[PATCH v3 5/8] drm/msm/dp: Drop EV_USER_NOTIFICATION

Dmitry Baryshkov posted 8 patches 3 weeks, 3 days ago
[PATCH v3 5/8] drm/msm/dp: Drop EV_USER_NOTIFICATION
Posted by Dmitry Baryshkov 3 weeks, 3 days ago
From: Jessica Zhang <jessica.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com>

Currently, we queue an event for signalling HPD connect/disconnect. This
can mean a delay in plug/unplug handling and notifying DRM core when a
hotplug happens.

Drop EV_USER_NOTIFICATION and signal the IRQ event as part of hotplug
handling.

Signed-off-by: Jessica Zhang <jessica.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c | 28 ++++++++--------------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c     |  2 ++
 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
index 3184066adb15..e0b424ac861a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
@@ -58,7 +58,6 @@ enum {
 	EV_HPD_PLUG_INT,
 	EV_IRQ_HPD_INT,
 	EV_HPD_UNPLUG_INT,
-	EV_USER_NOTIFICATION,
 };
 
 #define EVENT_TIMEOUT	(HZ/10)	/* 100ms */
@@ -343,17 +342,6 @@ static const struct component_ops msm_dp_display_comp_ops = {
 	.unbind = msm_dp_display_unbind,
 };
 
-static void msm_dp_display_send_hpd_event(struct msm_dp *msm_dp_display)
-{
-	struct msm_dp_display_private *dp;
-	struct drm_connector *connector;
-
-	dp = container_of(msm_dp_display, struct msm_dp_display_private, msm_dp_display);
-
-	connector = dp->msm_dp_display.connector;
-	drm_helper_hpd_irq_event(connector->dev);
-}
-
 static int msm_dp_display_send_hpd_notification(struct msm_dp_display_private *dp,
 					    bool hpd)
 {
@@ -377,7 +365,11 @@ static int msm_dp_display_send_hpd_notification(struct msm_dp_display_private *d
 
 	drm_dbg_dp(dp->drm_dev, "type=%d hpd=%d\n",
 			dp->msm_dp_display.connector_type, hpd);
-	msm_dp_display_send_hpd_event(&dp->msm_dp_display);
+
+	drm_bridge_hpd_notify(dp->msm_dp_display.bridge,
+			      hpd ?
+			      connector_status_connected :
+			      connector_status_disconnected);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -437,7 +429,7 @@ static int msm_dp_display_process_hpd_high(struct msm_dp_display_private *dp)
 
 	msm_dp_link_reset_phy_params_vx_px(dp->link);
 
-	msm_dp_add_event(dp, EV_USER_NOTIFICATION, true, 0);
+	msm_dp_display_send_hpd_notification(dp, true);
 
 end:
 	return rc;
@@ -506,7 +498,7 @@ static int msm_dp_display_notify_disconnect(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct msm_dp_display_private *dp = dev_get_dp_display_private(dev);
 
-	msm_dp_add_event(dp, EV_USER_NOTIFICATION, false, 0);
+	msm_dp_display_send_hpd_notification(dp, false);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -527,7 +519,7 @@ static int msm_dp_display_handle_port_status_changed(struct msm_dp_display_priva
 		drm_dbg_dp(dp->drm_dev, "sink count is zero, nothing to do\n");
 		if (dp->hpd_state != ST_DISCONNECTED) {
 			dp->hpd_state = ST_DISCONNECT_PENDING;
-			msm_dp_add_event(dp, EV_USER_NOTIFICATION, false, 0);
+			msm_dp_display_send_hpd_notification(dp, false);
 		}
 	} else {
 		if (dp->hpd_state == ST_DISCONNECTED) {
@@ -1121,10 +1113,6 @@ static int hpd_event_thread(void *data)
 		case EV_IRQ_HPD_INT:
 			msm_dp_irq_hpd_handle(msm_dp_priv, todo->data);
 			break;
-		case EV_USER_NOTIFICATION:
-			msm_dp_display_send_hpd_notification(msm_dp_priv,
-						todo->data);
-			break;
 		default:
 			break;
 		}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h
index cc6e2cab36e9..60094061c102 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ struct msm_dp {
 	struct platform_device *pdev;
 	struct drm_connector *connector;
 	struct drm_bridge *next_bridge;
+	struct drm_bridge *bridge;
 	bool link_ready;
 	bool audio_enabled;
 	bool power_on;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c
index e4622c85fb66..f935093c4df4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c
@@ -340,6 +340,8 @@ int msm_dp_bridge_init(struct msm_dp *msm_dp_display, struct drm_device *dev,
 		}
 	}
 
+	msm_dp_display->bridge = bridge;
+
 	return 0;
 }
 

-- 
2.47.3
Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] drm/msm/dp: Drop EV_USER_NOTIFICATION
Posted by Bjorn Andersson 3 weeks, 2 days ago
On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 09:29:10AM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> From: Jessica Zhang <jessica.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com>
> 
> Currently, we queue an event for signalling HPD connect/disconnect. This
> can mean a delay in plug/unplug handling and notifying DRM core when a
> hotplug happens.
> 
> Drop EV_USER_NOTIFICATION and signal the IRQ event as part of hotplug
> handling.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jessica Zhang <jessica.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c | 28 ++++++++--------------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c     |  2 ++
>  3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> index 3184066adb15..e0b424ac861a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> @@ -58,7 +58,6 @@ enum {
>  	EV_HPD_PLUG_INT,
>  	EV_IRQ_HPD_INT,
>  	EV_HPD_UNPLUG_INT,
> -	EV_USER_NOTIFICATION,
>  };
>  
>  #define EVENT_TIMEOUT	(HZ/10)	/* 100ms */
> @@ -343,17 +342,6 @@ static const struct component_ops msm_dp_display_comp_ops = {
>  	.unbind = msm_dp_display_unbind,
>  };
>  
> -static void msm_dp_display_send_hpd_event(struct msm_dp *msm_dp_display)
> -{
> -	struct msm_dp_display_private *dp;
> -	struct drm_connector *connector;
> -
> -	dp = container_of(msm_dp_display, struct msm_dp_display_private, msm_dp_display);
> -
> -	connector = dp->msm_dp_display.connector;
> -	drm_helper_hpd_irq_event(connector->dev);
> -}
> -
>  static int msm_dp_display_send_hpd_notification(struct msm_dp_display_private *dp,
>  					    bool hpd)
>  {
> @@ -377,7 +365,11 @@ static int msm_dp_display_send_hpd_notification(struct msm_dp_display_private *d
>  
>  	drm_dbg_dp(dp->drm_dev, "type=%d hpd=%d\n",
>  			dp->msm_dp_display.connector_type, hpd);
> -	msm_dp_display_send_hpd_event(&dp->msm_dp_display);
> +
> +	drm_bridge_hpd_notify(dp->msm_dp_display.bridge,
> +			      hpd ?
> +			      connector_status_connected :
> +			      connector_status_disconnected);

Last time we tried this, we where out of sync with the link_ready in
detect. So, I'm still wondering about that if (!link_ready) return
disconnected; in the detect function.

With a reliable detect method, this looks good though.

Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>

Regards,
Bjorn

>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -437,7 +429,7 @@ static int msm_dp_display_process_hpd_high(struct msm_dp_display_private *dp)
>  
>  	msm_dp_link_reset_phy_params_vx_px(dp->link);
>  
> -	msm_dp_add_event(dp, EV_USER_NOTIFICATION, true, 0);
> +	msm_dp_display_send_hpd_notification(dp, true);
>  
>  end:
>  	return rc;
> @@ -506,7 +498,7 @@ static int msm_dp_display_notify_disconnect(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct msm_dp_display_private *dp = dev_get_dp_display_private(dev);
>  
> -	msm_dp_add_event(dp, EV_USER_NOTIFICATION, false, 0);
> +	msm_dp_display_send_hpd_notification(dp, false);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -527,7 +519,7 @@ static int msm_dp_display_handle_port_status_changed(struct msm_dp_display_priva
>  		drm_dbg_dp(dp->drm_dev, "sink count is zero, nothing to do\n");
>  		if (dp->hpd_state != ST_DISCONNECTED) {
>  			dp->hpd_state = ST_DISCONNECT_PENDING;
> -			msm_dp_add_event(dp, EV_USER_NOTIFICATION, false, 0);
> +			msm_dp_display_send_hpd_notification(dp, false);
>  		}
>  	} else {
>  		if (dp->hpd_state == ST_DISCONNECTED) {
> @@ -1121,10 +1113,6 @@ static int hpd_event_thread(void *data)
>  		case EV_IRQ_HPD_INT:
>  			msm_dp_irq_hpd_handle(msm_dp_priv, todo->data);
>  			break;
> -		case EV_USER_NOTIFICATION:
> -			msm_dp_display_send_hpd_notification(msm_dp_priv,
> -						todo->data);
> -			break;
>  		default:
>  			break;
>  		}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h
> index cc6e2cab36e9..60094061c102 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ struct msm_dp {
>  	struct platform_device *pdev;
>  	struct drm_connector *connector;
>  	struct drm_bridge *next_bridge;
> +	struct drm_bridge *bridge;
>  	bool link_ready;
>  	bool audio_enabled;
>  	bool power_on;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c
> index e4622c85fb66..f935093c4df4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c
> @@ -340,6 +340,8 @@ int msm_dp_bridge_init(struct msm_dp *msm_dp_display, struct drm_device *dev,
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	msm_dp_display->bridge = bridge;
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> 
> -- 
> 2.47.3
> 
>
Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] drm/msm/dp: Drop EV_USER_NOTIFICATION
Posted by Konrad Dybcio 3 weeks, 3 days ago
On 1/15/26 8:29 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> From: Jessica Zhang <jessica.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com>
> 
> Currently, we queue an event for signalling HPD connect/disconnect. This
> can mean a delay in plug/unplug handling and notifying DRM core when a
> hotplug happens.
> 
> Drop EV_USER_NOTIFICATION and signal the IRQ event as part of hotplug
> handling.

IIUC, the drm_helper_hpd_irq_event() -> drm_bridge_hpd_notify() change
also prevents us from checking *all* connectors if we get *any* HPD?

Konrad
Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] drm/msm/dp: Drop EV_USER_NOTIFICATION
Posted by Dmitry Baryshkov 3 weeks, 3 days ago

On 15/01/2026 11:41, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 1/15/26 8:29 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> From: Jessica Zhang <jessica.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>
>> Currently, we queue an event for signalling HPD connect/disconnect. This
>> can mean a delay in plug/unplug handling and notifying DRM core when a
>> hotplug happens.
>>
>> Drop EV_USER_NOTIFICATION and signal the IRQ event as part of hotplug
>> handling.
> 
> IIUC, the drm_helper_hpd_irq_event() -> drm_bridge_hpd_notify() change
> also prevents us from checking *all* connectors if we get *any* HPD?

_unnecessarily_ checking all connectors if we know that HPD was here.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry
Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] drm/msm/dp: Drop EV_USER_NOTIFICATION
Posted by Konrad Dybcio 3 weeks, 3 days ago
On 1/15/26 10:42 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> 
> 
> On 15/01/2026 11:41, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 1/15/26 8:29 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> From: Jessica Zhang <jessica.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>>
>>> Currently, we queue an event for signalling HPD connect/disconnect. This
>>> can mean a delay in plug/unplug handling and notifying DRM core when a
>>> hotplug happens.
>>>
>>> Drop EV_USER_NOTIFICATION and signal the IRQ event as part of hotplug
>>> handling.
>>
>> IIUC, the drm_helper_hpd_irq_event() -> drm_bridge_hpd_notify() change
>> also prevents us from checking *all* connectors if we get *any* HPD?
> 
> _unnecessarily_ checking all connectors if we know that HPD was here.

Yeah that's what I had in mind

Acked-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>

Konrad