Commit f708f6970cc9 ("mm/hugetlb: fix kernel NULL pointer dereference when
migrating hugetlb folio") fixed a NULL pointer dereference when
folio_undo_large_rmappable(), now folio_unqueue_deferred_list(), is used on
hugetlb to clear deferred_list. It cleared large_rmappable flag on hugetlb.
hugetlb is rmappable, thus clearing large_rmappable flag looks misleading.
Instead, reject hugetlb in folio_unqueue_deferred_list() to avoid the
issue.
This prepares for code separation of compound page and folio in a follow-up
commit.
Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
---
mm/hugetlb.c | 6 +++---
mm/hugetlb_cma.c | 2 +-
mm/internal.h | 3 ++-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 6e855a32de3d..7466c7bf41a1 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -1422,8 +1422,8 @@ static struct folio *alloc_gigantic_frozen_folio(int order, gfp_t gfp_mask,
if (hugetlb_cma_exclusive_alloc())
return NULL;
- folio = (struct folio *)alloc_contig_frozen_pages(1 << order, gfp_mask,
- nid, nodemask);
+ folio = page_rmappable_folio(alloc_contig_frozen_pages(1 << order, gfp_mask,
+ nid, nodemask));
return folio;
}
#else /* !CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE || !CONFIG_CONTIG_ALLOC */
@@ -1859,7 +1859,7 @@ static struct folio *alloc_buddy_frozen_folio(int order, gfp_t gfp_mask,
if (alloc_try_hard)
gfp_mask |= __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL;
- folio = (struct folio *)__alloc_frozen_pages(gfp_mask, order, nid, nmask);
+ folio = page_rmappable_folio(__alloc_frozen_pages(gfp_mask, order, nid, nmask));
/*
* If we did not specify __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL, but still got a
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb_cma.c b/mm/hugetlb_cma.c
index f83ae4998990..4245b5dda4dc 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb_cma.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb_cma.c
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ struct folio *hugetlb_cma_alloc_frozen_folio(int order, gfp_t gfp_mask,
if (!page)
return NULL;
- folio = page_folio(page);
+ folio = page_rmappable_folio(page);
folio_set_hugetlb_cma(folio);
return folio;
}
diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
index d67e8bb75734..8bb22fb9a0e1 100644
--- a/mm/internal.h
+++ b/mm/internal.h
@@ -835,7 +835,8 @@ static inline void folio_set_order(struct folio *folio, unsigned int order)
bool __folio_unqueue_deferred_split(struct folio *folio);
static inline bool folio_unqueue_deferred_split(struct folio *folio)
{
- if (folio_order(folio) <= 1 || !folio_test_large_rmappable(folio))
+ if (folio_order(folio) <= 1 || !folio_test_large_rmappable(folio) ||
+ folio_test_hugetlb(folio))
return false;
/*
--
2.51.0
On 1/30/26 11:48 AM, Zi Yan wrote:
> Commit f708f6970cc9 ("mm/hugetlb: fix kernel NULL pointer dereference when
> migrating hugetlb folio") fixed a NULL pointer dereference when
> folio_undo_large_rmappable(), now folio_unqueue_deferred_list(), is used on
> hugetlb to clear deferred_list. It cleared large_rmappable flag on hugetlb.
> hugetlb is rmappable, thus clearing large_rmappable flag looks misleading.
> Instead, reject hugetlb in folio_unqueue_deferred_list() to avoid the
> issue.
>
> This prepares for code separation of compound page and folio in a follow-up
> commit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
> ---
> mm/hugetlb.c | 6 +++---
> mm/hugetlb_cma.c | 2 +-
> mm/internal.h | 3 ++-
> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 6e855a32de3d..7466c7bf41a1 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -1422,8 +1422,8 @@ static struct folio *alloc_gigantic_frozen_folio(int order, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> if (hugetlb_cma_exclusive_alloc())
> return NULL;
>
> - folio = (struct folio *)alloc_contig_frozen_pages(1 << order, gfp_mask,
> - nid, nodemask);
> + folio = page_rmappable_folio(alloc_contig_frozen_pages(1 << order, gfp_mask,
> + nid, nodemask));
> return folio;
> }
> #else /* !CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE || !CONFIG_CONTIG_ALLOC */
> @@ -1859,7 +1859,7 @@ static struct folio *alloc_buddy_frozen_folio(int order, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> if (alloc_try_hard)
> gfp_mask |= __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL;
>
> - folio = (struct folio *)__alloc_frozen_pages(gfp_mask, order, nid, nmask);
> + folio = page_rmappable_folio(__alloc_frozen_pages(gfp_mask, order, nid, nmask));
>
> /*
> * If we did not specify __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL, but still got a
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb_cma.c b/mm/hugetlb_cma.c
> index f83ae4998990..4245b5dda4dc 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb_cma.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb_cma.c
> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ struct folio *hugetlb_cma_alloc_frozen_folio(int order, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> if (!page)
> return NULL;
>
> - folio = page_folio(page);
> + folio = page_rmappable_folio(page);
> folio_set_hugetlb_cma(folio);
> return folio;
> }
IIUC, this will break the semantics of the is_transparent_hugepage() and
might trigger a split of a hugetlb folio, right?
static inline bool is_transparent_hugepage(const struct folio *folio)
{
if (!folio_test_large(folio))
return false;
return is_huge_zero_folio(folio) ||
folio_test_large_rmappable(folio);
}
On 1 Feb 2026, at 22:59, Baolin Wang wrote:
> On 1/30/26 11:48 AM, Zi Yan wrote:
>> Commit f708f6970cc9 ("mm/hugetlb: fix kernel NULL pointer dereference when
>> migrating hugetlb folio") fixed a NULL pointer dereference when
>> folio_undo_large_rmappable(), now folio_unqueue_deferred_list(), is used on
>> hugetlb to clear deferred_list. It cleared large_rmappable flag on hugetlb.
>> hugetlb is rmappable, thus clearing large_rmappable flag looks misleading.
>> Instead, reject hugetlb in folio_unqueue_deferred_list() to avoid the
>> issue.
>>
>> This prepares for code separation of compound page and folio in a follow-up
>> commit.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>> mm/hugetlb.c | 6 +++---
>> mm/hugetlb_cma.c | 2 +-
>> mm/internal.h | 3 ++-
>> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
>> index 6e855a32de3d..7466c7bf41a1 100644
>> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
>> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
>> @@ -1422,8 +1422,8 @@ static struct folio *alloc_gigantic_frozen_folio(int order, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>> if (hugetlb_cma_exclusive_alloc())
>> return NULL;
>> - folio = (struct folio *)alloc_contig_frozen_pages(1 << order, gfp_mask,
>> - nid, nodemask);
>> + folio = page_rmappable_folio(alloc_contig_frozen_pages(1 << order, gfp_mask,
>> + nid, nodemask));
>> return folio;
>> }
>> #else /* !CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE || !CONFIG_CONTIG_ALLOC */
>> @@ -1859,7 +1859,7 @@ static struct folio *alloc_buddy_frozen_folio(int order, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>> if (alloc_try_hard)
>> gfp_mask |= __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL;
>> - folio = (struct folio *)__alloc_frozen_pages(gfp_mask, order, nid, nmask);
>> + folio = page_rmappable_folio(__alloc_frozen_pages(gfp_mask, order, nid, nmask));
>> /*
>> * If we did not specify __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL, but still got a
>> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb_cma.c b/mm/hugetlb_cma.c
>> index f83ae4998990..4245b5dda4dc 100644
>> --- a/mm/hugetlb_cma.c
>> +++ b/mm/hugetlb_cma.c
>> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ struct folio *hugetlb_cma_alloc_frozen_folio(int order, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>> if (!page)
>> return NULL;
>> - folio = page_folio(page);
>> + folio = page_rmappable_folio(page);
>> folio_set_hugetlb_cma(folio);
>> return folio;
>> }
>
> IIUC, this will break the semantics of the is_transparent_hugepage() and might trigger a split of a hugetlb folio, right?
>
> static inline bool is_transparent_hugepage(const struct folio *folio)
> {
> if (!folio_test_large(folio))
> return false;
>
> return is_huge_zero_folio(folio) ||
> folio_test_large_rmappable(folio);
> }
Oh, I missed this. I will check all folio_test_large_rmappable() callers
and filter out hugetlb if necessary.
Thank you for pointing this out.
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.