[PATCH net-next 3/5] netdevsim: Add devlink port resource registration

Tariq Toukan posted 5 patches 5 days, 21 hours ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH net-next 3/5] netdevsim: Add devlink port resource registration
Posted by Tariq Toukan 5 days, 21 hours ago
From: Or Har-Toov <ohartoov@nvidia.com>

Register port-level resources for netdevsim ports to enable testing
of the port resource infrastructure.

Signed-off-by: Or Har-Toov <ohartoov@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Shay Drori <shayd@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c       | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
 drivers/net/netdevsim/netdevsim.h |  4 ++++
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c b/drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c
index dfd571b22107..ebda1b961664 100644
--- a/drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c
@@ -1486,9 +1486,24 @@ static int __nsim_dev_port_add(struct nsim_dev *nsim_dev, enum nsim_dev_port_typ
 	if (err)
 		goto err_port_free;
 
+	if (nsim_dev_port_is_pf(nsim_dev_port)) {
+		u64 parent_id = DEVLINK_RESOURCE_ID_PARENT_TOP;
+		struct devlink_resource_size_params params = {
+			.size_max = 100,
+			.size_granularity = 1,
+			.unit = DEVLINK_RESOURCE_UNIT_ENTRY
+		};
+
+		err = devl_port_resource_register(devlink_port, "max_sfs", 20,
+						  NSIM_PORT_RESOURCE_MAX_SFS,
+						  parent_id, &params);
+		if (err)
+			goto err_dl_port_unregister;
+	}
+
 	err = nsim_dev_port_debugfs_init(nsim_dev, nsim_dev_port);
 	if (err)
-		goto err_dl_port_unregister;
+		goto err_port_resource_unregister;
 
 	nsim_dev_port->ns = nsim_create(nsim_dev, nsim_dev_port, perm_addr);
 	if (IS_ERR(nsim_dev_port->ns)) {
@@ -1511,6 +1526,9 @@ static int __nsim_dev_port_add(struct nsim_dev *nsim_dev, enum nsim_dev_port_typ
 	nsim_destroy(nsim_dev_port->ns);
 err_port_debugfs_exit:
 	nsim_dev_port_debugfs_exit(nsim_dev_port);
+err_port_resource_unregister:
+	if (nsim_dev_port_is_pf(nsim_dev_port))
+		devl_port_resources_unregister(devlink_port);
 err_dl_port_unregister:
 	devl_port_unregister(devlink_port);
 err_port_free:
@@ -1527,6 +1545,8 @@ static void __nsim_dev_port_del(struct nsim_dev_port *nsim_dev_port)
 		devl_rate_leaf_destroy(&nsim_dev_port->devlink_port);
 	nsim_destroy(nsim_dev_port->ns);
 	nsim_dev_port_debugfs_exit(nsim_dev_port);
+	if (nsim_dev_port_is_pf(nsim_dev_port))
+		devl_port_resources_unregister(devlink_port);
 	devl_port_unregister(devlink_port);
 	kfree(nsim_dev_port);
 }
diff --git a/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdevsim.h b/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdevsim.h
index f767fc8a7505..11ea1a52924a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdevsim.h
+++ b/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdevsim.h
@@ -224,6 +224,10 @@ enum nsim_resource_id {
 	NSIM_RESOURCE_NEXTHOPS,
 };
 
+enum nsim_port_resource_id {
+	NSIM_PORT_RESOURCE_MAX_SFS = 1,
+};
+
 struct nsim_dev_health {
 	struct devlink_health_reporter *empty_reporter;
 	struct devlink_health_reporter *dummy_reporter;
-- 
2.40.1
Re: [PATCH net-next 3/5] netdevsim: Add devlink port resource registration
Posted by Jiri Pirko 4 days, 19 hours ago
Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 08:10:31AM +0100, tariqt@nvidia.com wrote:
>From: Or Har-Toov <ohartoov@nvidia.com>
>
>Register port-level resources for netdevsim ports to enable testing
>of the port resource infrastructure.
>
>Signed-off-by: Or Har-Toov <ohartoov@nvidia.com>
>Reviewed-by: Shay Drori <shayd@nvidia.com>
>Reviewed-by: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@nvidia.com>
>Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
>---
> drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c       | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/net/netdevsim/netdevsim.h |  4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c b/drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c
>index dfd571b22107..ebda1b961664 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c
>@@ -1486,9 +1486,24 @@ static int __nsim_dev_port_add(struct nsim_dev *nsim_dev, enum nsim_dev_port_typ
> 	if (err)
> 		goto err_port_free;
> 
>+	if (nsim_dev_port_is_pf(nsim_dev_port)) {
>+		u64 parent_id = DEVLINK_RESOURCE_ID_PARENT_TOP;
>+		struct devlink_resource_size_params params = {
>+			.size_max = 100,
>+			.size_granularity = 1,
>+			.unit = DEVLINK_RESOURCE_UNIT_ENTRY
>+		};
>+
>+		err = devl_port_resource_register(devlink_port, "max_sfs", 20,

Two questions:
1) Why you have "max_sfs" here and "max_SFs" in mlx5? Just curious
2) Why you don't have the name made up completely instead, like "test1"
   or something? It does not really affect anything in netdevsim.



>+						  NSIM_PORT_RESOURCE_MAX_SFS,
>+						  parent_id, &params);
>+		if (err)
>+			goto err_dl_port_unregister;
>+	}
>+
> 	err = nsim_dev_port_debugfs_init(nsim_dev, nsim_dev_port);
> 	if (err)
>-		goto err_dl_port_unregister;
>+		goto err_port_resource_unregister;
> 
> 	nsim_dev_port->ns = nsim_create(nsim_dev, nsim_dev_port, perm_addr);
> 	if (IS_ERR(nsim_dev_port->ns)) {
>@@ -1511,6 +1526,9 @@ static int __nsim_dev_port_add(struct nsim_dev *nsim_dev, enum nsim_dev_port_typ
> 	nsim_destroy(nsim_dev_port->ns);
> err_port_debugfs_exit:
> 	nsim_dev_port_debugfs_exit(nsim_dev_port);
>+err_port_resource_unregister:
>+	if (nsim_dev_port_is_pf(nsim_dev_port))
>+		devl_port_resources_unregister(devlink_port);
> err_dl_port_unregister:
> 	devl_port_unregister(devlink_port);
> err_port_free:
>@@ -1527,6 +1545,8 @@ static void __nsim_dev_port_del(struct nsim_dev_port *nsim_dev_port)
> 		devl_rate_leaf_destroy(&nsim_dev_port->devlink_port);
> 	nsim_destroy(nsim_dev_port->ns);
> 	nsim_dev_port_debugfs_exit(nsim_dev_port);
>+	if (nsim_dev_port_is_pf(nsim_dev_port))
>+		devl_port_resources_unregister(devlink_port);
> 	devl_port_unregister(devlink_port);
> 	kfree(nsim_dev_port);
> }
>diff --git a/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdevsim.h b/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdevsim.h
>index f767fc8a7505..11ea1a52924a 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdevsim.h
>+++ b/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdevsim.h
>@@ -224,6 +224,10 @@ enum nsim_resource_id {
> 	NSIM_RESOURCE_NEXTHOPS,
> };
> 
>+enum nsim_port_resource_id {
>+	NSIM_PORT_RESOURCE_MAX_SFS = 1,
>+};
>+
> struct nsim_dev_health {
> 	struct devlink_health_reporter *empty_reporter;
> 	struct devlink_health_reporter *dummy_reporter;
>-- 
>2.40.1
>