  		req->ret = TEEC_ERROR_COMMUNICATION;
>  		complete(&req->c);
>  	}
> @@ -93,6 +102,12 @@ u32 optee_supp_thrd_req(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 func, size_t num_params,
>  	if (!req)
>  		return TEEC_ERROR_OUT_OF_MEMORY;
>  
> +	req->id = idr_alloc(&supp->idr, req, 1, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (req->id < 0) {
> +		kfree(req);
> +		return TEEC_ERROR_OUT_OF_MEMORY;
> +	}
> +
>  	init_completion(&req->c);
>  	req->func = func;
>  	req->num_params = num_params;
> @@ -102,6 +117,7 @@ u32 optee_supp_thrd_req(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 func, size_t num_params,
>  	mutex_lock(&supp->mutex);
>  	list_add_tail(&req->link, &supp->reqs);
>  	req->in_queue = true;
> +	req->processed = false;
>  	mutex_unlock(&supp->mutex);
>  
>  	/* Tell an eventual waiter there's a new request */
> @@ -117,21 +133,43 @@ u32 optee_supp_thrd_req(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 func, size_t num_params,
>  	if (wait_for_completion_killable(&req->c)) {
>  		mutex_lock(&supp->mutex);
>  		if (req->in_queue) {
> +			/* Supplicant has not seen this request yet. */
> +			idr_remove(&supp->idr, req->id);
>  			list_del(&req->link);
>  			req->in_queue = false;
> +
> +			ret = TEEC_ERROR_COMMUNICATION;
> +		} else if (req->processed) {
> +			/*
> +			 * Supplicant has processed this request. Ignore the
> +			 * kill signal for now and submit the result. req is not
> +			 * in supp->reqs (removed by supp_pop_entry()) nor in
> +			 * supp->idr (removed by supp_pop_req()).
> +			 */
> +			ret = req->ret;
> +		} else {
> +			/*
> +			 * Supplicant is in the middle of processing this
> +			 * request. Replace req with INVALID_REQ_PTR so that
> +			 * the ID remains busy, causing optee_supp_send() to
> +			 * fail on the next call to supp_pop_req() with this ID.
> +			 */
> +			idr_replace(&supp->idr, INVALID_REQ_PTR, req->id);
> +			ret = TEEC_ERROR_COMMUNICATION;
>  		}
> +
>  		mutex_unlock(&supp->mutex);
> -		req->ret = TEEC_ERROR_COMMUNICATION;
> +	} else {
> +		ret = req->ret;
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = req->ret;
>  	kfree(req);
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static struct optee_supp_req  *supp_pop_entry(struct optee_supp *supp,
> -					      int num_params, int *id)
> +					      int num_params)
>  {
>  	struct optee_supp_req *req;
>  
> @@ -153,10 +191,6 @@ static struct optee_supp_req  *supp_pop_entry(struct optee_supp *supp,
>  		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>  	}
>  
> -	*id = idr_alloc(&supp->idr, req, 1, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (*id < 0)
> -		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> -
>  	list_del(&req->link);
>  	req->in_queue = false;
>  
> @@ -214,7 +248,6 @@ int optee_supp_recv(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 *func, u32 *num_params,
>  	struct optee *optee = tee_get_drvdata(teedev);
>  	struct optee_supp *supp = &optee->supp;
>  	struct optee_supp_req *req = NULL;
> -	int id;
>  	size_t num_meta;
>  	int rc;
>  
> @@ -224,15 +257,11 @@ int optee_supp_recv(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 *func, u32 *num_params,
>  
>  	while (true) {
>  		mutex_lock(&supp->mutex);
> -		req = supp_pop_entry(supp, *num_params - num_meta, &id);
> +		req = supp_pop_entry(supp, *num_params - num_meta);
> +		if (req)
> +			break; /* Keep mutex held. */
>  		mutex_unlock(&supp->mutex);
>  
> -		if (req) {
> -			if (IS_ERR(req))
> -				return PTR_ERR(req);
> -			break;
> -		}
> -
>  		/*
>  		 * If we didn't get a request we'll block in
>  		 * wait_for_completion() to avoid needless spinning.
> @@ -245,6 +274,13 @@ int optee_supp_recv(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 *func, u32 *num_params,
>  			return -ERESTARTSYS;
>  	}
>  
> +	/* supp->mutex held and req != NULL. */
> +
> +	if (IS_ERR(req)) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&supp->mutex);
> +		return PTR_ERR(req);
> +	}
> +
>  	if (num_meta) {
>  		/*
>  		 * tee-supplicant support meta parameters -> requsts can be
> @@ -252,13 +288,11 @@ int optee_supp_recv(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 *func, u32 *num_params,
>  		 */
>  		param->attr = TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_VALUE_INOUT |
>  			      TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_META;
> -		param->u.value.a = id;
> +		param->u.value.a = req->id;
>  		param->u.value.b = 0;
>  		param->u.value.c = 0;
>  	} else {
> -		mutex_lock(&supp->mutex);
> -		supp->req_id = id;
> -		mutex_unlock(&supp->mutex);
> +		supp->req_id = req->id;
>  	}
>  
>  	*func = req->func;
> @@ -266,6 +300,7 @@ int optee_supp_recv(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 *func, u32 *num_params,
>  	memcpy(param + num_meta, req->param,
>  	       sizeof(struct tee_param) * req->num_params);
>  
> +	mutex_unlock(&supp->mutex);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -297,12 +332,17 @@ static struct optee_supp_req *supp_pop_req(struct optee_supp *supp,
>  	if (!req)
>  		return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
>  
> +	/* optee_supp_thrd_req() already returned to optee. */
> +	if (IS_ERR(req))
> +		goto failed_req;
> +
>  	if ((num_params - nm) != req->num_params)
>  		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>  
> +	*num_meta = nm;
> +failed_req:
>  	idr_remove(&supp->idr, id);
>  	supp->req_id = -1;
> -	*num_meta = nm;
>  
>  	return req;
>  }
> @@ -328,10 +368,9 @@ int optee_supp_send(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 ret, u32 num_params,
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&supp->mutex);
>  	req = supp_pop_req(supp, num_params, param, &num_meta);
> -	mutex_unlock(&supp->mutex);
> -
>  	if (IS_ERR(req)) {
> -		/* Something is wrong, let supplicant restart. */
> +		mutex_unlock(&supp->mutex);
> +		/* Something is wrong, let supplicant handel it. */
>  		return PTR_ERR(req);
>  	}
>  
> @@ -355,9 +394,10 @@ int optee_supp_send(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 ret, u32 num_params,
>  		}
>  	}
>  	req->ret = ret;
> -
> +	req->processed = true;
>  	/* Let the requesting thread continue */
>  	complete(&req->c);
> +	mutex_unlock(&supp->mutex);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
> ---
> base-commit: 3f24e4edcd1b8981c6b448ea2680726dedd87279
> change-id: 20250604-fix-use-after-free-8ff1b5d5d774
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Amirreza Zarrabi <amirreza.zarrabi@oss.qualcomm.com>
>