The commit 337b1b566db0 ("PCI: Fix restoring BARs on BAR resize
rollback path") added BAR rollback to
pci_do_resource_release_and_resize() in case of resize failure.
On the rollback, pci_claim_resource() is called which can fail and the
code is prepared for that possibility. pci_claim_resource()'s return
value, however, overwrites the original value of ret so
pci_claim_resource() will return incorrect value in the end (as
pci_claim_resource() normally succeeds, in practice ret will be 0).
Fix the issue by directly calling pci_claim_resource() inside the if ().
Fixes: 337b1b566db0 ("PCI: Fix restoring BARs on BAR resize rollback path")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/aW_w1oFQCzUxGYtu@intel.com/
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/pci/setup-bus.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
index 6e90f46f52af..9c374feafc77 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
@@ -2556,8 +2556,7 @@ int pci_do_resource_release_and_resize(struct pci_dev *pdev, int resno, int size
restore_dev_resource(dev_res);
- ret = pci_claim_resource(dev, i);
- if (ret)
+ if (pci_claim_resource(dev, i))
continue;
if (i < PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCES) {
--
2.39.5
On Wed, 21 Jan 2026, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> The commit 337b1b566db0 ("PCI: Fix restoring BARs on BAR resize
> rollback path") added BAR rollback to
> pci_do_resource_release_and_resize() in case of resize failure.
>
> On the rollback, pci_claim_resource() is called which can fail and the
> code is prepared for that possibility. pci_claim_resource()'s return
> value, however, overwrites the original value of ret so
> pci_claim_resource() will return incorrect value in the end (as
Hi Bjorn,
I noticed this should have been:
"pci_do_resource_release_and_resize() will return incorrect value in the
end ..."
(used a wrong function name).
Could you please adjust the commit message in your tree if it's not too
late yet?
I'm sorry about the extra hassle.
--
i.
> pci_claim_resource() normally succeeds, in practice ret will be 0).
>
> Fix the issue by directly calling pci_claim_resource() inside the if ().
>
> Fixes: 337b1b566db0 ("PCI: Fix restoring BARs on BAR resize rollback path")
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/aW_w1oFQCzUxGYtu@intel.com/
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reported-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/setup-bus.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> index 6e90f46f52af..9c374feafc77 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> @@ -2556,8 +2556,7 @@ int pci_do_resource_release_and_resize(struct pci_dev *pdev, int resno, int size
>
> restore_dev_resource(dev_res);
>
> - ret = pci_claim_resource(dev, i);
> - if (ret)
> + if (pci_claim_resource(dev, i))
> continue;
>
> if (i < PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCES) {
>
On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 12:07:40PM +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2026, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
>
> > The commit 337b1b566db0 ("PCI: Fix restoring BARs on BAR resize
> > rollback path") added BAR rollback to
> > pci_do_resource_release_and_resize() in case of resize failure.
> >
> > On the rollback, pci_claim_resource() is called which can fail and the
> > code is prepared for that possibility. pci_claim_resource()'s return
> > value, however, overwrites the original value of ret so
> > pci_claim_resource() will return incorrect value in the end (as
>
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> I noticed this should have been:
>
> "pci_do_resource_release_and_resize() will return incorrect value in the
> end ..."
>
> (used a wrong function name).
>
> Could you please adjust the commit message in your tree if it's not too
> late yet?
Updated, thanks!
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.