drivers/of/property.c | 15 ++------------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
string.h now provides strends() which fulfills the same role as the
locally implemented strcmp_suffix(). Use it in of/property.c.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
drivers/of/property.c | 15 ++-------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
index 4e3524227720a..0a68223954f09 100644
--- a/drivers/of/property.c
+++ b/drivers/of/property.c
@@ -1294,17 +1294,6 @@ static struct device_node *parse_##fname(struct device_node *np, \
return parse_prop_cells(np, prop_name, index, name, cells); \
}
-static int strcmp_suffix(const char *str, const char *suffix)
-{
- unsigned int len, suffix_len;
-
- len = strlen(str);
- suffix_len = strlen(suffix);
- if (len <= suffix_len)
- return -1;
- return strcmp(str + len - suffix_len, suffix);
-}
-
/**
* parse_suffix_prop_cells - Suffix property parsing function for suppliers
*
@@ -1331,7 +1320,7 @@ static struct device_node *parse_suffix_prop_cells(struct device_node *np,
{
struct of_phandle_args sup_args;
- if (strcmp_suffix(prop_name, suffix))
+ if (strends(prop_name, suffix))
return NULL;
if (of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, prop_name, cells_name, index,
@@ -1416,7 +1405,7 @@ DEFINE_SUFFIX_PROP(gpio, "-gpio", "#gpio-cells")
static struct device_node *parse_gpios(struct device_node *np,
const char *prop_name, int index)
{
- if (!strcmp_suffix(prop_name, ",nr-gpios"))
+ if (!strends(prop_name, ",nr-gpios"))
return NULL;
return parse_suffix_prop_cells(np, prop_name, index, "-gpios",
--
2.51.0
On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 04:48:09PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> string.h now provides strends() which fulfills the same role as the
> locally implemented strcmp_suffix(). Use it in of/property.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> drivers/of/property.c | 15 ++-------------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
> index 4e3524227720a..0a68223954f09 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/property.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/property.c
> @@ -1294,17 +1294,6 @@ static struct device_node *parse_##fname(struct device_node *np, \
> return parse_prop_cells(np, prop_name, index, name, cells); \
> }
>
> -static int strcmp_suffix(const char *str, const char *suffix)
> -{
> - unsigned int len, suffix_len;
> -
> - len = strlen(str);
> - suffix_len = strlen(suffix);
> - if (len <= suffix_len)
> - return -1;
> - return strcmp(str + len - suffix_len, suffix);
> -}
> -
> /**
> * parse_suffix_prop_cells - Suffix property parsing function for suppliers
> *
> @@ -1331,7 +1320,7 @@ static struct device_node *parse_suffix_prop_cells(struct device_node *np,
> {
> struct of_phandle_args sup_args;
>
> - if (strcmp_suffix(prop_name, suffix))
> + if (strends(prop_name, suffix))
> return NULL;
>
> if (of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, prop_name, cells_name, index,
> @@ -1416,7 +1405,7 @@ DEFINE_SUFFIX_PROP(gpio, "-gpio", "#gpio-cells")
> static struct device_node *parse_gpios(struct device_node *np,
> const char *prop_name, int index)
> {
> - if (!strcmp_suffix(prop_name, ",nr-gpios"))
> + if (!strends(prop_name, ",nr-gpios"))
Don't you need to negate these?
On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 8:44 PM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 04:48:09PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > string.h now provides strends() which fulfills the same role as the
> > locally implemented strcmp_suffix(). Use it in of/property.c.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
> > ---
> > @@ -1416,7 +1405,7 @@ DEFINE_SUFFIX_PROP(gpio, "-gpio", "#gpio-cells")
> > static struct device_node *parse_gpios(struct device_node *np,
> > const char *prop_name, int index)
> > {
> > - if (!strcmp_suffix(prop_name, ",nr-gpios"))
> > + if (!strends(prop_name, ",nr-gpios"))
>
> Don't you need to negate these?
>
I'm not following, am I not negating this?
Bart
On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 1:45 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 8:44 PM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 04:48:09PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > string.h now provides strends() which fulfills the same role as the
> > > locally implemented strcmp_suffix(). Use it in of/property.c.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
> > > ---
> > > @@ -1416,7 +1405,7 @@ DEFINE_SUFFIX_PROP(gpio, "-gpio", "#gpio-cells")
> > > static struct device_node *parse_gpios(struct device_node *np,
> > > const char *prop_name, int index)
> > > {
> > > - if (!strcmp_suffix(prop_name, ",nr-gpios"))
> > > + if (!strends(prop_name, ",nr-gpios"))
> >
> > Don't you need to negate these?
> >
>
> I'm not following, am I not negating this?
strcmp() returns 0 on match. strends() returns True on match.
Rob
On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 1:58 PM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 1:45 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 8:44 PM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 04:48:09PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > > string.h now provides strends() which fulfills the same role as the
> > > > locally implemented strcmp_suffix(). Use it in of/property.c.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > @@ -1416,7 +1405,7 @@ DEFINE_SUFFIX_PROP(gpio, "-gpio", "#gpio-cells")
> > > > static struct device_node *parse_gpios(struct device_node *np,
> > > > const char *prop_name, int index)
> > > > {
> > > > - if (!strcmp_suffix(prop_name, ",nr-gpios"))
> > > > + if (!strends(prop_name, ",nr-gpios"))
> > >
> > > Don't you need to negate these?
> > >
> >
> > I'm not following, am I not negating this?
>
> strcmp() returns 0 on match. strends() returns True on match.
>
Right, I was under the impression strcmp_suffix() had the same
semantics as strends().
Will send v2.
Bart
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.