[PATCH] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Ues sync handling in rx_callback for i.MX7ULP suspend

Jacky Bai posted 1 patch 10 hours ago
drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.h |  1 +
2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
[PATCH] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Ues sync handling in rx_callback for i.MX7ULP suspend
Posted by Jacky Bai 10 hours ago
On i.MX7ULP platform, certain drivers that depend on rpmsg may need
to send an rpmsg request and receive an acknowledgment from the
remote core during the late_suspend stage. In the current imx_rproc
implementation, rx_callback defers message handling to a workqueue.
However, this deferred work may not execute before the system enters
the noirq_suspend stage. When that happens, pending mailbox IRQs
will cause the suspend sequence to abort.

To address this, handle incoming messages synchronously within
rx_callback when running on i.MX7ULP. This ensures the message is
processed immediately, allows the mailbox IRQ to be cleared in time,
and prevents suspend failures.

Signed-off-by: Jacky Bai <ping.bai@nxp.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.h |  1 +
 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
index 3be8790c14a2ccc789dd40508ec274000ec09978..1127c56388fd94f296c80db5c01a5d431d669c4d 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
 #include <linux/reboot.h>
 #include <linux/regmap.h>
 #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
+#include <linux/suspend.h>
 #include <linux/workqueue.h>
 
 #include "imx_rproc.h"
@@ -111,11 +112,13 @@ struct imx_rproc {
 	void __iomem			*rsc_table;
 	struct imx_sc_ipc		*ipc_handle;
 	struct notifier_block		rproc_nb;
+	struct notifier_block		pm_nb;
 	u32				rproc_pt;	/* partition id */
 	u32				rsrc_id;	/* resource id */
 	u32				entry;		/* cpu start address */
 	u32				core_index;
 	struct dev_pm_domain_list	*pd_list;
+	bool				use_sync_rx;
 };
 
 static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx93[] = {
@@ -725,7 +728,10 @@ static void imx_rproc_rx_callback(struct mbox_client *cl, void *msg)
 	struct rproc *rproc = dev_get_drvdata(cl->dev);
 	struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
 
-	queue_work(priv->workqueue, &priv->rproc_work);
+	if (priv->use_sync_rx)
+		idr_for_each(&rproc->notifyids, imx_rproc_notified_idr_cb, rproc);
+	else
+		queue_work(priv->workqueue, &priv->rproc_work);
 }
 
 static int imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(struct rproc *rproc, bool tx_block)
@@ -1009,6 +1015,38 @@ static int imx_rproc_sys_off_handler(struct sys_off_data *data)
 	return NOTIFY_DONE;
 }
 
+static int imx_rproc_pm_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
+	unsigned long action, void *data)
+{
+	int ret;
+	struct imx_rproc *priv = container_of(nb, struct imx_rproc, pm_nb);
+
+	imx_rproc_free_mbox(priv->rproc);
+
+	switch (action) {
+	case PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE:
+		ret = imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(priv->rproc, false);
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(&priv->rproc->dev, "Failed to request non-blocking mbox\n");
+			return NOTIFY_BAD;
+		}
+		priv->use_sync_rx = true;
+		break;
+	case PM_POST_SUSPEND:
+		ret = imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(priv->rproc, true);
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(&priv->rproc->dev, "Failed to request blocking mbox\n");
+			return NOTIFY_BAD;
+		}
+		priv->use_sync_rx = false;
+		break;
+	default:
+		break;
+	}
+
+	return NOTIFY_OK;
+}
+
 static void imx_rproc_destroy_workqueue(void *data)
 {
 	struct workqueue_struct *workqueue = data;
@@ -1103,6 +1141,13 @@ static int imx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 			return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "register restart handler failure\n");
 	}
 
+	if (dcfg->flags & IMX_RPROC_NEED_PM_SYNC) {
+		priv->pm_nb.notifier_call = imx_rproc_pm_notify;
+		ret = register_pm_notifier(&priv->pm_nb);
+		if (ret)
+			return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "register pm notifier failure\n");
+	}
+
 	pm_runtime_enable(dev);
 	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
 	if (ret)
@@ -1202,7 +1247,7 @@ static const struct imx_rproc_dcfg imx_rproc_cfg_imx8ulp = {
 static const struct imx_rproc_dcfg imx_rproc_cfg_imx7ulp = {
 	.att		= imx_rproc_att_imx7ulp,
 	.att_size	= ARRAY_SIZE(imx_rproc_att_imx7ulp),
-	.flags		= IMX_RPROC_NEED_SYSTEM_OFF,
+	.flags		= IMX_RPROC_NEED_SYSTEM_OFF | IMX_RPROC_NEED_PM_SYNC,
 };
 
 static const struct imx_rproc_dcfg imx_rproc_cfg_imx7d = {
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.h b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.h
index 1b2d9f4d6d19dcdc215be97f7e2ab3488281916a..0e3e460cef4ed9340fb4977183e03143c84764af 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.h
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.h
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ struct imx_rproc_att {
 /* dcfg flags */
 #define IMX_RPROC_NEED_SYSTEM_OFF	BIT(0)
 #define IMX_RPROC_NEED_CLKS		BIT(1)
+#define IMX_RPROC_NEED_PM_SYNC		BIT(2)
 
 struct imx_rproc_plat_ops {
 	int (*start)(struct rproc *rproc);

---
base-commit: 5ce74bc1b7cb2732b22f9c93082545bc655d6547
change-id: 20251211-imx7ulp_rproc-57999329239b

Best regards,
-- 
Jacky Bai <ping.bai@nxp.com>
Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Ues sync handling in rx_callback for i.MX7ULP suspend
Posted by Frank Li 2 hours ago
On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 03:26:05PM +0800, Jacky Bai wrote:
> On i.MX7ULP platform, certain drivers that depend on rpmsg may need
> to send an rpmsg request and receive an acknowledgment from the
> remote core during the late_suspend stage. In the current imx_rproc
> implementation, rx_callback defers message handling to a workqueue.
> However, this deferred work may not execute before the system enters
> the noirq_suspend stage. When that happens, pending mailbox IRQs
> will cause the suspend sequence to abort.
>
> To address this, handle incoming messages synchronously within
> rx_callback when running on i.MX7ULP. This ensures the message is
> processed immediately, allows the mailbox IRQ to be cleared in time,
> and prevents suspend failures.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jacky Bai <ping.bai@nxp.com>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
...
>
> -	queue_work(priv->workqueue, &priv->rproc_work);
> +	if (priv->use_sync_rx)
> +		idr_for_each(&rproc->notifyids, imx_rproc_notified_idr_cb, rproc);
> +	else
> +		queue_work(priv->workqueue, &priv->rproc_work);
>  }
>
>  static int imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(struct rproc *rproc, bool tx_block)
> @@ -1009,6 +1015,38 @@ static int imx_rproc_sys_off_handler(struct sys_off_data *data)
>  	return NOTIFY_DONE;
>  }
>
> +static int imx_rproc_pm_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
> +	unsigned long action, void *data)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +	struct imx_rproc *priv = container_of(nb, struct imx_rproc, pm_nb);

	struct imx_rproc *priv = container_of(nb, struct imx_rproc, pm_nb);
	int ret;

> +
> +	imx_rproc_free_mbox(priv->rproc);
> +
> +	switch (action) {
> +	case PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE:
> +		ret = imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(priv->rproc, false);

Any risk condition if on going message during free() and _init()?

> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(&priv->rproc->dev, "Failed to request non-blocking mbox\n");
> +			return NOTIFY_BAD;
> +		}
> +		priv->use_sync_rx = true;
> +		break;
> +	case PM_POST_SUSPEND:
> +		ret = imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(priv->rproc, true);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(&priv->rproc->dev, "Failed to request blocking mbox\n");
> +			return NOTIFY_BAD;
> +		}
> +		priv->use_sync_rx = false;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		break;

imx_rproc_free_mbox() here? if other notify comming,  mbox is free() as
expected?

Frank
> +	}
> +
> +	return NOTIFY_OK;
> +}
> +
>  static void imx_rproc_destroy_workqueue(void *data)
>  {
>  	struct workqueue_struct *workqueue = data;
> @@ -1103,6 +1141,13 @@ static int imx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  			return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "register restart handler failure\n");
>  	}
>
> +	if (dcfg->flags & IMX_RPROC_NEED_PM_SYNC) {
> +		priv->pm_nb.notifier_call = imx_rproc_pm_notify;
> +		ret = register_pm_notifier(&priv->pm_nb);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "register pm notifier failure\n");
> +	}
> +
>  	pm_runtime_enable(dev);
>  	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
>  	if (ret)
> @@ -1202,7 +1247,7 @@ static const struct imx_rproc_dcfg imx_rproc_cfg_imx8ulp = {
>  static const struct imx_rproc_dcfg imx_rproc_cfg_imx7ulp = {
>  	.att		= imx_rproc_att_imx7ulp,
>  	.att_size	= ARRAY_SIZE(imx_rproc_att_imx7ulp),
> -	.flags		= IMX_RPROC_NEED_SYSTEM_OFF,
> +	.flags		= IMX_RPROC_NEED_SYSTEM_OFF | IMX_RPROC_NEED_PM_SYNC,
>  };
>
>  static const struct imx_rproc_dcfg imx_rproc_cfg_imx7d = {
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.h b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.h
> index 1b2d9f4d6d19dcdc215be97f7e2ab3488281916a..0e3e460cef4ed9340fb4977183e03143c84764af 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.h
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.h
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ struct imx_rproc_att {
>  /* dcfg flags */
>  #define IMX_RPROC_NEED_SYSTEM_OFF	BIT(0)
>  #define IMX_RPROC_NEED_CLKS		BIT(1)
> +#define IMX_RPROC_NEED_PM_SYNC		BIT(2)
>
>  struct imx_rproc_plat_ops {
>  	int (*start)(struct rproc *rproc);
>
> ---
> base-commit: 5ce74bc1b7cb2732b22f9c93082545bc655d6547
> change-id: 20251211-imx7ulp_rproc-57999329239b
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Jacky Bai <ping.bai@nxp.com>
>