arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa.dtsi | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
On Hamoa platforms, ADSP FastRPC should be instantiated as a secure
domain. The presence of `qcom,non-secure-domain` under the ADSP fastrpc
node causes the kernel to expose a non-secure device node, which is not
desired for Hamoa.
Signed-off-by: Jianping Li <jianping.li@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa.dtsi | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa.dtsi
index a17900eacb20..da62c5741350 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa.dtsi
@@ -4193,7 +4193,6 @@ fastrpc {
compatible = "qcom,fastrpc";
qcom,glink-channels = "fastrpcglink-apps-dsp";
label = "adsp";
- qcom,non-secure-domain;
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
--
2.43.0
On Wed, Dec 24, 2025 at 04:57:09PM +0800, Jianping Li wrote:
> On Hamoa platforms, ADSP FastRPC should be instantiated as a secure
> domain. The presence of `qcom,non-secure-domain` under the ADSP fastrpc
> node causes the kernel to expose a non-secure device node, which is not
> desired for Hamoa.
Why? You made some claims, but provided no explanation for them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jianping Li <jianping.li@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa.dtsi | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa.dtsi
> index a17900eacb20..da62c5741350 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/hamoa.dtsi
> @@ -4193,7 +4193,6 @@ fastrpc {
> compatible = "qcom,fastrpc";
> qcom,glink-channels = "fastrpcglink-apps-dsp";
> label = "adsp";
> - qcom,non-secure-domain;
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.