Checkpatch reports a misaligned continuation line in the

fb_tinylcd init_display() write_reg() gamma table. Align the

continuation line with the open parenthesis to match kernel style.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Mishra <chaitanyamishra.ai@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_tinylcd.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_tinylcd.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_tinylcd.c
index 9469248f2c50..60cda57bcb33 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_tinylcd.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_tinylcd.c
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static int init_display(struct fbtft_par *par)
 	write_reg(par, 0xE5, 0x00);
 	write_reg(par, 0xF0, 0x36, 0xA5, 0x53);
 	write_reg(par, 0xE0, 0x00, 0x35, 0x33, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
-		       0x00, 0x35, 0x33, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00);
+		  0x00, 0x35, 0x33, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00);
 	write_reg(par, MIPI_DCS_SET_PIXEL_FORMAT, 0x55);
 	write_reg(par, MIPI_DCS_EXIT_SLEEP_MODE);
 	udelay(250);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)

Thanks Greg,

Agreed. This change does not improve readability, and checkpatch is only a guide.
I will drop this patch.

Regards,
Chaitanya

On Thu, Jan 08, 2026 at 03:17:09PM +0530, Chaitanya Mishra wrote:
> Checkpatch reports a misaligned continuation line in the
> 
> fb_tinylcd init_display() write_reg() gamma table. Align the
> 
> continuation line with the open parenthesis to match kernel style.
> 
> No functional change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Mishra <chaitanyamishra.ai@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_tinylcd.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_tinylcd.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_tinylcd.c
> index 9469248f2c50..60cda57bcb33 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_tinylcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_tinylcd.c
> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static int init_display(struct fbtft_par *par)
>  	write_reg(par, 0xE5, 0x00);
>  	write_reg(par, 0xF0, 0x36, 0xA5, 0x53);
>  	write_reg(par, 0xE0, 0x00, 0x35, 0x33, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
> -		       0x00, 0x35, 0x33, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00);
> +		  0x00, 0x35, 0x33, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00);

That kind of makes the code harder to read, right?

checkpatch is a guide, always use it as a hint, not as a rule.

thanks,

greg k-h