OrangePi 6 Plus adopts CIX CD8180/CD8160 SoC, built-in 12-core 64-bit
processor + NPU processor,integrated graphics processor, equipped with
16GB/32GB/64GB LPDDR5, and provides two M.2 KEY-M interfaces 2280 for NVMe
SSD,as well as SPI FLASH and TF slots to meet the needs of fast read/write
and high-capacity storage

Signed-off-by: Gary Yang <gary.yang@cixtech.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cix.yaml | 11 +++++++++--
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cix.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cix.yaml
index 114dab4bc4d2..9e132e609b7b 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cix.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cix.yaml
@@ -16,9 +16,16 @@ properties:
   compatible:
     oneOf:
 
-      - description: Radxa Orion O6
+      - description: Radxa Orion O6 board
         items:
-          - const: radxa,orion-o6
+          - enum:
+              - radxa,orion-o6
+          - const: cix,sky1
+
+      - description: Xunlong orangepi 6 plus board
+        items:
+          - enum:
+              - xunlong,orangepi-6-plus
           - const: cix,sky1
 
 additionalProperties: true
-- 
2.49.0

On Sun, Jan 04, 2026 at 03:53:59PM +0800, Gary Yang wrote:
> OrangePi 6 Plus adopts CIX CD8180/CD8160 SoC, built-in 12-core 64-bit
> processor + NPU processor,integrated graphics processor, equipped with
> 16GB/32GB/64GB LPDDR5, and provides two M.2 KEY-M interfaces 2280 for NVMe
> SSD,as well as SPI FLASH and TF slots to meet the needs of fast read/write
> and high-capacity storage
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gary Yang <gary.yang@cixtech.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cix.yaml | 11 +++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cix.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cix.yaml
> index 114dab4bc4d2..9e132e609b7b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cix.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cix.yaml
> @@ -16,9 +16,16 @@ properties:
>    compatible:
>      oneOf:
>  
> -      - description: Radxa Orion O6
> +      - description: Radxa Orion O6 board
>          items:
> -          - const: radxa,orion-o6
> +          - enum:
> +              - radxa,orion-o6
> +          - const: cix,sky1
> +
> +      - description: Xunlong orangepi 6 plus board
> +        items:
> +          - enum:
> +              - xunlong,orangepi-6-plus

Previous patch was correct, not this one.

<form letter>
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.

If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
versions of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless
patch changed significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT
bindings). Tag is "received", when provided in a message replied to you
on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no
need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer
will do that for tags received on the version they apply.

Please read:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
</form letter>

Read last sentence and linked documentation. Where did you explain
ignoring/dropping my tag?

Best regards,
Krzysztof