drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
Change of_phy_leds() to fwnode_phy_leds(), to support
of node, acpi node, and software node together.
Signed-off-by: Jijie Shao <shaojijie@huawei.com>
---
RFC -> V1:
using fwnode_for_each_available_child_node_scoped(), suggested by Jonathan Cameron.
RFC: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251215125705.1567527-2-shaojijie@huawei.com/
---
drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
index 81984d4ebb7c..bb55caa5798f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
@@ -3208,8 +3208,8 @@ static void phy_leds_unregister(struct phy_device *phydev)
}
}
-static int of_phy_led(struct phy_device *phydev,
- struct device_node *led)
+static int fwnode_phy_led(struct phy_device *phydev,
+ struct fwnode_handle *led)
{
struct device *dev = &phydev->mdio.dev;
struct led_init_data init_data = {};
@@ -3226,17 +3226,17 @@ static int of_phy_led(struct phy_device *phydev,
cdev = &phyled->led_cdev;
phyled->phydev = phydev;
- err = of_property_read_u32(led, "reg", &index);
+ err = fwnode_property_read_u32(led, "reg", &index);
if (err)
return err;
if (index > U8_MAX)
return -EINVAL;
- if (of_property_read_bool(led, "active-high"))
+ if (fwnode_property_read_bool(led, "active-high"))
set_bit(PHY_LED_ACTIVE_HIGH, &modes);
- if (of_property_read_bool(led, "active-low"))
+ if (fwnode_property_read_bool(led, "active-low"))
set_bit(PHY_LED_ACTIVE_LOW, &modes);
- if (of_property_read_bool(led, "inactive-high-impedance"))
+ if (fwnode_property_read_bool(led, "inactive-high-impedance"))
set_bit(PHY_LED_INACTIVE_HIGH_IMPEDANCE, &modes);
if (WARN_ON(modes & BIT(PHY_LED_ACTIVE_LOW) &&
@@ -3273,7 +3273,7 @@ static int of_phy_led(struct phy_device *phydev,
#endif
cdev->max_brightness = 1;
init_data.devicename = dev_name(&phydev->mdio.dev);
- init_data.fwnode = of_fwnode_handle(led);
+ init_data.fwnode = led;
init_data.devname_mandatory = true;
err = led_classdev_register_ext(dev, cdev, &init_data);
@@ -3285,19 +3285,16 @@ static int of_phy_led(struct phy_device *phydev,
return 0;
}
-static int of_phy_leds(struct phy_device *phydev)
+static int fwnode_phy_leds(struct phy_device *phydev)
{
- struct device_node *node = phydev->mdio.dev.of_node;
- struct device_node *leds;
+ struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev_fwnode(&phydev->mdio.dev);
+ struct fwnode_handle *leds, *led;
int err;
- if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_MDIO))
- return 0;
-
- if (!node)
+ if (!fwnode)
return 0;
- leds = of_get_child_by_name(node, "leds");
+ leds = fwnode_get_named_child_node(fwnode, "leds");
if (!leds)
return 0;
@@ -3311,17 +3308,17 @@ static int of_phy_leds(struct phy_device *phydev)
goto exit;
}
- for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped(leds, led) {
- err = of_phy_led(phydev, led);
+ fwnode_for_each_available_child_node_scoped(leds, led) {
+ err = fwnode_phy_led(phydev, led);
if (err) {
- of_node_put(leds);
+ fwnode_handle_put(leds);
phy_leds_unregister(phydev);
return err;
}
}
exit:
- of_node_put(leds);
+ fwnode_handle_put(leds);
return 0;
}
@@ -3516,7 +3513,7 @@ static int phy_probe(struct device *dev)
* LEDs for them.
*/
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PHYLIB_LEDS) && !phy_driver_is_genphy(phydev))
- err = of_phy_leds(phydev);
+ err = fwnode_phy_leds(phydev);
out:
/* Re-assert the reset signal on error */
--
2.33.0
Hi Jijie,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on net-next/main]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jijie-Shao/net-phy-change-of_phy_leds-to-fwnode_phy_leds/20260108-153742
base: net-next/main
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260108073405.3036482-1-shaojijie%40huawei.com
patch subject: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: change of_phy_leds() to fwnode_phy_leds()
config: sh-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260114/202601141349.H2uawAfe-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: sh4-linux-gcc (GCC) 15.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260114/202601141349.H2uawAfe-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202601141349.H2uawAfe-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c: In function 'fwnode_phy_leds':
>> drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c:3291:38: warning: unused variable 'led' [-Wunused-variable]
3291 | struct fwnode_handle *leds, *led;
| ^~~
vim +/led +3291 drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
3287
3288 static int fwnode_phy_leds(struct phy_device *phydev)
3289 {
3290 struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev_fwnode(&phydev->mdio.dev);
> 3291 struct fwnode_handle *leds, *led;
3292 int err;
3293
3294 if (!fwnode)
3295 return 0;
3296
3297 leds = fwnode_get_named_child_node(fwnode, "leds");
3298 if (!leds)
3299 return 0;
3300
3301 /* Check if the PHY driver have at least an OP to
3302 * set the LEDs.
3303 */
3304 if (!(phydev->drv->led_brightness_set ||
3305 phydev->drv->led_blink_set ||
3306 phydev->drv->led_hw_control_set)) {
3307 phydev_dbg(phydev, "ignoring leds node defined with no PHY driver support\n");
3308 goto exit;
3309 }
3310
3311 fwnode_for_each_available_child_node_scoped(leds, led) {
3312 err = fwnode_phy_led(phydev, led);
3313 if (err) {
3314 fwnode_handle_put(leds);
3315 phy_leds_unregister(phydev);
3316 return err;
3317 }
3318 }
3319
3320 exit:
3321 fwnode_handle_put(leds);
3322 return 0;
3323 }
3324
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Hi Jijie,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on net-next/main]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jijie-Shao/net-phy-change-of_phy_leds-to-fwnode_phy_leds/20260108-153742
base: net-next/main
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260108073405.3036482-1-shaojijie%40huawei.com
patch subject: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: change of_phy_leds() to fwnode_phy_leds()
config: x86_64-kexec (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260109/202601090427.Duo7dPR0-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260109/202601090427.Duo7dPR0-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202601090427.Duo7dPR0-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c:3291:31: warning: unused variable 'led' [-Wunused-variable]
3291 | struct fwnode_handle *leds, *led;
| ^~~
1 warning generated.
vim +/led +3291 drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
3287
3288 static int fwnode_phy_leds(struct phy_device *phydev)
3289 {
3290 struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev_fwnode(&phydev->mdio.dev);
> 3291 struct fwnode_handle *leds, *led;
3292 int err;
3293
3294 if (!fwnode)
3295 return 0;
3296
3297 leds = fwnode_get_named_child_node(fwnode, "leds");
3298 if (!leds)
3299 return 0;
3300
3301 /* Check if the PHY driver have at least an OP to
3302 * set the LEDs.
3303 */
3304 if (!(phydev->drv->led_brightness_set ||
3305 phydev->drv->led_blink_set ||
3306 phydev->drv->led_hw_control_set)) {
3307 phydev_dbg(phydev, "ignoring leds node defined with no PHY driver support\n");
3308 goto exit;
3309 }
3310
3311 fwnode_for_each_available_child_node_scoped(leds, led) {
3312 err = fwnode_phy_led(phydev, led);
3313 if (err) {
3314 fwnode_handle_put(leds);
3315 phy_leds_unregister(phydev);
3316 return err;
3317 }
3318 }
3319
3320 exit:
3321 fwnode_handle_put(leds);
3322 return 0;
3323 }
3324
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
On Thu, Jan 08, 2026 at 03:34:05PM +0800, Jijie Shao wrote:
> Change of_phy_leds() to fwnode_phy_leds(), to support
> of node, acpi node, and software node together.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jijie Shao <shaojijie@huawei.com>
I would prefer this is part of a patchset adding full support for PHY
leds via ACPI. The binding documentation needs updates to match the
code.
Andrew
---
pw-bot: cr
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.