[PATCH] net: caif: fix memory leak in ldisc_receive

Osama Abdelkader posted 1 patch 2 weeks, 6 days ago
There is a newer version of this series
drivers/net/caif/caif_serial.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
[PATCH] net: caif: fix memory leak in ldisc_receive
Posted by Osama Abdelkader 2 weeks, 6 days ago
Add NULL pointer checks for ser and ser->dev in ldisc_receive() to
prevent memory leaks when the function is called during device close
or in race conditions where tty->disc_data or ser->dev may be NULL.

The memory leak occurred because netdev_alloc_skb() would allocate an
skb, but if ser or ser->dev was NULL, the function would return early
without freeing the allocated skb. Additionally, ser->dev was accessed
before checking if it was NULL, which could cause a NULL pointer
dereference.

Reported-by: syzbot+f9d847b2b84164fa69f3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes:
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f9d847b2b84164fa69f3
Fixes: 9b27105b4a44 ("net-caif-driver: add CAIF serial driver (ldisc)")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Osama Abdelkader <osama.abdelkader@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/caif/caif_serial.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/caif/caif_serial.c b/drivers/net/caif/caif_serial.c
index c398ac42eae9..0ec9670bd35c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/caif/caif_serial.c
+++ b/drivers/net/caif/caif_serial.c
@@ -152,12 +152,16 @@ static void ldisc_receive(struct tty_struct *tty, const u8 *data,
 	int ret;
 
 	ser = tty->disc_data;
+	if (!ser)
+		return;
 
 	/*
 	 * NOTE: flags may contain information about break or overrun.
 	 * This is not yet handled.
 	 */
 
+	if (!ser->dev)
+		return;
 
 	/*
 	 * Workaround for garbage at start of transmission,
@@ -170,8 +174,6 @@ static void ldisc_receive(struct tty_struct *tty, const u8 *data,
 		return;
 	}
 
-	BUG_ON(ser->dev == NULL);
-
 	/* Get a suitable caif packet and copy in data. */
 	skb = netdev_alloc_skb(ser->dev, count+1);
 	if (skb == NULL)
-- 
2.43.0
Re: [PATCH] net: caif: fix memory leak in ldisc_receive
Posted by Greg Kroah-Hartman 2 weeks, 6 days ago
On Sun, Jan 18, 2026 at 03:47:54PM +0100, Osama Abdelkader wrote:
> Add NULL pointer checks for ser and ser->dev in ldisc_receive() to
> prevent memory leaks when the function is called during device close
> or in race conditions where tty->disc_data or ser->dev may be NULL.
> 
> The memory leak occurred because netdev_alloc_skb() would allocate an
> skb, but if ser or ser->dev was NULL, the function would return early
> without freeing the allocated skb. Additionally, ser->dev was accessed
> before checking if it was NULL, which could cause a NULL pointer
> dereference.
> 
> Reported-by: syzbot+f9d847b2b84164fa69f3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes:
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f9d847b2b84164fa69f3

Please do not wrap this line.

> Fixes: 9b27105b4a44 ("net-caif-driver: add CAIF serial driver (ldisc)")
> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Osama Abdelkader <osama.abdelkader@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/caif/caif_serial.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/caif/caif_serial.c b/drivers/net/caif/caif_serial.c
> index c398ac42eae9..0ec9670bd35c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/caif/caif_serial.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/caif/caif_serial.c
> @@ -152,12 +152,16 @@ static void ldisc_receive(struct tty_struct *tty, const u8 *data,
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	ser = tty->disc_data;
> +	if (!ser)
> +		return;

Can this ever be true?

>  	/*
>  	 * NOTE: flags may contain information about break or overrun.
>  	 * This is not yet handled.
>  	 */
>  
> +	if (!ser->dev)
> +		return;

Why is this check here and not just merged together with the one you
added above?  And how can ->dev be NULL?

And where is the locking to prevent this from changing right after you
check it?

thanks,

greg k-h
Re: [PATCH] net: caif: fix memory leak in ldisc_receive
Posted by Osama Abdelkader 2 weeks, 6 days ago
On Sun, Jan 18, 2026 at 04:02:44PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2026 at 03:47:54PM +0100, Osama Abdelkader wrote:
> > Add NULL pointer checks for ser and ser->dev in ldisc_receive() to
> > prevent memory leaks when the function is called during device close
> > or in race conditions where tty->disc_data or ser->dev may be NULL.
> > 
> > The memory leak occurred because netdev_alloc_skb() would allocate an
> > skb, but if ser or ser->dev was NULL, the function would return early
> > without freeing the allocated skb. Additionally, ser->dev was accessed
> > before checking if it was NULL, which could cause a NULL pointer
> > dereference.
> > 
> > Reported-by: syzbot+f9d847b2b84164fa69f3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> > Closes:
> > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f9d847b2b84164fa69f3
> 
> Please do not wrap this line.

OK.

> 
> > Fixes: 9b27105b4a44 ("net-caif-driver: add CAIF serial driver (ldisc)")
> > CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Osama Abdelkader <osama.abdelkader@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/caif/caif_serial.c | 6 ++++--
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/caif/caif_serial.c b/drivers/net/caif/caif_serial.c
> > index c398ac42eae9..0ec9670bd35c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/caif/caif_serial.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/caif/caif_serial.c
> > @@ -152,12 +152,16 @@ static void ldisc_receive(struct tty_struct *tty, const u8 *data,
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> >  	ser = tty->disc_data;
> > +	if (!ser)
> > +		return;
> 
> Can this ever be true?

Yes, when the line discipline is changed, tty_set_termios_ldisc() sets tty->disc_data = NULL
> 
> >  	/*
> >  	 * NOTE: flags may contain information about break or overrun.
> >  	 * This is not yet handled.
> >  	 */
> >  
> > +	if (!ser->dev)
> > +		return;
> 
> Why is this check here and not just merged together with the one you
> added above?  And how can ->dev be NULL?

I'm going to combine them in v2.
If ser exists, ser->dev should be non-NULL (they're created together), but the check is defensive.

> 
> And where is the locking to prevent this from changing right after you
> check it?
> 

I'm going to address that in v2.

> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Thanks,
Osama