net/sched/sch_netem.c | 11 +++++------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Previously, a duplication check was added to ensure that a
duplicating netem cannot exist in a tree with other netems. When
check_netem_in_tree() fails after parameter updates, the qdisc
structure is left in an inconsistent state with some new values
applied but duplicate not updated. Move the tree validation check
before modifying any qdisc parameters
v1 -> v2: Fix whitespace
---
net/sched/sch_netem.c | 11 +++++------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_netem.c b/net/sched/sch_netem.c
index 32a5f3304046..1a2b498ada83 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_netem.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_netem.c
@@ -1055,6 +1055,11 @@ static int netem_change(struct Qdisc *sch, struct nlattr *opt,
q->loss_model = CLG_RANDOM;
}
+ ret = check_netem_in_tree(sch, qopt->duplicate, extack);
+ if (ret)
+ goto unlock;
+ q->duplicate = qopt->duplicate;
+
if (delay_dist)
swap(q->delay_dist, delay_dist);
if (slot_dist)
@@ -1068,12 +1073,6 @@ static int netem_change(struct Qdisc *sch, struct nlattr *opt,
q->counter = 0;
q->loss = qopt->loss;
- ret = check_netem_in_tree(sch, qopt->duplicate, extack);
- if (ret)
- goto unlock;
-
- q->duplicate = qopt->duplicate;
-
/* for compatibility with earlier versions.
* if gap is set, need to assume 100% probability
*/
--
2.43.0
Hi Manas, On Mon, Dec 22, 2025 at 11:43:06AM +0530, Manas wrote: > Previously, a duplication check was added to ensure that a > duplicating netem cannot exist in a tree with other netems. When > check_netem_in_tree() fails after parameter updates, the qdisc > structure is left in an inconsistent state with some new values > applied but duplicate not updated. Move the tree validation check > before modifying any qdisc parameters We are reverting the check_netem_in_tree() code due to user-space breakage. I hope reverting it could also fix the bug you repported here? See: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20251227194135.1111972-3-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com/ Thanks! Cong
Hi Cong, On 12/28/25 01:19, Cong Wang wrote: > We are reverting the check_netem_in_tree() code due to user-space > breakage. I hope reverting it could also fix the bug you repported here? > > See: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20251227194135.1111972-3-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com/ > > Thanks! > Cong Reverting the above patch would fix the bug which I have reported.
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.