From: pengdonglin <pengdonglin@xiaomi.com>
Introduce two new helper functions to clarify the code and no
functional changes are introduced.
Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Cc: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
Cc: Xiaoqin Zhang <zhangxiaoqin@xiaomi.com>
Signed-off-by: pengdonglin <pengdonglin@xiaomi.com>
---
tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
index b5b0898d033d..571b72bd90b5 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
@@ -626,6 +626,16 @@ const struct btf *btf__base_btf(const struct btf *btf)
return btf->base_btf;
}
+int btf_sorted_start_id(const struct btf *btf)
+{
+ return btf->sorted_start_id;
+}
+
+bool btf_is_sorted(const struct btf *btf)
+{
+ return btf->sorted_start_id > 0;
+}
+
/* internal helper returning non-const pointer to a type */
struct btf_type *btf_type_by_id(const struct btf *btf, __u32 type_id)
{
@@ -976,11 +986,11 @@ static __s32 btf_find_by_name_kind(const struct btf *btf, int start_id,
if (kind == BTF_KIND_UNKN || strcmp(type_name, "void") == 0)
return 0;
- if (btf->sorted_start_id > 0 && type_name[0]) {
+ if (btf_is_sorted(btf) && type_name[0]) {
__s32 end_id = btf__type_cnt(btf) - 1;
/* skip anonymous types */
- start_id = max(start_id, btf->sorted_start_id);
+ start_id = max(start_id, btf_sorted_start_id(btf));
idx = btf_find_by_name_bsearch(btf, type_name, start_id, end_id);
if (unlikely(idx < 0))
return libbpf_err(-ENOENT);
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
index fc59b21b51b5..95e6848396b4 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
@@ -250,6 +250,8 @@ const struct btf_type *skip_mods_and_typedefs(const struct btf *btf, __u32 id, _
const struct btf_header *btf_header(const struct btf *btf);
void btf_set_base_btf(struct btf *btf, const struct btf *base_btf);
int btf_relocate(struct btf *btf, const struct btf *base_btf, __u32 **id_map);
+int btf_sorted_start_id(const struct btf *btf);
+bool btf_is_sorted(const struct btf *btf);
static inline enum btf_func_linkage btf_func_linkage(const struct btf_type *t)
{
--
2.34.1
On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 3:31 AM Donglin Peng <dolinux.peng@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: pengdonglin <pengdonglin@xiaomi.com>
>
> Introduce two new helper functions to clarify the code and no
> functional changes are introduced.
>
> Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
> Cc: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
> Cc: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
> Cc: Xiaoqin Zhang <zhangxiaoqin@xiaomi.com>
> Signed-off-by: pengdonglin <pengdonglin@xiaomi.com>
> ---
> tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
It just adds more functions to jump to and check what it's doing. I
don't think this adds much value, just drop this patch
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
> index b5b0898d033d..571b72bd90b5 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
> @@ -626,6 +626,16 @@ const struct btf *btf__base_btf(const struct btf *btf)
> return btf->base_btf;
> }
>
> +int btf_sorted_start_id(const struct btf *btf)
> +{
> + return btf->sorted_start_id;
> +}
> +
> +bool btf_is_sorted(const struct btf *btf)
> +{
> + return btf->sorted_start_id > 0;
> +}
> +
> /* internal helper returning non-const pointer to a type */
> struct btf_type *btf_type_by_id(const struct btf *btf, __u32 type_id)
> {
> @@ -976,11 +986,11 @@ static __s32 btf_find_by_name_kind(const struct btf *btf, int start_id,
> if (kind == BTF_KIND_UNKN || strcmp(type_name, "void") == 0)
> return 0;
>
> - if (btf->sorted_start_id > 0 && type_name[0]) {
> + if (btf_is_sorted(btf) && type_name[0]) {
> __s32 end_id = btf__type_cnt(btf) - 1;
>
> /* skip anonymous types */
> - start_id = max(start_id, btf->sorted_start_id);
> + start_id = max(start_id, btf_sorted_start_id(btf));
> idx = btf_find_by_name_bsearch(btf, type_name, start_id, end_id);
> if (unlikely(idx < 0))
> return libbpf_err(-ENOENT);
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
> index fc59b21b51b5..95e6848396b4 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
> @@ -250,6 +250,8 @@ const struct btf_type *skip_mods_and_typedefs(const struct btf *btf, __u32 id, _
> const struct btf_header *btf_header(const struct btf *btf);
> void btf_set_base_btf(struct btf *btf, const struct btf *base_btf);
> int btf_relocate(struct btf *btf, const struct btf *base_btf, __u32 **id_map);
> +int btf_sorted_start_id(const struct btf *btf);
> +bool btf_is_sorted(const struct btf *btf);
>
> static inline enum btf_func_linkage btf_func_linkage(const struct btf_type *t)
> {
> --
> 2.34.1
>
On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 8:05 AM Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 3:31 AM Donglin Peng <dolinux.peng@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: pengdonglin <pengdonglin@xiaomi.com>
> >
> > Introduce two new helper functions to clarify the code and no
> > functional changes are introduced.
> >
> > Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
> > Cc: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
> > Cc: Xiaoqin Zhang <zhangxiaoqin@xiaomi.com>
> > Signed-off-by: pengdonglin <pengdonglin@xiaomi.com>
> > ---
> > tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h | 2 ++
> > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
>
> It just adds more functions to jump to and check what it's doing. I
> don't think this adds much value, just drop this patch
Could adding the __always_inline be acceptable?
>
>
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
> > index b5b0898d033d..571b72bd90b5 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
> > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
> > @@ -626,6 +626,16 @@ const struct btf *btf__base_btf(const struct btf *btf)
> > return btf->base_btf;
> > }
> >
> > +int btf_sorted_start_id(const struct btf *btf)
> > +{
> > + return btf->sorted_start_id;
> > +}
> > +
> > +bool btf_is_sorted(const struct btf *btf)
> > +{
> > + return btf->sorted_start_id > 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > /* internal helper returning non-const pointer to a type */
> > struct btf_type *btf_type_by_id(const struct btf *btf, __u32 type_id)
> > {
> > @@ -976,11 +986,11 @@ static __s32 btf_find_by_name_kind(const struct btf *btf, int start_id,
> > if (kind == BTF_KIND_UNKN || strcmp(type_name, "void") == 0)
> > return 0;
> >
> > - if (btf->sorted_start_id > 0 && type_name[0]) {
> > + if (btf_is_sorted(btf) && type_name[0]) {
> > __s32 end_id = btf__type_cnt(btf) - 1;
> >
> > /* skip anonymous types */
> > - start_id = max(start_id, btf->sorted_start_id);
> > + start_id = max(start_id, btf_sorted_start_id(btf));
> > idx = btf_find_by_name_bsearch(btf, type_name, start_id, end_id);
> > if (unlikely(idx < 0))
> > return libbpf_err(-ENOENT);
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
> > index fc59b21b51b5..95e6848396b4 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
> > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
> > @@ -250,6 +250,8 @@ const struct btf_type *skip_mods_and_typedefs(const struct btf *btf, __u32 id, _
> > const struct btf_header *btf_header(const struct btf *btf);
> > void btf_set_base_btf(struct btf *btf, const struct btf *base_btf);
> > int btf_relocate(struct btf *btf, const struct btf *base_btf, __u32 **id_map);
> > +int btf_sorted_start_id(const struct btf *btf);
> > +bool btf_is_sorted(const struct btf *btf);
> >
> > static inline enum btf_func_linkage btf_func_linkage(const struct btf_type *t)
> > {
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
On Thu, 2025-12-18 at 19:30 +0800, Donglin Peng wrote:
> From: pengdonglin <pengdonglin@xiaomi.com>
>
> Introduce two new helper functions to clarify the code and no
> functional changes are introduced.
>
> Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
> Cc: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
> Cc: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
> Cc: Xiaoqin Zhang <zhangxiaoqin@xiaomi.com>
> Signed-off-by: pengdonglin <pengdonglin@xiaomi.com>
> ---
> tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
> index b5b0898d033d..571b72bd90b5 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
> @@ -626,6 +626,16 @@ const struct btf *btf__base_btf(const struct btf *btf)
> return btf->base_btf;
> }
>
> +int btf_sorted_start_id(const struct btf *btf)
> +{
> + return btf->sorted_start_id;
> +}
Having this function declared differently in kernel and in libbpf is a
bit confusing. Is it needed in libbpf at all?
> +bool btf_is_sorted(const struct btf *btf)
> +{
> + return btf->sorted_start_id > 0;
> +}
> +
Please squash this with the first btf_find_by_name_kind() change.
> /* internal helper returning non-const pointer to a type */
> struct btf_type *btf_type_by_id(const struct btf *btf, __u32 type_id)
> {
> @@ -976,11 +986,11 @@ static __s32 btf_find_by_name_kind(const struct btf *btf, int start_id,
> if (kind == BTF_KIND_UNKN || strcmp(type_name, "void") == 0)
> return 0;
>
> - if (btf->sorted_start_id > 0 && type_name[0]) {
> + if (btf_is_sorted(btf) && type_name[0]) {
> __s32 end_id = btf__type_cnt(btf) - 1;
>
> /* skip anonymous types */
> - start_id = max(start_id, btf->sorted_start_id);
> + start_id = max(start_id, btf_sorted_start_id(btf));
> idx = btf_find_by_name_bsearch(btf, type_name, start_id, end_id);
> if (unlikely(idx < 0))
> return libbpf_err(-ENOENT);
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
> index fc59b21b51b5..95e6848396b4 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
> @@ -250,6 +250,8 @@ const struct btf_type *skip_mods_and_typedefs(const struct btf *btf, __u32 id, _
> const struct btf_header *btf_header(const struct btf *btf);
> void btf_set_base_btf(struct btf *btf, const struct btf *base_btf);
> int btf_relocate(struct btf *btf, const struct btf *base_btf, __u32 **id_map);
> +int btf_sorted_start_id(const struct btf *btf);
> +bool btf_is_sorted(const struct btf *btf);
>
> static inline enum btf_func_linkage btf_func_linkage(const struct btf_type *t)
> {
On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 6:33 AM Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2025-12-18 at 19:30 +0800, Donglin Peng wrote:
> > From: pengdonglin <pengdonglin@xiaomi.com>
> >
> > Introduce two new helper functions to clarify the code and no
> > functional changes are introduced.
> >
> > Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
> > Cc: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
> > Cc: Xiaoqin Zhang <zhangxiaoqin@xiaomi.com>
> > Signed-off-by: pengdonglin <pengdonglin@xiaomi.com>
> > ---
> > tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h | 2 ++
> > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
> > index b5b0898d033d..571b72bd90b5 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
> > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
> > @@ -626,6 +626,16 @@ const struct btf *btf__base_btf(const struct btf *btf)
> > return btf->base_btf;
> > }
> >
> > +int btf_sorted_start_id(const struct btf *btf)
> > +{
> > + return btf->sorted_start_id;
> > +}
>
> Having this function declared differently in kernel and in libbpf is a
> bit confusing. Is it needed in libbpf at all?
Thanks. Keeping it consistent between libbpf and kernel side.
Will remove in the next version.
>
> > +bool btf_is_sorted(const struct btf *btf)
> > +{
> > + return btf->sorted_start_id > 0;
> > +}
> > +
>
> Please squash this with the first btf_find_by_name_kind() change.
Yes.
>
> > /* internal helper returning non-const pointer to a type */
> > struct btf_type *btf_type_by_id(const struct btf *btf, __u32 type_id)
> > {
> > @@ -976,11 +986,11 @@ static __s32 btf_find_by_name_kind(const struct btf *btf, int start_id,
> > if (kind == BTF_KIND_UNKN || strcmp(type_name, "void") == 0)
> > return 0;
> >
> > - if (btf->sorted_start_id > 0 && type_name[0]) {
> > + if (btf_is_sorted(btf) && type_name[0]) {
> > __s32 end_id = btf__type_cnt(btf) - 1;
> >
> > /* skip anonymous types */
> > - start_id = max(start_id, btf->sorted_start_id);
> > + start_id = max(start_id, btf_sorted_start_id(btf));
> > idx = btf_find_by_name_bsearch(btf, type_name, start_id, end_id);
> > if (unlikely(idx < 0))
> > return libbpf_err(-ENOENT);
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
> > index fc59b21b51b5..95e6848396b4 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
> > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
> > @@ -250,6 +250,8 @@ const struct btf_type *skip_mods_and_typedefs(const struct btf *btf, __u32 id, _
> > const struct btf_header *btf_header(const struct btf *btf);
> > void btf_set_base_btf(struct btf *btf, const struct btf *base_btf);
> > int btf_relocate(struct btf *btf, const struct btf *base_btf, __u32 **id_map);
> > +int btf_sorted_start_id(const struct btf *btf);
> > +bool btf_is_sorted(const struct btf *btf);
> >
> > static inline enum btf_func_linkage btf_func_linkage(const struct btf_type *t)
> > {
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.