[PATCH 1/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: add OSM L3 node

Aaron Kling via B4 Relay posted 3 patches 2 days, 5 hours ago
[PATCH 1/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: add OSM L3 node
Posted by Aaron Kling via B4 Relay 2 days, 5 hours ago
From: Aaron Kling <webgeek1234@gmail.com>

Add the OSC L3 Cache controller node.

Signed-off-by: Aaron Kling <webgeek1234@gmail.com>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi
index e3f93f4f412ded9583a6bc9215185a0daf5f1b57..80fc437c9874fd5009ff1eaf4227b75bec5fe883 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi
@@ -5437,6 +5437,16 @@ rpmhpd_opp_turbo_l1: opp-416 {
 			};
 		};
 
+		epss_l3: interconnect@17d90000 {
+			compatible = "qcom,sm8650-epss-l3", "qcom,epss-l3";
+			reg = <0 0x17d90000 0 0x1000>;
+
+			clocks = <&bi_tcxo_div2>, <&gcc GCC_GPLL0>;
+			clock-names = "xo", "alternate";
+
+			#interconnect-cells = <1>;
+		};
+
 		cpufreq_hw: cpufreq@17d91000 {
 			compatible = "qcom,sm8550-cpufreq-epss", "qcom,cpufreq-epss";
 			reg = <0 0x17d91000 0 0x1000>,

-- 
2.52.0
Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: add OSM L3 node
Posted by Konrad Dybcio 21 hours ago
On 2/8/26 2:28 AM, Aaron Kling via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Aaron Kling <webgeek1234@gmail.com>
> 
> Add the OSC L3 Cache controller node.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Kling <webgeek1234@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi
> index e3f93f4f412ded9583a6bc9215185a0daf5f1b57..80fc437c9874fd5009ff1eaf4227b75bec5fe883 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi
> @@ -5437,6 +5437,16 @@ rpmhpd_opp_turbo_l1: opp-416 {
>  			};
>  		};
>  
> +		epss_l3: interconnect@17d90000 {
> +			compatible = "qcom,sm8650-epss-l3", "qcom,epss-l3";
					     ^ this
should definitely be changed to say 8550 instead (it's going to require
an addition to dt-bindings too)

Konrad