Use scoped for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped() when iterating over
device nodes to make code a bit simpler.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-fsi.c | 7 ++-----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-fsi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-fsi.c
index e01c63d23b64..68276d195917 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-fsi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-fsi.c
@@ -531,7 +531,6 @@ static size_t fsi_spi_max_transfer_size(struct spi_device *spi)
 static int fsi_spi_probe(struct device *dev)
 {
 	int rc;
-	struct device_node *np;
 	int num_controllers_registered = 0;
 	struct fsi2spi *bridge;
 	struct fsi_device *fsi = to_fsi_dev(dev);
@@ -547,7 +546,7 @@ static int fsi_spi_probe(struct device *dev)
 	bridge->fsi = fsi;
 	mutex_init(&bridge->lock);
 
-	for_each_available_child_of_node(dev->of_node, np) {
+	for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped(dev->of_node, np) {
 		u32 base;
 		struct fsi_spi *ctx;
 		struct spi_controller *ctlr;
@@ -556,10 +555,8 @@ static int fsi_spi_probe(struct device *dev)
 			continue;
 
 		ctlr = spi_alloc_host(dev, sizeof(*ctx));
-		if (!ctlr) {
-			of_node_put(np);
+		if (!ctlr)
 			break;
-		}
 
 		ctlr->dev.of_node = np;
 		ctlr->num_chipselect = of_get_available_child_count(np) ?: 1;
-- 
2.51.0

On Wed, 24 Dec 2025 12:02:41 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Use scoped for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped() when iterating over
> device nodes to make code a bit simpler.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: fsi: Simplify with scoped for each OF child loop
      commit: a014c203b54d9013ad52ad8a531cf46e71028f2b

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark