[RESEND x5][PATCH 0/3] test-ww_mutex improvements

John Stultz posted 3 patches 2 weeks ago
kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c | 165 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 122 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
[RESEND x5][PATCH 0/3] test-ww_mutex improvements
Posted by John Stultz 2 weeks ago
Hey all,
  Felt like yelling into the void again to resend my improvements
to the test-ww_mutex test driver. These changes have been
particularly helpful for tripping issues in the proxy-exec series.

Despite sending these a few times, I've not gotten any response.
I get its sort of a minor test driver, and isn't super urgent,
but it would be nice to move these forward upstream instead of
having them carried in one of my branches and having to remember
to pull them in when I test with vanilla upstream trees.

As always feedback would be appreciated. Do let me know if I 
hould be cc'ing someone I'm missing to get these reviewed and
eventually pulled in.

thanks
-john

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com

John Stultz (3):
  test-ww_mutex: Extend ww_mutex tests to test both classes of
    ww_mutexes
  test-ww_mutex: Move work to its own UNBOUND workqueue
  test-ww_mutex: Allow test to be run (and re-run) from userland

 kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c | 165 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 122 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

-- 
2.52.0.223.gf5cc29aaa4-goog
Re: [RESEND x5][PATCH 0/3] test-ww_mutex improvements
Posted by Peter Zijlstra 1 week, 6 days ago
On Fri, Dec 05, 2025 at 01:35:08AM +0000, John Stultz wrote:
> Hey all,
>   Felt like yelling into the void again to resend my improvements
> to the test-ww_mutex test driver. These changes have been
> particularly helpful for tripping issues in the proxy-exec series.

Right you are. I've thrown these on the pile to sort out post rc1.