One of the pagemap_ioctl tests attempts to fault in pages by
memcpy()'ing them to an unused buffer. This probably worked
originally, but since commit 46036188ea1f ("selftests/mm: build with
-O2") the compiler is free to optimise away that unused buffer and
the memcpy() with it. As a result there might not be any resident
page in the mapping and the test may fail.

We don't need to copy all that memory anyway. Just fault in every
page.

Cc: Usama Anjum <Usama.Anjum@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/mm/pagemap_ioctl.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/pagemap_ioctl.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/pagemap_ioctl.c
index 2cb5441f29c7..80d7c391f8f5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/pagemap_ioctl.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/pagemap_ioctl.c
@@ -1056,7 +1056,6 @@ int sanity_tests(void)
 	struct page_region *vec;
 	char *mem, *fmem;
 	struct stat sbuf;
-	char *tmp_buf;
 
 	/* 1. wrong operation */
 	mem_size = 10 * page_size;
@@ -1167,8 +1166,7 @@ int sanity_tests(void)
 	if (fmem == MAP_FAILED)
 		ksft_exit_fail_msg("error nomem %d %s\n", errno, strerror(errno));
 
-	tmp_buf = malloc(sbuf.st_size);
-	memcpy(tmp_buf, fmem, sbuf.st_size);
+	force_read_pages_in_range(fmem, sbuf.st_size);
 
 	ret = pagemap_ioctl(fmem, sbuf.st_size, vec, vec_size, 0, 0,
 			    0, PAGEMAP_NON_WRITTEN_BITS, 0, PAGEMAP_NON_WRITTEN_BITS);
-- 
2.51.2

On 07/01/26 10:18 pm, Kevin Brodsky wrote:
> One of the pagemap_ioctl tests attempts to fault in pages by
> memcpy()'ing them to an unused buffer. This probably worked
> originally, but since commit 46036188ea1f ("selftests/mm: build with
> -O2") the compiler is free to optimise away that unused buffer and
> the memcpy() with it. As a result there might not be any resident
> page in the mapping and the test may fail.
>
> We don't need to copy all that memory anyway. Just fault in every
> page.
>
> Cc: Usama Anjum <Usama.Anjum@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>

Reviewed-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>

> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/mm/pagemap_ioctl.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/pagemap_ioctl.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/pagemap_ioctl.c
> index 2cb5441f29c7..80d7c391f8f5 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/pagemap_ioctl.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/pagemap_ioctl.c
> @@ -1056,7 +1056,6 @@ int sanity_tests(void)
>  	struct page_region *vec;
>  	char *mem, *fmem;
>  	struct stat sbuf;
> -	char *tmp_buf;
>  
>  	/* 1. wrong operation */
>  	mem_size = 10 * page_size;
> @@ -1167,8 +1166,7 @@ int sanity_tests(void)
>  	if (fmem == MAP_FAILED)
>  		ksft_exit_fail_msg("error nomem %d %s\n", errno, strerror(errno));
>  
> -	tmp_buf = malloc(sbuf.st_size);
> -	memcpy(tmp_buf, fmem, sbuf.st_size);
> +	force_read_pages_in_range(fmem, sbuf.st_size);
>  
>  	ret = pagemap_ioctl(fmem, sbuf.st_size, vec, vec_size, 0, 0,
>  			    0, PAGEMAP_NON_WRITTEN_BITS, 0, PAGEMAP_NON_WRITTEN_BITS);

On 1/7/26 17:48, Kevin Brodsky wrote:
> One of the pagemap_ioctl tests attempts to fault in pages by
> memcpy()'ing them to an unused buffer. This probably worked
> originally, but since commit 46036188ea1f ("selftests/mm: build with
> -O2") the compiler is free to optimise away that unused buffer and
> the memcpy() with it. As a result there might not be any resident
> page in the mapping and the test may fail.

Yes, I assume so. Using FORCE_READ() etc is the way to go.


Should we add

Fixes: 46036188ea1f ("selftests/mm: build with -O2")

?

Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <david@kernel.org>

-- 
Cheers

David

On 19/01/2026 12:09, David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) wrote:
> On 1/7/26 17:48, Kevin Brodsky wrote:
>> One of the pagemap_ioctl tests attempts to fault in pages by
>> memcpy()'ing them to an unused buffer. This probably worked
>> originally, but since commit 46036188ea1f ("selftests/mm: build with
>> -O2") the compiler is free to optimise away that unused buffer and
>> the memcpy() with it. As a result there might not be any resident
>> page in the mapping and the test may fail.
>
> Yes, I assume so. Using FORCE_READ() etc is the way to go.
>
>
> Should we add
>
> Fixes: 46036188ea1f ("selftests/mm: build with -O2") 

Yes that seems reasonable, the test was arguably broken to start with
but it is this commit that revealed it ;)

- Kevin