Hi all,
Sorry — I mistakenly replied only to Luca off-thread earlier.
Re-sending the same note here via reply-to-all so everyone in the
thread has the context.
v3 was sent only to silence the Media CI checkpatch warning about >75
columns in the commit message. I agree that for an exact sparse
error/warning line, keeping it unwrapped makes more sense.
So: v2 keeps the original single-line SPARSE message, while v3 only
wraps that line. There are no code changes between v2 and v3.
I’ll defer to the maintainer who picks up the series — if you prefer
one over the other (v2 vs v3) I can follow that convention for the
next revision.
Luca, sorry for the extra mail — posting this publicly to keep the
discussion in one place.
Thanks,
Sun Jian
On Fri, Jan 2, 2026 at 11:53 PM Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri Jan 2, 2026 at 12:44 PM CET, Sun Jian wrote:
> > This series cleans up tegra-video SoC data declarations shared across
> > translation units by moving them to the corresponding headers, avoiding
> > local extern declarations in .c files.
> >
> > No functional change intended.
> >
> > ---
> > Changes in v3:
> > - Wrap the SPARSE warning in patch 1 commit message to <= 75 columns.
>
> My understanding and my knowledge of the common practice is that you
> shouldn't wrap lines if they are quoting a single path, log message, error
> message and the like.
>
> So I think v2 should be applied, not v3. But I'll leave the decision to
> maintainers applying the patches.
>
> Luca
>
> --
> Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com