For the AST2500 the node was used for pinctrl purposes, and while the
hardware capability is also present in the AST2400 and AST2600, the
their pinctrl no relationship to it. Further, there's no corresponding
binding, remove the node for now to
eliminate the warnings.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-g4.dtsi | 5 -----
 arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-g5.dtsi | 6 ------
 arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-g6.dtsi | 5 -----
 3 files changed, 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-g4.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-g4.dtsi
index c3d4d916c69b..c0a4057fa53f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-g4.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-g4.dtsi
@@ -376,11 +376,6 @@ lpc_snoop: lpc-snoop@90 {
 					status = "disabled";
 				};
 
-				lhc: lhc@a0 {
-					compatible = "aspeed,ast2400-lhc";
-					reg = <0xa0 0x24 0xc8 0x8>;
-				};
-
 				lpc_reset: reset-controller@98 {
 					compatible = "aspeed,ast2400-lpc-reset";
 					reg = <0x98 0x4>;
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-g5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-g5.dtsi
index 1456f04c2139..086c40fd12b8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-g5.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-g5.dtsi
@@ -504,12 +504,6 @@ uart_routing: uart-routing@9c {
 					status = "disabled";
 				};
 
-				lhc: lhc@a0 {
-					compatible = "aspeed,ast2500-lhc";
-					reg = <0xa0 0x24 0xc8 0x8>;
-				};
-
-
 				ibt: ibt@140 {
 					compatible = "aspeed,ast2500-ibt-bmc";
 					reg = <0x140 0x18>;
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-g6.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-g6.dtsi
index f8662c8ac089..1ae816087f6b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-g6.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-g6.dtsi
@@ -624,11 +624,6 @@ lpc_snoop: lpc-snoop@80 {
 					status = "disabled";
 				};
 
-				lhc: lhc@a0 {
-					compatible = "aspeed,ast2600-lhc";
-					reg = <0xa0 0x24 0xc8 0x8>;
-				};
-
 				lpc_reset: reset-controller@98 {
 					compatible = "aspeed,ast2600-lpc-reset";
 					reg = <0x98 0x4>;

-- 
2.47.3

On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 2:46 AM Andrew Jeffery
<andrew@codeconstruct.com.au> wrote:
>
> For the AST2500 the node was used for pinctrl purposes, and while the
> hardware capability is also present in the AST2400 and AST2600, the
> their pinctrl no relationship to it. Further, there's no corresponding
> binding, remove the node for now to
> eliminate the warnings.

Odd line break.

>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-g4.dtsi | 5 -----
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-g5.dtsi | 6 ------
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-g6.dtsi | 5 -----
>  3 files changed, 16 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>

On Thu, 2026-01-29 at 09:16 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 2:46 AM Andrew Jeffery
> <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au> wrote:
> > 
> > For the AST2500 the node was used for pinctrl purposes, and while
> > the
> > hardware capability is also present in the AST2400 and AST2600, the
> > their pinctrl no relationship to it. Further, there's no
> > corresponding
> > binding, remove the node for now to
> > eliminate the warnings.
> 
> Odd line break.

Ha. The preceding sentence is also a mess. Not sure what happened
there. I've extracted the pinctrl-related patches to their own series
locally, I'll send that out when I have a moment.

Andrew