[PATCH v3 2/6] mm: khugepaged: refine scan progress number

Vernon Yang posted 6 patches 1 month ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v3 2/6] mm: khugepaged: refine scan progress number
Posted by Vernon Yang 1 month ago
Currently, each PMD scan always increases `progress` by HPAGE_PMD_NR,
even if only scanning a single page. By counting the actual number of
pages scanned, the `progress` is tracked accurately.

Signed-off-by: Vernon Yang <yanglincheng@kylinos.cn>
---
 mm/khugepaged.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
index 9f99f61689f8..4b124e854e2e 100644
--- a/mm/khugepaged.c
+++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
@@ -1247,7 +1247,7 @@ static int collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
 static int hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
 				   struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 				   unsigned long start_addr, bool *mmap_locked,
-				   struct collapse_control *cc)
+				   int *progress, struct collapse_control *cc)
 {
 	pmd_t *pmd;
 	pte_t *pte, *_pte;
@@ -1258,23 +1258,28 @@ static int hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
 	unsigned long addr;
 	spinlock_t *ptl;
 	int node = NUMA_NO_NODE, unmapped = 0;
+	int _progress = 0;
 
 	VM_BUG_ON(start_addr & ~HPAGE_PMD_MASK);
 
 	result = find_pmd_or_thp_or_none(mm, start_addr, &pmd);
-	if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED)
+	if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED) {
+		_progress = HPAGE_PMD_NR;
 		goto out;
+	}
 
 	memset(cc->node_load, 0, sizeof(cc->node_load));
 	nodes_clear(cc->alloc_nmask);
 	pte = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, start_addr, &ptl);
 	if (!pte) {
+		_progress = HPAGE_PMD_NR;
 		result = SCAN_NO_PTE_TABLE;
 		goto out;
 	}
 
 	for (addr = start_addr, _pte = pte; _pte < pte + HPAGE_PMD_NR;
 	     _pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
+		_progress++;
 		pte_t pteval = ptep_get(_pte);
 		if (pte_none_or_zero(pteval)) {
 			++none_or_zero;
@@ -1410,6 +1415,9 @@ static int hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
 		*mmap_locked = false;
 	}
 out:
+	if (progress)
+		*progress += _progress;
+
 	trace_mm_khugepaged_scan_pmd(mm, folio, referenced,
 				     none_or_zero, result, unmapped);
 	return result;
@@ -2287,7 +2295,7 @@ static int collapse_file(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
 
 static int hpage_collapse_scan_file(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
 				    struct file *file, pgoff_t start,
-				    struct collapse_control *cc)
+				    int *progress, struct collapse_control *cc)
 {
 	struct folio *folio = NULL;
 	struct address_space *mapping = file->f_mapping;
@@ -2295,6 +2303,7 @@ static int hpage_collapse_scan_file(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
 	int present, swap;
 	int node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
 	int result = SCAN_SUCCEED;
+	int _progress = 0;
 
 	present = 0;
 	swap = 0;
@@ -2327,6 +2336,8 @@ static int hpage_collapse_scan_file(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
 			continue;
 		}
 
+		_progress += folio_nr_pages(folio);
+
 		if (folio_order(folio) == HPAGE_PMD_ORDER &&
 		    folio->index == start) {
 			/* Maybe PMD-mapped */
@@ -2388,6 +2399,9 @@ static int hpage_collapse_scan_file(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
 		}
 	}
 
+	if (progress)
+		*progress += _progress;
+
 	trace_mm_khugepaged_scan_file(mm, folio, file, present, swap, result);
 	return result;
 }
@@ -2470,7 +2484,8 @@ static unsigned int khugepaged_scan_mm_slot(unsigned int pages, int *result,
 				mmap_read_unlock(mm);
 				mmap_locked = false;
 				*result = hpage_collapse_scan_file(mm,
-					khugepaged_scan.address, file, pgoff, cc);
+					khugepaged_scan.address, file, pgoff,
+					&progress, cc);
 				fput(file);
 				if (*result == SCAN_PTE_MAPPED_HUGEPAGE) {
 					mmap_read_lock(mm);
@@ -2484,7 +2499,8 @@ static unsigned int khugepaged_scan_mm_slot(unsigned int pages, int *result,
 				}
 			} else {
 				*result = hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(mm, vma,
-					khugepaged_scan.address, &mmap_locked, cc);
+					khugepaged_scan.address, &mmap_locked,
+					&progress, cc);
 			}
 
 			if (*result == SCAN_SUCCEED)
@@ -2492,7 +2508,6 @@ static unsigned int khugepaged_scan_mm_slot(unsigned int pages, int *result,
 
 			/* move to next address */
 			khugepaged_scan.address += HPAGE_PMD_SIZE;
-			progress += HPAGE_PMD_NR;
 			if (!mmap_locked)
 				/*
 				 * We released mmap_lock so break loop.  Note
@@ -2810,11 +2825,11 @@ int madvise_collapse(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
 			mmap_read_unlock(mm);
 			mmap_locked = false;
 			result = hpage_collapse_scan_file(mm, addr, file, pgoff,
-							  cc);
+							  NULL, cc);
 			fput(file);
 		} else {
 			result = hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(mm, vma, addr,
-							 &mmap_locked, cc);
+							 &mmap_locked, NULL, cc);
 		}
 		if (!mmap_locked)
 			*lock_dropped = true;
-- 
2.51.0
Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] mm: khugepaged: refine scan progress number
Posted by David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) 1 month ago
On 1/4/26 06:41, Vernon Yang wrote:
> Currently, each PMD scan always increases `progress` by HPAGE_PMD_NR,
> even if only scanning a single page. By counting the actual number of

"... a single pmd" ?

> pages scanned, the `progress` is tracked accurately.

"page table entries / pages scanned" ?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Vernon Yang <yanglincheng@kylinos.cn>
> ---
>   mm/khugepaged.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>   1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
> index 9f99f61689f8..4b124e854e2e 100644
> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
> @@ -1247,7 +1247,7 @@ static int collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
>   static int hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
>   				   struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>   				   unsigned long start_addr, bool *mmap_locked,
> -				   struct collapse_control *cc)
> +				   int *progress, struct collapse_control *cc)
>   {
>   	pmd_t *pmd;
>   	pte_t *pte, *_pte;
> @@ -1258,23 +1258,28 @@ static int hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
>   	unsigned long addr;
>   	spinlock_t *ptl;
>   	int node = NUMA_NO_NODE, unmapped = 0;
> +	int _progress = 0;

"cur_progress" ?

>   
>   	VM_BUG_ON(start_addr & ~HPAGE_PMD_MASK);
>   
>   	result = find_pmd_or_thp_or_none(mm, start_addr, &pmd);
> -	if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED)
> +	if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED) {
> +		_progress = HPAGE_PMD_NR;
>   		goto out;
> +	}
>   
>   	memset(cc->node_load, 0, sizeof(cc->node_load));
>   	nodes_clear(cc->alloc_nmask);
>   	pte = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, start_addr, &ptl);
>   	if (!pte) {
> +		_progress = HPAGE_PMD_NR;
>   		result = SCAN_NO_PTE_TABLE;
>   		goto out;
>   	}
>   
>   	for (addr = start_addr, _pte = pte; _pte < pte + HPAGE_PMD_NR;
>   	     _pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
> +		_progress++;
>   		pte_t pteval = ptep_get(_pte);
>   		if (pte_none_or_zero(pteval)) {
>   			++none_or_zero;
> @@ -1410,6 +1415,9 @@ static int hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
>   		*mmap_locked = false;
>   	}
>   out:
> +	if (progress)
> +		*progress += _progress;
> +
>   	trace_mm_khugepaged_scan_pmd(mm, folio, referenced,
>   				     none_or_zero, result, unmapped);
>   	return result;
> @@ -2287,7 +2295,7 @@ static int collapse_file(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>   
>   static int hpage_collapse_scan_file(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>   				    struct file *file, pgoff_t start,
> -				    struct collapse_control *cc)
> +				    int *progress, struct collapse_control *cc)
>   {
>   	struct folio *folio = NULL;
>   	struct address_space *mapping = file->f_mapping;
> @@ -2295,6 +2303,7 @@ static int hpage_collapse_scan_file(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>   	int present, swap;
>   	int node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
>   	int result = SCAN_SUCCEED;
> +	int _progress = 0;

Same here.


Not sure if it would be cleaner to just let the parent increment its 
counter and returning instead the "cur_progress" from the function.

-- 
Cheers

David
Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] mm: khugepaged: refine scan progress number
Posted by Vernon Yang 1 month ago
On Mon, Jan 05, 2026 at 05:49:22PM +0100, David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) wrote:
> On 1/4/26 06:41, Vernon Yang wrote:
> > Currently, each PMD scan always increases `progress` by HPAGE_PMD_NR,
> > even if only scanning a single page. By counting the actual number of
>
> "... a single pmd" ?
>
> > pages scanned, the `progress` is tracked accurately.
>
> "page table entries / pages scanned" ?

The single page is pte-4KB only. This patch does not change the original
semantics of "progress", it simply uses the exact number of PTEs counted
to replace HPAGE_PMD_NR.

Let me provide a detailed example:

	static int hpage_collapse_scan_pmd()
	{
		for (addr = start_addr, _pte = pte; _pte < pte + HPAGE_PMD_NR;
		     _pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
			_progress++;
			pte_t pteval = ptep_get(_pte);
			...
			if (pte_uffd_wp(pteval)) { <-- first scan hit
				result = SCAN_PTE_UFFD_WP;
				goto out_unmap;
			}
		}
	}

During the first scan, if pte_uffd_wp(pteval) is true, the loop exits
directly. In practice, only one PTE is scanned before termination.
Here, "progress += 1" reflects the actual number of PTEs scanned, but
previously "progress += HPAGE_PMD_NR" always.

Previously discussed, just skip SCAN_PMD_MAPPED or SCAN_NO_PTE_TABLE,
currently in Patch #3, not this Patch #2.

> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vernon Yang <yanglincheng@kylinos.cn>
> > ---
> >   mm/khugepaged.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >   1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
> > index 9f99f61689f8..4b124e854e2e 100644
> > --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
> > +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
> > @@ -1247,7 +1247,7 @@ static int collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
> >   static int hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
> >   				   struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> >   				   unsigned long start_addr, bool *mmap_locked,
> > -				   struct collapse_control *cc)
> > +				   int *progress, struct collapse_control *cc)
> >   {
> >   	pmd_t *pmd;
> >   	pte_t *pte, *_pte;
> > @@ -1258,23 +1258,28 @@ static int hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
> >   	unsigned long addr;
> >   	spinlock_t *ptl;
> >   	int node = NUMA_NO_NODE, unmapped = 0;
> > +	int _progress = 0;
>
> "cur_progress" ?

Yes.

> >   	VM_BUG_ON(start_addr & ~HPAGE_PMD_MASK);
> >   	result = find_pmd_or_thp_or_none(mm, start_addr, &pmd);
> > -	if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED)
> > +	if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED) {
> > +		_progress = HPAGE_PMD_NR;
> >   		goto out;
> > +	}
> >   	memset(cc->node_load, 0, sizeof(cc->node_load));
> >   	nodes_clear(cc->alloc_nmask);
> >   	pte = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, start_addr, &ptl);
> >   	if (!pte) {
> > +		_progress = HPAGE_PMD_NR;
> >   		result = SCAN_NO_PTE_TABLE;
> >   		goto out;
> >   	}
> >   	for (addr = start_addr, _pte = pte; _pte < pte + HPAGE_PMD_NR;
> >   	     _pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
> > +		_progress++;
> >   		pte_t pteval = ptep_get(_pte);
> >   		if (pte_none_or_zero(pteval)) {
> >   			++none_or_zero;
> > @@ -1410,6 +1415,9 @@ static int hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
> >   		*mmap_locked = false;
> >   	}
> >   out:
> > +	if (progress)
> > +		*progress += _progress;
> > +
> >   	trace_mm_khugepaged_scan_pmd(mm, folio, referenced,
> >   				     none_or_zero, result, unmapped);
> >   	return result;
> > @@ -2287,7 +2295,7 @@ static int collapse_file(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> >   static int hpage_collapse_scan_file(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> >   				    struct file *file, pgoff_t start,
> > -				    struct collapse_control *cc)
> > +				    int *progress, struct collapse_control *cc)
> >   {
> >   	struct folio *folio = NULL;
> >   	struct address_space *mapping = file->f_mapping;
> > @@ -2295,6 +2303,7 @@ static int hpage_collapse_scan_file(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> >   	int present, swap;
> >   	int node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
> >   	int result = SCAN_SUCCEED;
> > +	int _progress = 0;
>
> Same here.
>
>
> Not sure if it would be cleaner to just let the parent increment its counter
> and returning instead the "cur_progress" from the function.

Both are good for me, I have implemented one version as follows, please
see if it is cleaner.

--
Thanks,
Vernon


diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
index 9f99f61689f8..4cf24553c2bd 100644
--- a/mm/khugepaged.c
+++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
@@ -1247,6 +1247,7 @@ static int collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
 static int hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
 				   struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 				   unsigned long start_addr, bool *mmap_locked,
+				   int *cur_progress,
 				   struct collapse_control *cc)
 {
 	pmd_t *pmd;
@@ -1262,19 +1263,27 @@ static int hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
 	VM_BUG_ON(start_addr & ~HPAGE_PMD_MASK);

 	result = find_pmd_or_thp_or_none(mm, start_addr, &pmd);
-	if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED)
+	if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED) {
+		if (cur_progress)
+			*cur_progress = HPAGE_PMD_NR;
 		goto out;
+	}

 	memset(cc->node_load, 0, sizeof(cc->node_load));
 	nodes_clear(cc->alloc_nmask);
 	pte = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, start_addr, &ptl);
 	if (!pte) {
+		if (cur_progress)
+			*cur_progress = HPAGE_PMD_NR;
 		result = SCAN_NO_PTE_TABLE;
 		goto out;
 	}

 	for (addr = start_addr, _pte = pte; _pte < pte + HPAGE_PMD_NR;
 	     _pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
+		if (cur_progress)
+			*cur_progress += 1;
+
 		pte_t pteval = ptep_get(_pte);
 		if (pte_none_or_zero(pteval)) {
 			++none_or_zero;
@@ -2287,6 +2296,7 @@ static int collapse_file(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,

 static int hpage_collapse_scan_file(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
 				    struct file *file, pgoff_t start,
+				    int *cur_progress,
 				    struct collapse_control *cc)
 {
 	struct folio *folio = NULL;
@@ -2327,6 +2337,9 @@ static int hpage_collapse_scan_file(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
 			continue;
 		}

+		if (cur_progress)
+			*cur_progress += folio_nr_pages(folio);
+
 		if (folio_order(folio) == HPAGE_PMD_ORDER &&
 		    folio->index == start) {
 			/* Maybe PMD-mapped */
@@ -2454,6 +2467,7 @@ static unsigned int khugepaged_scan_mm_slot(unsigned int pages, int *result,

 		while (khugepaged_scan.address < hend) {
 			bool mmap_locked = true;
+			int cur_progress = 0;

 			cond_resched();
 			if (unlikely(hpage_collapse_test_exit_or_disable(mm)))
@@ -2470,7 +2484,8 @@ static unsigned int khugepaged_scan_mm_slot(unsigned int pages, int *result,
 				mmap_read_unlock(mm);
 				mmap_locked = false;
 				*result = hpage_collapse_scan_file(mm,
-					khugepaged_scan.address, file, pgoff, cc);
+					khugepaged_scan.address, file, pgoff,
+					&cur_progress, cc);
 				fput(file);
 				if (*result == SCAN_PTE_MAPPED_HUGEPAGE) {
 					mmap_read_lock(mm);
@@ -2484,7 +2499,8 @@ static unsigned int khugepaged_scan_mm_slot(unsigned int pages, int *result,
 				}
 			} else {
 				*result = hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(mm, vma,
-					khugepaged_scan.address, &mmap_locked, cc);
+					khugepaged_scan.address, &mmap_locked,
+					&cur_progress, cc);
 			}

 			if (*result == SCAN_SUCCEED)
@@ -2492,7 +2508,7 @@ static unsigned int khugepaged_scan_mm_slot(unsigned int pages, int *result,

 			/* move to next address */
 			khugepaged_scan.address += HPAGE_PMD_SIZE;
-			progress += HPAGE_PMD_NR;
+			progress += cur_progress;
 			if (!mmap_locked)
 				/*
 				 * We released mmap_lock so break loop.  Note
@@ -2810,11 +2826,11 @@ int madvise_collapse(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
 			mmap_read_unlock(mm);
 			mmap_locked = false;
 			result = hpage_collapse_scan_file(mm, addr, file, pgoff,
-							  cc);
+							  NULL, cc);
 			fput(file);
 		} else {
 			result = hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(mm, vma, addr,
-							 &mmap_locked, cc);
+							 &mmap_locked, NULL, cc);
 		}
 		if (!mmap_locked)
 			*lock_dropped = true;
Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] mm: khugepaged: refine scan progress number
Posted by David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) 3 weeks, 5 days ago
On 1/6/26 06:55, Vernon Yang wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2026 at 05:49:22PM +0100, David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) wrote:
>> On 1/4/26 06:41, Vernon Yang wrote:
>>> Currently, each PMD scan always increases `progress` by HPAGE_PMD_NR,
>>> even if only scanning a single page. By counting the actual number of
>>
>> "... a single pmd" ?
>>
>>> pages scanned, the `progress` is tracked accurately.
>>
>> "page table entries / pages scanned" ?
> 
> The single page is pte-4KB only. This patch does not change the original
> semantics of "progress", it simply uses the exact number of PTEs counted
> to replace HPAGE_PMD_NR.

You used the right terminology: "PTEs" counted.

It could be either a page or a PTE, depending on whether we collapse an 
anon THP or an file thp.

You make it sound like we always scan pages.

[...]

> 
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vernon Yang <yanglincheng@kylinos.cn>
>>> ---
>>>    mm/khugepaged.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>>    1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
>>> index 9f99f61689f8..4b124e854e2e 100644
>>> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
>>> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
>>> @@ -1247,7 +1247,7 @@ static int collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
>>>    static int hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>>    				   struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>    				   unsigned long start_addr, bool *mmap_locked,
>>> -				   struct collapse_control *cc)
>>> +				   int *progress, struct collapse_control *cc)
>>>    {
>>>    	pmd_t *pmd;
>>>    	pte_t *pte, *_pte;
>>> @@ -1258,23 +1258,28 @@ static int hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>>    	unsigned long addr;
>>>    	spinlock_t *ptl;
>>>    	int node = NUMA_NO_NODE, unmapped = 0;
>>> +	int _progress = 0;
>>
>> "cur_progress" ?
> 
> Yes.
> 
>>>    	VM_BUG_ON(start_addr & ~HPAGE_PMD_MASK);
>>>    	result = find_pmd_or_thp_or_none(mm, start_addr, &pmd);
>>> -	if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED)
>>> +	if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED) {
>>> +		_progress = HPAGE_PMD_NR;
>>>    		goto out;
>>> +	}
>>>    	memset(cc->node_load, 0, sizeof(cc->node_load));
>>>    	nodes_clear(cc->alloc_nmask);
>>>    	pte = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, start_addr, &ptl);
>>>    	if (!pte) {
>>> +		_progress = HPAGE_PMD_NR;
>>>    		result = SCAN_NO_PTE_TABLE;
>>>    		goto out;
>>>    	}
>>>    	for (addr = start_addr, _pte = pte; _pte < pte + HPAGE_PMD_NR;
>>>    	     _pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
>>> +		_progress++;
>>>    		pte_t pteval = ptep_get(_pte);
>>>    		if (pte_none_or_zero(pteval)) {
>>>    			++none_or_zero;
>>> @@ -1410,6 +1415,9 @@ static int hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>>    		*mmap_locked = false;
>>>    	}
>>>    out:
>>> +	if (progress)
>>> +		*progress += _progress;
>>> +
>>>    	trace_mm_khugepaged_scan_pmd(mm, folio, referenced,
>>>    				     none_or_zero, result, unmapped);
>>>    	return result;
>>> @@ -2287,7 +2295,7 @@ static int collapse_file(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>>>    static int hpage_collapse_scan_file(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>>>    				    struct file *file, pgoff_t start,
>>> -				    struct collapse_control *cc)
>>> +				    int *progress, struct collapse_control *cc)
>>>    {
>>>    	struct folio *folio = NULL;
>>>    	struct address_space *mapping = file->f_mapping;
>>> @@ -2295,6 +2303,7 @@ static int hpage_collapse_scan_file(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>>>    	int present, swap;
>>>    	int node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
>>>    	int result = SCAN_SUCCEED;
>>> +	int _progress = 0;
>>
>> Same here.
>>
>>
>> Not sure if it would be cleaner to just let the parent increment its counter
>> and returning instead the "cur_progress" from the function.
> 
> Both are good for me, I have implemented one version as follows, please
> see if it is cleaner.

 From a quick glimpse looks good.

-- 
Cheers

David