From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>

Use SYM_FUNC_{START,END} instead of all the boilerplate.  No functional
change.

Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32/system_call.S | 10 ++--------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32/system_call.S b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32/system_call.S
index 9157cf9c5749..a90f4f7de396 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32/system_call.S
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32/system_call.S
@@ -9,11 +9,7 @@
 #include <asm/alternative.h>
 
 	.text
-	.globl __kernel_vsyscall
-	.type __kernel_vsyscall,@function
-	ALIGN
-__kernel_vsyscall:
-	CFI_STARTPROC
+SYM_FUNC_START(__kernel_vsyscall)
 
 	/*
 	 * If using int $0x80, there is no reason to muck about with the
@@ -85,7 +81,5 @@ SYM_INNER_LABEL(int80_landing_pad, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
 	CFI_RESTORE		ecx
 	CFI_ADJUST_CFA_OFFSET	-4
 	RET
-	CFI_ENDPROC
-
-	.size __kernel_vsyscall,.-__kernel_vsyscall
+SYM_FUNC_END(__kernel_vsyscall)
 	.previous
-- 
2.51.0