fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Fix a -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning by initializing
the variable to NULL.
$ make CFLAGS_tree-log.o=-Wmaybe-uninitialized
In file included from fs/btrfs/ctree.h:21,
from fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:12:
fs/btrfs/accessors.h: In function 'replay_one_buffer':
fs/btrfs/accessors.h:66:16: warning: 'inode_item' may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
66 | return btrfs_get_##bits(eb, s, offsetof(type, member)); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~
fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:2803:42: note: 'inode_item' declared here
2803 | struct btrfs_inode_item *inode_item;
| ^~~~~~~~~~
Warning was found when compiling using loongarch64-gcc 12.3.1.
Signed-off-by: Qiang Ma <maqianga@uniontech.com>
---
fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
index 31edc93a383e..0d6faaaa70f1 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
@@ -2798,7 +2798,7 @@ static int replay_one_buffer(struct extent_buffer *eb,
nritems = btrfs_header_nritems(eb);
for (wc->log_slot = 0; wc->log_slot < nritems; wc->log_slot++) {
- struct btrfs_inode_item *inode_item;
+ struct btrfs_inode_item *inode_item = NULL;
btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(eb, &wc->log_key, wc->log_slot);
--
2.20.1
On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 04:16:18PM +0800, Qiang Ma wrote: > Fix a -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning by initializing > the variable to NULL. > > $ make CFLAGS_tree-log.o=-Wmaybe-uninitialized > > In file included from fs/btrfs/ctree.h:21, > from fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:12: > fs/btrfs/accessors.h: In function 'replay_one_buffer': > fs/btrfs/accessors.h:66:16: warning: 'inode_item' may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] > 66 | return btrfs_get_##bits(eb, s, offsetof(type, member)); \ > | ^~~~~~~~~~ > fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:2803:42: note: 'inode_item' declared here > 2803 | struct btrfs_inode_item *inode_item; > | ^~~~~~~~~~ > > Warning was found when compiling using loongarch64-gcc 12.3.1. We have the -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning enabled per fs/btrfs/ directory, there are no other known reports fixing the uninitialized inode_item so this might be specific to loongarch gcc 12.x. I'll add the patch to for-next as we still want to get all the warnings fixed, thanks.
在 2025/12/19 04:37, David Sterba 写道: > On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 04:16:18PM +0800, Qiang Ma wrote: >> Fix a -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning by initializing >> the variable to NULL. >> >> $ make CFLAGS_tree-log.o=-Wmaybe-uninitialized >> >> In file included from fs/btrfs/ctree.h:21, >> from fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:12: >> fs/btrfs/accessors.h: In function 'replay_one_buffer': >> fs/btrfs/accessors.h:66:16: warning: 'inode_item' may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] >> 66 | return btrfs_get_##bits(eb, s, offsetof(type, member)); \ >> | ^~~~~~~~~~ >> fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:2803:42: note: 'inode_item' declared here >> 2803 | struct btrfs_inode_item *inode_item; >> | ^~~~~~~~~~ >> >> Warning was found when compiling using loongarch64-gcc 12.3.1. > We have the -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning enabled per fs/btrfs/ > directory, there are no other known reports fixing the uninitialized > inode_item so this might be specific to loongarch gcc 12.x. I'll add the Yes, x86 and arm64 did not report this warning issue. > patch to for-next as we still want to get all the warnings fixed, thanks. >
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.