arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_tlb.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Upcoming KUnit tests will call lazy_mmu_mode_{enable,disable}.
These tests may be built as a module, and because of inlining this
means that symbols referenced by arch_{enter,leave}_lazy_mmu_mode
need to be exported.
Suggested-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Suggested-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
---
Andrew, please add this patch just before the last patch in the series
("mm: Add basic tests for lazy_mmu"). Thanks!
---
arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_tlb.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_tlb.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_tlb.c
index fbdeb8981ae7..9e622519a423 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_tlb.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_tlb.c
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
#include <trace/events/thp.h>
DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct ppc64_tlb_batch, ppc64_tlb_batch);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(ppc64_tlb_batch); /* For lazy_mmu_mode KUnit tests */
/*
* A linux PTE was changed and the corresponding hash table entry
@@ -154,6 +155,7 @@ void __flush_tlb_pending(struct ppc64_tlb_batch *batch)
flush_hash_range(i, local);
batch->index = 0;
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(__flush_tlb_pending); /* For lazy_mmu_mode KUnit tests */
void hash__tlb_flush(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
{
base-commit: 8f0b4cce4481fb22653697cced8d0d04027cb1e8
--
2.51.2
Hi Kevin,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/UPDATE-20251218-003955/Kevin-Brodsky/powerpc-64s-Do-not-re-activate-batched-TLB-flush/20251215-230757
base: the 14th patch of https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251215150323.2218608-15-kevin.brodsky%40arm.com
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251217163812.2633648-1-kevin.brodsky%40arm.com
patch subject: [PATCH] powerpc/mm: export symbols for lazy_mmu_mode KUnit tests
config: powerpc-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251222/202512220735.UL4ukFLo-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: powerpc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 15.1.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251222/202512220735.UL4ukFLo-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512220735.UL4ukFLo-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_tlb.c:33:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
33 | EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(ppc64_tlb_batch); /* For lazy_mmu_mode KUnit tests */
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_tlb.c:33:1: error: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT' [-Wimplicit-int]
arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_tlb.c:33:1: error: parameter names (without types) in function declaration [-Wdeclaration-missing-parameter-type]
arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_tlb.c:158:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
158 | EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(__flush_tlb_pending); /* For lazy_mmu_mode KUnit tests */
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_tlb.c:158:1: error: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT' [-Wimplicit-int]
arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_tlb.c:158:1: error: parameter names (without types) in function declaration [-Wdeclaration-missing-parameter-type]
vim +33 arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_tlb.c
31
32 DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct ppc64_tlb_batch, ppc64_tlb_batch);
> 33 EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(ppc64_tlb_batch); /* For lazy_mmu_mode KUnit tests */
34
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com> writes:
> Upcoming KUnit tests will call lazy_mmu_mode_{enable,disable}.
> These tests may be built as a module, and because of inlining this
> means that symbols referenced by arch_{enter,leave}_lazy_mmu_mode
> need to be exported.
>
> Suggested-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
> Suggested-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
> ---
Hi Kevin,
I guess, this can give following errors:
../arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_tlb.c:33:1: error: data definition has no type or storage class [-Werror]
33 | EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(ppc64_tlb_batch); /* For lazy_mmu_mode KUnit tests */
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_tlb.c:33:1: error: type defaults to ‘int’ in declaration of ‘EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT’ [-Werror=implicit-int]
../arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_tlb.c:33:1: error: parameter names (without types) in function declaration [-Werror]
../arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_tlb.c:158:1: error: data definition has no type or storage class [-Werror]
158 | EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(__flush_tlb_pending); /* For lazy_mmu_mode KUnit tests */
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_tlb.c:158:1: error: type defaults to ‘int’ in declaration of ‘EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT’ [-Werror=implicit-int]
../arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_tlb.c:158:1: error: parameter names (without types) in function declaration [-Werror]
AR init/built-in.a
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make[6]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.build:287: arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_tlb.o] Error 1
make[5]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.build:556: arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64] Error 2
IMO, we will need the following header in hash_tlb.c
+#include <kunit/visibility.h>
-ritesh
>
> Andrew, please add this patch just before the last patch in the series
> ("mm: Add basic tests for lazy_mmu"). Thanks!
> ---
> arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_tlb.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_tlb.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_tlb.c
> index fbdeb8981ae7..9e622519a423 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_tlb.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_tlb.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
> #include <trace/events/thp.h>
>
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct ppc64_tlb_batch, ppc64_tlb_batch);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(ppc64_tlb_batch); /* For lazy_mmu_mode KUnit tests */
>
> /*
> * A linux PTE was changed and the corresponding hash table entry
> @@ -154,6 +155,7 @@ void __flush_tlb_pending(struct ppc64_tlb_batch *batch)
> flush_hash_range(i, local);
> batch->index = 0;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(__flush_tlb_pending); /* For lazy_mmu_mode KUnit tests */
>
> void hash__tlb_flush(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
> {
>
> base-commit: 8f0b4cce4481fb22653697cced8d0d04027cb1e8
> --
> 2.51.2
On Wed, 17 Dec 2025 22:15:16 +0530 Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com> wrote: > ../arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_tlb.c:158:1: error: type defaults to ‘int’ in declaration of ‘EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT’ [-Werror=implicit-int] > ../arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_tlb.c:158:1: error: parameter names (without types) in function declaration [-Werror] > AR init/built-in.a > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors > make[6]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.build:287: arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_tlb.o] Error 1 > make[5]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.build:556: arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64] Error 2 > > > IMO, we will need the following header in hash_tlb.c > > +#include <kunit/visibility.h> Yeah, I already added Ritesh's patch which had this include, so I think we're all good now.
On 17/12/2025 18:30, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 17 Dec 2025 22:15:16 +0530 Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com> wrote: > >> ../arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_tlb.c:158:1: error: type defaults to ‘int’ in declaration of ‘EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT’ [-Werror=implicit-int] >> ../arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_tlb.c:158:1: error: parameter names (without types) in function declaration [-Werror] >> AR init/built-in.a >> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors >> make[6]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.build:287: arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_tlb.o] Error 1 >> make[5]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.build:556: arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64] Error 2 >> >> >> IMO, we will need the following header in hash_tlb.c >> >> +#include <kunit/visibility.h> Ha strange it built fine for me without it... Maybe different config options. > Yeah, I already added Ritesh's patch which had this include, so I > think we're all good now. Great thanks both! - Kevin
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.