The code just below the comment is_pro_rate_locked(), so it seems
like that was what was intended for the comment.

Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>

---
 sound/pci/ice1712/ice1724.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/sound/pci/ice1712/ice1724.c b/sound/pci/ice1712/ice1724.c
index e2dbbbfbca9f..65bf48647d08 100644
--- a/sound/pci/ice1712/ice1724.c
+++ b/sound/pci/ice1712/ice1724.c
@@ -973,7 +973,7 @@ static int set_rate_constraints(struct snd_ice1712 *ice,
 					  ice->hw_rates);
 }
 
-/* if the card has the internal rate locked (is_pro_locked), limit runtime
+/* if the card has the internal rate locked (is_pro_rate_locked), limit runtime
    hw rates to the current internal rate only.
 */
 static void constrain_rate_if_locked(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)

On Tue, 30 Dec 2025 15:01:03 +0100,
Julia Lawall wrote:
> 
> The code just below the comment is_pro_rate_locked(), so it seems
> like that was what was intended for the comment.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>

Thanks, applied to for-next branch now.


Takashi