Drop unnecessary casts from KUnit parameter access since param_value
is a void *. This improves readability and follows common kernel style.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Titouan Ameline de Cadeville <titouan.ameline-de-cadeville@epita.fr>
---
 lib/math/tests/gcd_kunit.c      | 2 +-
 lib/math/tests/int_log_kunit.c  | 4 ++--
 lib/math/tests/int_pow_kunit.c  | 2 +-
 lib/math/tests/int_sqrt_kunit.c | 2 +-
 lib/math/tests/rational_kunit.c | 2 +-
 5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/math/tests/gcd_kunit.c b/lib/math/tests/gcd_kunit.c
index ede1883583b1..b9c9b8758991 100644
--- a/lib/math/tests/gcd_kunit.c
+++ b/lib/math/tests/gcd_kunit.c
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(gcd, params, get_desc);
 
 static void gcd_test(struct kunit *test)
 {
-	const struct test_case_params *tc = (const struct test_case_params *)test->param_value;
+	const struct test_case_params *tc = test->param_value;
 
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tc->expected_result, gcd(tc->val1, tc->val2));
 }
diff --git a/lib/math/tests/int_log_kunit.c b/lib/math/tests/int_log_kunit.c
index 14e854146cb4..9f9b48232701 100644
--- a/lib/math/tests/int_log_kunit.c
+++ b/lib/math/tests/int_log_kunit.c
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(intlog2, intlog2_params, get_desc);
 
 static void intlog2_test(struct kunit *test)
 {
-	const struct test_case_params *tc = (const struct test_case_params *)test->param_value;
+	const struct test_case_params *tc = test->param_value;
 
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tc->expected_result, intlog2(tc->value));
 }
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(intlog10, intlog10_params, get_desc);
 
 static void intlog10_test(struct kunit *test)
 {
-	const struct test_case_params *tc = (const struct test_case_params *)test->param_value;
+	const struct test_case_params *tc = test->param_value;
 
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tc->expected_result, intlog10(tc->value));
 }
diff --git a/lib/math/tests/int_pow_kunit.c b/lib/math/tests/int_pow_kunit.c
index 34b33677d458..ef9c8a9bd8ac 100644
--- a/lib/math/tests/int_pow_kunit.c
+++ b/lib/math/tests/int_pow_kunit.c
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(int_pow, params, get_desc);
 
 static void int_pow_test(struct kunit *test)
 {
-	const struct test_case_params *tc = (const struct test_case_params *)test->param_value;
+	const struct test_case_params *tc = test->param_value;
 
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tc->expected_result, int_pow(tc->base, tc->exponent));
 }
diff --git a/lib/math/tests/int_sqrt_kunit.c b/lib/math/tests/int_sqrt_kunit.c
index 1798e1312eb7..9c46024b0fc1 100644
--- a/lib/math/tests/int_sqrt_kunit.c
+++ b/lib/math/tests/int_sqrt_kunit.c
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(int_sqrt, params, get_desc);
 
 static void int_sqrt_test(struct kunit *test)
 {
-	const struct test_case_params *tc = (const struct test_case_params *)test->param_value;
+	const struct test_case_params *tc = test->param_value;
 
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tc->expected_result, int_sqrt(tc->x));
 }
diff --git a/lib/math/tests/rational_kunit.c b/lib/math/tests/rational_kunit.c
index 47486a95f088..b05587a1e90a 100644
--- a/lib/math/tests/rational_kunit.c
+++ b/lib/math/tests/rational_kunit.c
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(rational, test_parameters, get_desc);
 
 static void rational_test(struct kunit *test)
 {
-	const struct rational_test_param *param = (const struct rational_test_param *)test->param_value;
+	const struct rational_test_param *param = test->param_value;
 	unsigned long n = 0, d = 0;
 
 	rational_best_approximation(param->num, param->den, param->max_num, param->max_den, &n, &d);
-- 
2.44.2

On Tue, 3 Feb 2026 at 09:40, Titouan Ameline de Cadeville
<titouan.ameline@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Drop unnecessary casts from KUnit parameter access since param_value
> is a void *. This improves readability and follows common kernel style.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Titouan Ameline de Cadeville <titouan.ameline-de-cadeville@epita.fr>
> ---

Thanks: this is fine by me.

Could you CC linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org and
kunit-dev@googlegroups.com if you want this to go via the
kselftest/kunit branch, or akpm@linux-foundation.org if you'd rather
it go in via mm-nonmm-stable?

Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>

Cheers,
-- David