virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
guest_memfd folios don't care about accessed flags since the memory is
unevictable and there is no storage to write back to, hence, cleanup the
allocation path by not setting FGP_ACCESSED.
Signed-off-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
[sean: split to separate patch]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
---
virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c b/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
index fdaea3422c30..b3117f3359af 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
@@ -140,14 +140,13 @@ static struct folio *kvm_gmem_get_folio(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index)
* Fast-path: See if folio is already present in mapping to avoid
* policy_lookup.
*/
- folio = __filemap_get_folio(inode->i_mapping, index,
- FGP_LOCK | FGP_ACCESSED, 0);
+ folio = filemap_lock_folio(inode->i_mapping, index);
if (!IS_ERR(folio))
return folio;
policy = mpol_shared_policy_lookup(&GMEM_I(inode)->policy, index);
folio = __filemap_get_folio_mpol(inode->i_mapping, index,
- FGP_LOCK | FGP_ACCESSED | FGP_CREAT,
+ FGP_LOCK | FGP_CREAT,
mapping_gfp_mask(inode->i_mapping), policy);
mpol_cond_put(policy);
--
2.53.0.rc1.225.gd81095ad13-goog
On 1/29/26 18:26, Ackerley Tng wrote: > guest_memfd folios don't care about accessed flags since the memory is > unevictable and there is no storage to write back to, hence, cleanup the > allocation path by not setting FGP_ACCESSED. > > Signed-off-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com> > [sean: split to separate patch] > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> > Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> > --- Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (arm) <david@kernel.org> -- Cheers David
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.