drivers/soc/qcom/socinfo.c | 1 + include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
Hi, This is early and first/initial posting for upstreaming Eliza SoC, e.g. CQ7790S IoT variant. AFAIK, there is also CQ7790M variant with different ID, but I do not have such hardware, thus only "S" goes here. As this is very early posting, more patches will be sent gradually later. BR, Krzysztof Krzysztof Kozlowski (2): dt-bindings: arm: qcom,ids: Add SoC ID for CQ7790S soc: qcom: socinfo: Add SoC ID for CQ7790S drivers/soc/qcom/socinfo.c | 1 + include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+) -- 2.51.0
On 1/19/26 10:59 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Hi, > > This is early and first/initial posting for upstreaming Eliza SoC, e.g. > CQ7790S IoT variant. AFAIK, there is also CQ7790M variant with different > ID, but I do not have such hardware, thus only "S" goes here. If you're sure about this marketing name being assigned to a specific SMEM ID, those *never* change after they're assigned, so it's fine if you just add it to the list Konrad
On 19/01/2026 11:50, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > On 1/19/26 10:59 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This is early and first/initial posting for upstreaming Eliza SoC, e.g. >> CQ7790S IoT variant. AFAIK, there is also CQ7790M variant with different >> ID, but I do not have such hardware, thus only "S" goes here. > > If you're sure about this marketing name being assigned to a specific > SMEM ID, those *never* change after they're assigned, so it's fine if > you just add it to the list I don't know if I ever going to work on the M (modem) variant, so do you want to document it just for completeness? Best regards, Krzysztof
On 1/19/26 12:03 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 19/01/2026 11:50, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> On 1/19/26 10:59 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> This is early and first/initial posting for upstreaming Eliza SoC, e.g. >>> CQ7790S IoT variant. AFAIK, there is also CQ7790M variant with different >>> ID, but I do not have such hardware, thus only "S" goes here. >> >> If you're sure about this marketing name being assigned to a specific >> SMEM ID, those *never* change after they're assigned, so it's fine if >> you just add it to the list > > I don't know if I ever going to work on the M (modem) variant, so do you > want to document it just for completeness? If there's no internal reasons preventing you from it, sure Konrad
On 19/01/2026 12:10, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > On 1/19/26 12:03 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 19/01/2026 11:50, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >>> On 1/19/26 10:59 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> This is early and first/initial posting for upstreaming Eliza SoC, e.g. >>>> CQ7790S IoT variant. AFAIK, there is also CQ7790M variant with different >>>> ID, but I do not have such hardware, thus only "S" goes here. >>> >>> If you're sure about this marketing name being assigned to a specific >>> SMEM ID, those *never* change after they're assigned, so it's fine if >>> you just add it to the list >> >> I don't know if I ever going to work on the M (modem) variant, so do you >> want to document it just for completeness? > > If there's no internal reasons preventing you from it, sure Sure, I can add it. I will send a v2 later today or tomorrow, in case there are any more comments. Best regards, Krzysztof
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.