The code was originally written using no_64bit_msi, which restricts the
device to 32-bit MSI addresses.
Since msi_addr_mask is introduced, use DMA_BIT_MASK(40) instead of
DMA_BIT_MASK(32) here for msi_addr_mask, describing the restriction more
precisely and allowing these devices to work on platforms with MSI
doorbell address above 32-bit space, as long as it is within the
hardware restriction of 40-bit space.
Signed-off-by: Vivian Wang <wangruikang@iscas.ac.cn>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq_kms.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq_kms.c
index d550554a6f3f..ea519d43348b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq_kms.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq_kms.c
@@ -251,8 +251,8 @@ static bool radeon_msi_ok(struct radeon_device *rdev)
* IBM POWER servers, so we limit them
*/
if (rdev->family < CHIP_BONAIRE) {
- dev_info(rdev->dev, "radeon: MSI limited to 32-bit\n");
- rdev->pdev->msi_addr_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
+ dev_info(rdev->dev, "radeon: MSI limited to 40-bit\n");
+ rdev->pdev->msi_addr_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(40);
}
/* force MSI on */
--
2.51.2
On 12/24/25 04:10, Vivian Wang wrote:
> The code was originally written using no_64bit_msi, which restricts the
> device to 32-bit MSI addresses.
>
> Since msi_addr_mask is introduced, use DMA_BIT_MASK(40) instead of
> DMA_BIT_MASK(32) here for msi_addr_mask, describing the restriction more
> precisely and allowing these devices to work on platforms with MSI
> doorbell address above 32-bit space, as long as it is within the
> hardware restriction of 40-bit space.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivian Wang <wangruikang@iscas.ac.cn>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq_kms.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq_kms.c
> index d550554a6f3f..ea519d43348b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq_kms.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq_kms.c
> @@ -251,8 +251,8 @@ static bool radeon_msi_ok(struct radeon_device *rdev)
> * IBM POWER servers, so we limit them
> */
> if (rdev->family < CHIP_BONAIRE) {
> - dev_info(rdev->dev, "radeon: MSI limited to 32-bit\n");
> - rdev->pdev->msi_addr_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
> + dev_info(rdev->dev, "radeon: MSI limited to 40-bit\n");
> + rdev->pdev->msi_addr_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(40);
Well, that is not even remotely correct.
Please move that close to the dma_set_mask_and_coherent() call in radeon_device_init() (file radeon_device.c).
The check there is most likely already what you need. Should be pretty straight forward.
Regards,
Christian.
> }
>
> /* force MSI on */
>
On 1/7/26 23:20, Christian König wrote:
> On 12/24/25 04:10, Vivian Wang wrote:
>> The code was originally written using no_64bit_msi, which restricts the
>> device to 32-bit MSI addresses.
>>
>> Since msi_addr_mask is introduced, use DMA_BIT_MASK(40) instead of
>> DMA_BIT_MASK(32) here for msi_addr_mask, describing the restriction more
>> precisely and allowing these devices to work on platforms with MSI
>> doorbell address above 32-bit space, as long as it is within the
>> hardware restriction of 40-bit space.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vivian Wang <wangruikang@iscas.ac.cn>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq_kms.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq_kms.c
>> index d550554a6f3f..ea519d43348b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq_kms.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq_kms.c
>> @@ -251,8 +251,8 @@ static bool radeon_msi_ok(struct radeon_device *rdev)
>> * IBM POWER servers, so we limit them
>> */
>> if (rdev->family < CHIP_BONAIRE) {
>> - dev_info(rdev->dev, "radeon: MSI limited to 32-bit\n");
>> - rdev->pdev->msi_addr_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
>> + dev_info(rdev->dev, "radeon: MSI limited to 40-bit\n");
>> + rdev->pdev->msi_addr_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(40);
> Well, that is not even remotely correct.
>
> Please move that close to the dma_set_mask_and_coherent() call in radeon_device_init() (file radeon_device.c).
>
> The check there is most likely already what you need. Should be pretty straight forward.
Thanks. In that case, maybe this msi_addr_mask thing was overcomplicated
after all. Maybe coherent_dma_mask is just the right thing to check anyway.
I'll see if I can figure something out. Of course I need to keep the
logic for Power still working...
Vivian "dramforever" Wang
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.