On Fri, Jan 9, 2026 at 7:48 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> wrote:
>
> Since only a single port is present, remove the inner `ports`
> parent node and just declare the single port as `port`.
>
> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173-elm.dtsi | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173-elm.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173-elm.dtsi
> index 59813fff7833..dc064cdcedb5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173-elm.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173-elm.dtsi
> @@ -206,11 +206,9 @@ target: trip-point1 {
>
> &dsi0 {
> status = "okay";
> - ports {
> - port {
> - dsi0_out: endpoint {
> - remote-endpoint = <&ps8640_in>;
> - };
Nit: while at it you could add a new line here to separate the child node
from the properties, as per the dts coding style.
Either way,
Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
> + port {
> + dsi0_out: endpoint {
> + remote-endpoint = <&ps8640_in>;
> };
> };
> };
> --
> 2.52.0
>
>