On 26/01/2026 09:26, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
>
> The memblock API guarantees that start is not greater than or equal to
> end, so there is no need to test it. And if were, it is doubtful that
> breaking out of the loop would be a reasonable course of action here
> (rather than attempting to map the remaining regions)
>
> So let's drop this check.
If start were greater than end, I think it's a pretty safe bet that
__map_memblock() would do something horrible.
But if memblock makes the guarantee you claim I agree it's preferable to
declutter the code:
Reviewed-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> index d7faa98f427c..377bdc4d84a1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -1158,8 +1158,6 @@ static void __init map_mem(pgd_t *pgdp)
>
> /* map all the memory banks */
> for_each_mem_range(i, &start, &end) {
> - if (start >= end)
> - break;
> /*
> * The linear map must allow allocation tags reading/writing
> * if MTE is present. Otherwise, it has the same attributes as