drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-nxp-s32g.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
No error return is missing after the loop resulting in removing the
ports from the list.
Fixes: 5cbc7d3e316e ("PCI: s32g: Add NXP S32G PCIe controller driver (RC)")
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
---
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-nxp-s32g.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-nxp-s32g.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-nxp-s32g.c
index 47745749f75c..767f5a622441 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-nxp-s32g.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-nxp-s32g.c
@@ -285,6 +285,8 @@ static int s32g_pcie_parse_ports(struct device *dev, struct s32g_pcie *s32g_pp)
goto err_port;
}
+ return 0;
+
err_port:
list_for_each_entry_safe(port, tmp, &s32g_pp->ports, list)
list_del(&port->list);
--
2.43.0
On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 02:07:56PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> No error return is missing after the loop resulting in removing the
> ports from the list.
>
> Fixes: 5cbc7d3e316e ("PCI: s32g: Add NXP S32G PCIe controller driver (RC)")
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-nxp-s32g.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-nxp-s32g.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-nxp-s32g.c
> index 47745749f75c..767f5a622441 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-nxp-s32g.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-nxp-s32g.c
> @@ -285,6 +285,8 @@ static int s32g_pcie_parse_ports(struct device *dev, struct s32g_pcie *s32g_pp)
> goto err_port;
> }
>
> + return 0;
> +
Hmm. So the initial 'ret = -ENOENT' will become redundant and you'll return
success even if there are no Root Ports in DT.
You should do:
if (!of_get_available_child_count(dev->of_node))
return -ENOENT;
at the start and remove the 'ret' initialization.
- Mani
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
On Mon, 2 Feb 2026 at 14:18, Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 02:07:56PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > No error return is missing after the loop resulting in removing the
> > ports from the list.
> >
> > Fixes: 5cbc7d3e316e ("PCI: s32g: Add NXP S32G PCIe controller driver (RC)")
> > Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-nxp-s32g.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-nxp-s32g.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-nxp-s32g.c
> > index 47745749f75c..767f5a622441 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-nxp-s32g.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-nxp-s32g.c
> > @@ -285,6 +285,8 @@ static int s32g_pcie_parse_ports(struct device *dev, struct s32g_pcie *s32g_pp)
> > goto err_port;
> > }
> >
> > + return 0;
> > +
>
> Hmm. So the initial 'ret = -ENOENT' will become redundant and you'll return
> success even if there are no Root Ports in DT.
good point.
>
> You should do:
>
> if (!of_get_available_child_count(dev->of_node))
> return -ENOENT;
or maybe
+ if (!ret)
+ return 0;
>
> at the start and remove the 'ret' initialization.
>
> - Mani
>
> --
> மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 02:23:52PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Feb 2026 at 14:18, Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 02:07:56PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > > No error return is missing after the loop resulting in removing the
> > > ports from the list.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 5cbc7d3e316e ("PCI: s32g: Add NXP S32G PCIe controller driver (RC)")
> > > Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-nxp-s32g.c | 2 ++
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-nxp-s32g.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-nxp-s32g.c
> > > index 47745749f75c..767f5a622441 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-nxp-s32g.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-nxp-s32g.c
> > > @@ -285,6 +285,8 @@ static int s32g_pcie_parse_ports(struct device *dev, struct s32g_pcie *s32g_pp)
> > > goto err_port;
> > > }
> > >
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> >
> > Hmm. So the initial 'ret = -ENOENT' will become redundant and you'll return
> > success even if there are no Root Ports in DT.
>
> good point.
>
> >
> > You should do:
> >
> > if (!of_get_available_child_count(dev->of_node))
> > return -ENOENT;
>
> or maybe
>
> + if (!ret)
> + return 0;
>
That'll work too. For some reason, I initially thought it would be ugly, but it
doesn't :)
- Mani
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
Le lundi 02 févr. 2026 à 18:58:34 (+0530), Manivannan Sadhasivam a écrit :
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 02:23:52PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > On Mon, 2 Feb 2026 at 14:18, Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 02:07:56PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > > > No error return is missing after the loop resulting in removing the
> > > > ports from the list.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 5cbc7d3e316e ("PCI: s32g: Add NXP S32G PCIe controller driver (RC)")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-nxp-s32g.c | 2 ++
> > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-nxp-s32g.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-nxp-s32g.c
> > > > index 47745749f75c..767f5a622441 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-nxp-s32g.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-nxp-s32g.c
> > > > @@ -285,6 +285,8 @@ static int s32g_pcie_parse_ports(struct device *dev, struct s32g_pcie *s32g_pp)
> > > > goto err_port;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +
> > >
> > > Hmm. So the initial 'ret = -ENOENT' will become redundant and you'll return
> > > success even if there are no Root Ports in DT.
> >
> > good point.
> >
> > >
> > > You should do:
> > >
> > > if (!of_get_available_child_count(dev->of_node))
> > > return -ENOENT;
> >
> > or maybe
> >
> > + if (!ret)
> > + return 0;
> >
>
> That'll work too. For some reason, I initially thought it would be ugly, but it
> doesn't :)
In fact this enables more changes and I end up with:
@@ -282,12 +282,12 @@ static int s32g_pcie_parse_ports(struct device *dev, struct s32g_pcie *s32g_pp)
ret = s32g_pcie_parse_port(s32g_pp, of_port);
if (ret)
- goto err_port;
+ break;
}
-err_port:
- list_for_each_entry_safe(port, tmp, &s32g_pp->ports, list)
- list_del(&port->list);
+ if (ret)
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(port, tmp, &s32g_pp->ports, list)
+ list_del(&port->list);
return ret;
}
--
>
> - Mani
>
> --
> மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.