Hi Miquel,
On 05/02/26 23:05, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Santhosh,
>
> On 13/01/2026 at 19:46:08 +0530, Santhosh Kumar K <s-k6@ti.com> wrote:
>
>> SPI controllers may need tuning for reliable high-speed operation.
>> Without it, controllers use conservative timing that limits performance.
>>
>> Call spi_mem_execute_tuning() during probe to optimize timing for
>> the device's read and write operations. Failures are non-fatal as
>> controllers fall back to default timing.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Santhosh Kumar K <s-k6@ti.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c
>> index 0346916b032b..2a45d1047736 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c
>> @@ -1658,6 +1658,7 @@ static int spinand_probe(struct spi_mem *mem)
>> {
>> struct spinand_device *spinand;
>> struct mtd_info *mtd;
>> + struct spi_mem_op read_op, write_op;
>> int ret;
>>
>> spinand = devm_kzalloc(&mem->spi->dev, sizeof(*spinand),
>> @@ -1676,6 +1677,19 @@ static int spinand_probe(struct spi_mem *mem)
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>>
>> + read_op = *spinand->op_templates.read_cache;
>> + write_op = *spinand->op_templates.write_cache;
>
> These will become:
>
> + read_op = *spinand->op_templates->read_cache;
> + write_op = *spinand->op_templates->write_cache;
>
> after rebasing on nand/next or next -rc1.
Noted!
>
>> +
>> + ret = spi_mem_execute_tuning(mem, &read_op, &write_op);
>> + if (ret && ret != -EOPNOTSUPP) {
>> + dev_warn(&mem->spi->dev, "Failed to execute PHY tuning: %d\n",
>> + ret);
>> + /*
>> + * Tuning failure is non-fatal; the controller falls back to
>> + * default timing, reducing speed but ensuring operation.
>> + */
>> + }
>
> Can we move the comment before spi_mem_execute_timing()? Then no more
> brackets needed and it will be easier to read (imo).
Yeah, I agree on the readability concern - will move them in v3.
Thanks,
Santhosh.
>
> LGTM otherwise.
>
> Thanks,
> Miquèl