[PATCH v2 3/3] of: Respect #{iommu,msi}-cells in maps

Vijayanand Jitta posted 3 patches 2 weeks, 1 day ago
[PATCH v2 3/3] of: Respect #{iommu,msi}-cells in maps
Posted by Vijayanand Jitta 2 weeks, 1 day ago
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>

So far our parsing of {iommu,msi}-map properites has always blindly
asusmed that the output specifiers will always have exactly 1 cell.
This typically does happen to be the case, but is not actually enforced
(and the PCI msi-map binding even explicitly states support for 0 or 1
cells) - as a result we've now ended up with dodgy DTs out in the field
which depend on this behaviour to map a 1-cell specifier for a 2-cell
provider, despite that being bogus per the bindings themselves.

Since there is some potential use in being able to map at least single
input IDs to multi-cell output specifiers (and properly support 0-cell
outputs as well), add support for properly parsing and using the target
nodes' #cells values, albeit with the unfortunate complication of still
having to work around expectations of the old behaviour too.

Since there are multi-cell output specifiers, the callers of of_map_id()
may need to get the exact cell output value for further processing.
Added support for that part --charan

Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vijayanand Jitta <vijayanand.jitta@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c |   3 +-
 drivers/of/base.c        | 107 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 include/linux/of.h       |  17 ++++---
 3 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
index eac62bc441c5..48759cf1d900 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
@@ -45,10 +45,11 @@ static int of_iommu_configure_dev_id(struct device_node *master_np,
 				     struct device *dev,
 				     const u32 *id)
 {
-	struct of_phandle_args iommu_spec = { .args_count = 1 };
+	struct of_phandle_args iommu_spec = {};
 	struct of_map_id_arg arg = {
 		.target = &iommu_spec.np,
 		.id_out = iommu_spec.args,
+		.map_cells = &iommu_spec.args_count,
 	};
 	int err;
 
diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
index b8f78a9e6a09..68a7d6ddba66 100644
--- a/drivers/of/base.c
+++ b/drivers/of/base.c
@@ -2045,11 +2045,30 @@ int of_find_last_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
 	return cache_level;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Some DTs have an iommu-map targeting a 2-cell IOMMU node while
+ * specifying only 1 cell. Fortunately they all consist of length == 1
+ * entries with the same target, so check for that pattern.
+ */
+static bool of_check_bad_map(const __be32 *map, int len)
+{
+	__be32 phandle = map[1];
+
+	if (len % 4)
+		return false;
+	for (int i = 0; i < len; i += 4) {
+		if (map[i + 1] != phandle || map[i + 3] != cpu_to_be32(1))
+			return false;
+	}
+	return true;
+}
+
 /**
  * of_map_id - Translate an ID through a downstream mapping.
  * @np: root complex device node.
  * @id: device ID to map.
  * @map_name: property name of the map to use.
+ * @cells_name: property name of target specifier cells.
  * @map_mask_name: optional property name of the mask to use.
  * @arg: contains the optional params, @target which is a pointer
  *	to the target device node and id_out which is a pointer
@@ -2065,18 +2084,19 @@ int of_find_last_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
  *
  * Return: 0 on success or a standard error code on failure.
  */
-int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
-	       const char *map_name, const char *map_mask_name,
-	       struct of_map_id_arg *arg)
+int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id, const char *map_name,
+	      const char *cells_name, const char *map_mask_name,
+	      struct of_map_id_arg *arg)
 {
 	u32 map_mask, masked_id;
-	int map_len;
+	int map_bytes, map_len, offset = 0;
+	bool bad_map = false;
 	const __be32 *map = NULL;
 
 	if (!np || !map_name || !arg || (!arg->target && !arg->id_out))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	map = of_get_property(np, map_name, &map_len);
+	map = of_get_property(np, map_name, &map_bytes);
 	if (!map) {
 		if (arg->target)
 			return -ENODEV;
@@ -2085,11 +2105,9 @@ int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	if (!map_len || map_len % (4 * sizeof(*map))) {
-		pr_err("%pOF: Error: Bad %s length: %d\n", np,
-			map_name, map_len);
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
+	if (map_bytes % sizeof(*map))
+		goto err_map_len;
+	map_len = map_bytes / sizeof(*map);
 
 	/* The default is to select all bits. */
 	map_mask = 0xffffffff;
@@ -2102,27 +2120,62 @@ int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
 		of_property_read_u32(np, map_mask_name, &map_mask);
 
 	masked_id = map_mask & id;
-	for ( ; map_len > 0; map_len -= 4 * sizeof(*map), map += 4) {
+	while (offset < map_len) {
 		struct device_node *phandle_node;
-		u32 id_base = be32_to_cpup(map + 0);
-		u32 phandle = be32_to_cpup(map + 1);
-		u32 out_base = be32_to_cpup(map + 2);
-		u32 id_len = be32_to_cpup(map + 3);
+		u32 id_base, phandle, cells, id_len, id_off;
+		const __be32 *out_base;
+
+		if (map_len - offset < 2)
+			goto err_map_len;
 
+		id_base = be32_to_cpup(map + offset);
 		if (id_base & ~map_mask) {
-			pr_err("%pOF: Invalid %s translation - %s-mask (0x%x) ignores id-base (0x%x)\n",
-				np, map_name, map_name,
+			pr_err("%pOF: Invalid %s translation - %s (0x%x) ignores id-base (0x%x)\n",
+				np, map_name, map_mask_name,
 				map_mask, id_base);
 			return -EFAULT;
 		}
 
-		if (masked_id < id_base || masked_id >= id_base + id_len)
-			continue;
-
+		phandle = be32_to_cpup(map + offset + 1);
 		phandle_node = of_find_node_by_phandle(phandle);
 		if (!phandle_node)
 			return -ENODEV;
 
+		if (!bad_map && of_property_read_u32(phandle_node, cells_name, &cells)) {
+			pr_err("%pOF: missing %s property\n", phandle_node, cells_name);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+
+		if (map_len - offset < 3 + cells)
+			goto err_map_len;
+
+		if (offset == 0 && cells == 2) {
+			bad_map = of_check_bad_map(map, map_len);
+			if (bad_map) {
+				pr_warn_once("%pOF: %s mismatches target %s, assuming extra cell of 0\n",
+				np, map_name, cells_name);
+				cells = 1;
+			}
+		}
+
+		out_base = map + offset + 2;
+		offset += 3 + cells;
+
+		id_len = be32_to_cpup(map + offset - 1);
+		if (id_len > 1 && cells > 1) {
+			/*
+			 * With 1 output cell we reasonably assume its value
+			 * has a linear relationship to the input; with more,
+			 * we'd need help from the provider to know what to do.
+			 */
+			pr_err("%pOF: Unsupported %s - cannot handle %d-ID range with %d-cell output specifier\n",
+				np, map_name, id_len, cells);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+		id_off = masked_id - id_base;
+		if (masked_id < id_base || id_off >= id_len)
+			continue;
+
 		if (arg->target) {
 			if (*arg->target)
 				of_node_put(phandle_node);
@@ -2133,12 +2186,14 @@ int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
 				continue;
 		}
 
-		if (arg->id_out)
-			*arg->id_out = masked_id - id_base + out_base;
+		for (int i = 0; arg->id_out && i < cells; i++)
+			arg->id_out[i] = id_off + be32_to_cpu(out_base[i]);
 
+		if (arg->map_cells)
+			*arg->map_cells = cells;
 		pr_debug("%pOF: %s, using mask %08x, id-base: %08x, out-base: %08x, length: %08x, id: %08x -> %08x\n",
-			np, map_name, map_mask, id_base, out_base,
-			id_len, id, masked_id - id_base + out_base);
+			np, map_name, map_mask, id_base, be32_to_cpup(out_base),
+			id_len, id, id_off + be32_to_cpup(out_base));
 		return 0;
 	}
 
@@ -2149,5 +2204,9 @@ int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
 	if (arg->id_out)
 		*arg->id_out = id;
 	return 0;
+
+err_map_len:
+	pr_err("%pOF: Error: Bad %s length: %d\n", np, map_name, map_bytes);
+	return -EINVAL;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_map_id);
diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
index 21bdce2b37ca..1981509c7918 100644
--- a/include/linux/of.h
+++ b/include/linux/of.h
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ struct device_node;
 struct of_map_id_arg {
 	struct device_node **target;
 	u32 *id_out;
+	u32 *map_cells;
 };
 
 struct property {
@@ -462,9 +463,9 @@ const char *of_prop_next_string(const struct property *prop, const char *cur);
 
 bool of_console_check(const struct device_node *dn, char *name, int index);
 
-int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
-	       const char *map_name, const char *map_mask_name,
-	       struct of_map_id_arg *arg);
+int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id, const char *map_name,
+	      const char *cells_name, const char *map_mask_name,
+	      struct of_map_id_arg *arg);
 
 phys_addr_t of_dma_get_max_cpu_address(struct device_node *np);
 
@@ -911,9 +912,9 @@ static inline void of_property_clear_flag(struct property *p, unsigned long flag
 {
 }
 
-static inline int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
-			     const char *map_name, const char *map_mask_name,
-			     struct of_map_id_arg *arg)
+static inline int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id, const char *map_name,
+			    const char *cells_name, const char *map_mask_name,
+			    struct of_map_id_arg *arg);
 {
 	return -EINVAL;
 }
@@ -1444,7 +1445,7 @@ static inline int of_property_read_s32(const struct device_node *np,
 static inline int of_map_iommu_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
 				  struct of_map_id_arg *arg)
 {
-	return of_map_id(np, id, "iommu-map", "iommu-map-mask", arg);
+	return of_map_id(np, id, "iommu-map", "#iommu-cells", "iommu-map-mask", arg);
 }
 
 static inline int of_map_msi_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
@@ -1455,7 +1456,7 @@ static inline int of_map_msi_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
 		.id_out = id_out,
 	};
 
-	return of_map_id(np, id, "msi-map", "msi-map-mask", &arg);
+	return of_map_id(np, id, "msi-map", "#msi-cells", "msi-map-mask", &arg);
 }
 
 #define of_for_each_phandle(it, err, np, ln, cn, cc)			\
-- 
2.34.1
Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] of: Respect #{iommu,msi}-cells in maps
Posted by Rob Herring 1 week, 2 days ago
On Thu, Dec 04, 2025 at 03:25:30PM +0530, Vijayanand Jitta wrote:
> From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> 
> So far our parsing of {iommu,msi}-map properites has always blindly
> asusmed that the output specifiers will always have exactly 1 cell.
> This typically does happen to be the case, but is not actually enforced
> (and the PCI msi-map binding even explicitly states support for 0 or 1
> cells) - as a result we've now ended up with dodgy DTs out in the field
> which depend on this behaviour to map a 1-cell specifier for a 2-cell
> provider, despite that being bogus per the bindings themselves.
> 
> Since there is some potential use in being able to map at least single
> input IDs to multi-cell output specifiers (and properly support 0-cell
> outputs as well), add support for properly parsing and using the target
> nodes' #cells values, albeit with the unfortunate complication of still
> having to work around expectations of the old behaviour too.
> 
> Since there are multi-cell output specifiers, the callers of of_map_id()
> may need to get the exact cell output value for further processing.
> Added support for that part --charan
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vijayanand Jitta <vijayanand.jitta@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c |   3 +-
>  drivers/of/base.c        | 107 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  include/linux/of.h       |  17 ++++---
>  3 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
> index eac62bc441c5..48759cf1d900 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
> @@ -45,10 +45,11 @@ static int of_iommu_configure_dev_id(struct device_node *master_np,
>  				     struct device *dev,
>  				     const u32 *id)
>  {
> -	struct of_phandle_args iommu_spec = { .args_count = 1 };
> +	struct of_phandle_args iommu_spec = {};
>  	struct of_map_id_arg arg = {
>  		.target = &iommu_spec.np,
>  		.id_out = iommu_spec.args,
> +		.map_cells = &iommu_spec.args_count,
>  	};
>  	int err;
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
> index b8f78a9e6a09..68a7d6ddba66 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
> @@ -2045,11 +2045,30 @@ int of_find_last_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
>  	return cache_level;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Some DTs have an iommu-map targeting a 2-cell IOMMU node while
> + * specifying only 1 cell. Fortunately they all consist of length == 1
> + * entries with the same target, so check for that pattern.

Can you show what a bad entry looks like here.

> + */
> +static bool of_check_bad_map(const __be32 *map, int len)
> +{
> +	__be32 phandle = map[1];
> +
> +	if (len % 4)
> +		return false;
> +	for (int i = 0; i < len; i += 4) {
> +		if (map[i + 1] != phandle || map[i + 3] != cpu_to_be32(1))

Why does the IOMMU arg cell have to be 1? The description said 'same 
target', but it is just all have an IOMMU cell value of 1?

> +			return false;
> +	}
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * of_map_id - Translate an ID through a downstream mapping.
>   * @np: root complex device node.
>   * @id: device ID to map.
>   * @map_name: property name of the map to use.
> + * @cells_name: property name of target specifier cells.
>   * @map_mask_name: optional property name of the mask to use.
>   * @arg: contains the optional params, @target which is a pointer
>   *	to the target device node and id_out which is a pointer
> @@ -2065,18 +2084,19 @@ int of_find_last_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
>   *
>   * Return: 0 on success or a standard error code on failure.
>   */
> -int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
> -	       const char *map_name, const char *map_mask_name,
> -	       struct of_map_id_arg *arg)
> +int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id, const char *map_name,
> +	      const char *cells_name, const char *map_mask_name,
> +	      struct of_map_id_arg *arg)
>  {
>  	u32 map_mask, masked_id;
> -	int map_len;
> +	int map_bytes, map_len, offset = 0;
> +	bool bad_map = false;
>  	const __be32 *map = NULL;
>  
>  	if (!np || !map_name || !arg || (!arg->target && !arg->id_out))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	map = of_get_property(np, map_name, &map_len);
> +	map = of_get_property(np, map_name, &map_bytes);
>  	if (!map) {
>  		if (arg->target)
>  			return -ENODEV;
> @@ -2085,11 +2105,9 @@ int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!map_len || map_len % (4 * sizeof(*map))) {
> -		pr_err("%pOF: Error: Bad %s length: %d\n", np,
> -			map_name, map_len);
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
> +	if (map_bytes % sizeof(*map))
> +		goto err_map_len;
> +	map_len = map_bytes / sizeof(*map);
>  
>  	/* The default is to select all bits. */
>  	map_mask = 0xffffffff;
> @@ -2102,27 +2120,62 @@ int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
>  		of_property_read_u32(np, map_mask_name, &map_mask);
>  
>  	masked_id = map_mask & id;
> -	for ( ; map_len > 0; map_len -= 4 * sizeof(*map), map += 4) {
> +	while (offset < map_len) {
>  		struct device_node *phandle_node;
> -		u32 id_base = be32_to_cpup(map + 0);
> -		u32 phandle = be32_to_cpup(map + 1);
> -		u32 out_base = be32_to_cpup(map + 2);
> -		u32 id_len = be32_to_cpup(map + 3);
> +		u32 id_base, phandle, cells, id_len, id_off;
> +		const __be32 *out_base;
> +
> +		if (map_len - offset < 2)
> +			goto err_map_len;
>  
> +		id_base = be32_to_cpup(map + offset);
>  		if (id_base & ~map_mask) {
> -			pr_err("%pOF: Invalid %s translation - %s-mask (0x%x) ignores id-base (0x%x)\n",
> -				np, map_name, map_name,
> +			pr_err("%pOF: Invalid %s translation - %s (0x%x) ignores id-base (0x%x)\n",
> +				np, map_name, map_mask_name,
>  				map_mask, id_base);
>  			return -EFAULT;
>  		}
>  
> -		if (masked_id < id_base || masked_id >= id_base + id_len)
> -			continue;
> -
> +		phandle = be32_to_cpup(map + offset + 1);
>  		phandle_node = of_find_node_by_phandle(phandle);
>  		if (!phandle_node)
>  			return -ENODEV;
>  
> +		if (!bad_map && of_property_read_u32(phandle_node, cells_name, &cells)) {
> +			pr_err("%pOF: missing %s property\n", phandle_node, cells_name);
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (map_len - offset < 3 + cells)
> +			goto err_map_len;
> +
> +		if (offset == 0 && cells == 2) {
> +			bad_map = of_check_bad_map(map, map_len);
> +			if (bad_map) {
> +				pr_warn_once("%pOF: %s mismatches target %s, assuming extra cell of 0\n",
> +				np, map_name, cells_name);
> +				cells = 1;
> +			}
> +		}
> +
> +		out_base = map + offset + 2;
> +		offset += 3 + cells;
> +
> +		id_len = be32_to_cpup(map + offset - 1);
> +		if (id_len > 1 && cells > 1) {
> +			/*
> +			 * With 1 output cell we reasonably assume its value
> +			 * has a linear relationship to the input; with more,
> +			 * we'd need help from the provider to know what to do.
> +			 */
> +			pr_err("%pOF: Unsupported %s - cannot handle %d-ID range with %d-cell output specifier\n",
> +				np, map_name, id_len, cells);
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +		id_off = masked_id - id_base;
> +		if (masked_id < id_base || id_off >= id_len)
> +			continue;
> +
>  		if (arg->target) {
>  			if (*arg->target)
>  				of_node_put(phandle_node);
> @@ -2133,12 +2186,14 @@ int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
>  				continue;
>  		}
>  
> -		if (arg->id_out)
> -			*arg->id_out = masked_id - id_base + out_base;
> +		for (int i = 0; arg->id_out && i < cells; i++)
> +			arg->id_out[i] = id_off + be32_to_cpu(out_base[i]);
>  
> +		if (arg->map_cells)
> +			*arg->map_cells = cells;
>  		pr_debug("%pOF: %s, using mask %08x, id-base: %08x, out-base: %08x, length: %08x, id: %08x -> %08x\n",
> -			np, map_name, map_mask, id_base, out_base,
> -			id_len, id, masked_id - id_base + out_base);
> +			np, map_name, map_mask, id_base, be32_to_cpup(out_base),
> +			id_len, id, id_off + be32_to_cpup(out_base));
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -2149,5 +2204,9 @@ int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
>  	if (arg->id_out)
>  		*arg->id_out = id;
>  	return 0;
> +
> +err_map_len:
> +	pr_err("%pOF: Error: Bad %s length: %d\n", np, map_name, map_bytes);
> +	return -EINVAL;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_map_id);
> diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
> index 21bdce2b37ca..1981509c7918 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of.h
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ struct device_node;
>  struct of_map_id_arg {
>  	struct device_node **target;
>  	u32 *id_out;
> +	u32 *map_cells;
>  };
>  
>  struct property {
> @@ -462,9 +463,9 @@ const char *of_prop_next_string(const struct property *prop, const char *cur);
>  
>  bool of_console_check(const struct device_node *dn, char *name, int index);
>  
> -int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
> -	       const char *map_name, const char *map_mask_name,
> -	       struct of_map_id_arg *arg);
> +int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id, const char *map_name,
> +	      const char *cells_name, const char *map_mask_name,
> +	      struct of_map_id_arg *arg);
>  
>  phys_addr_t of_dma_get_max_cpu_address(struct device_node *np);
>  
> @@ -911,9 +912,9 @@ static inline void of_property_clear_flag(struct property *p, unsigned long flag
>  {
>  }
>  
> -static inline int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
> -			     const char *map_name, const char *map_mask_name,
> -			     struct of_map_id_arg *arg)
> +static inline int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id, const char *map_name,
> +			    const char *cells_name, const char *map_mask_name,
> +			    struct of_map_id_arg *arg);
>  {
>  	return -EINVAL;
>  }
> @@ -1444,7 +1445,7 @@ static inline int of_property_read_s32(const struct device_node *np,
>  static inline int of_map_iommu_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
>  				  struct of_map_id_arg *arg)
>  {
> -	return of_map_id(np, id, "iommu-map", "iommu-map-mask", arg);
> +	return of_map_id(np, id, "iommu-map", "#iommu-cells", "iommu-map-mask", arg);
>  }
>  
>  static inline int of_map_msi_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
> @@ -1455,7 +1456,7 @@ static inline int of_map_msi_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
>  		.id_out = id_out,
>  	};
>  
> -	return of_map_id(np, id, "msi-map", "msi-map-mask", &arg);
> +	return of_map_id(np, id, "msi-map", "#msi-cells", "msi-map-mask", &arg);

There are cases of no #msi-cells and we default to 0 cells in that case. 
Do you maintain that?

Rob
Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] of: Respect #{iommu,msi}-cells in maps
Posted by Vijayanand Jitta 1 week, 2 days ago

On 12/10/2025 1:47 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2025 at 03:25:30PM +0530, Vijayanand Jitta wrote:
>> From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
>>
>> So far our parsing of {iommu,msi}-map properites has always blindly
>> asusmed that the output specifiers will always have exactly 1 cell.
>> This typically does happen to be the case, but is not actually enforced
>> (and the PCI msi-map binding even explicitly states support for 0 or 1
>> cells) - as a result we've now ended up with dodgy DTs out in the field
>> which depend on this behaviour to map a 1-cell specifier for a 2-cell
>> provider, despite that being bogus per the bindings themselves.
>>
>> Since there is some potential use in being able to map at least single
>> input IDs to multi-cell output specifiers (and properly support 0-cell
>> outputs as well), add support for properly parsing and using the target
>> nodes' #cells values, albeit with the unfortunate complication of still
>> having to work around expectations of the old behaviour too.
>>
>> Since there are multi-cell output specifiers, the callers of of_map_id()
>> may need to get the exact cell output value for further processing.
>> Added support for that part --charan
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Vijayanand Jitta <vijayanand.jitta@oss.qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c |   3 +-
>>  drivers/of/base.c        | 107 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>  include/linux/of.h       |  17 ++++---
>>  3 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
>> index eac62bc441c5..48759cf1d900 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
>> @@ -45,10 +45,11 @@ static int of_iommu_configure_dev_id(struct device_node *master_np,
>>  				     struct device *dev,
>>  				     const u32 *id)
>>  {
>> -	struct of_phandle_args iommu_spec = { .args_count = 1 };
>> +	struct of_phandle_args iommu_spec = {};
>>  	struct of_map_id_arg arg = {
>>  		.target = &iommu_spec.np,
>>  		.id_out = iommu_spec.args,
>> +		.map_cells = &iommu_spec.args_count,
>>  	};
>>  	int err;
>>  
>> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
>> index b8f78a9e6a09..68a7d6ddba66 100644
>> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
>> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
>> @@ -2045,11 +2045,30 @@ int of_find_last_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
>>  	return cache_level;
>>  }
>>  
>> +/*
>> + * Some DTs have an iommu-map targeting a 2-cell IOMMU node while
>> + * specifying only 1 cell. Fortunately they all consist of length == 1
>> + * entries with the same target, so check for that pattern.
> 
> Can you show what a bad entry looks like here.
> 

Sure, will add an example in the comments. Basically it would look like below.

for iommu with iommu-cells  = <2>;

Device having below iommu-map property.

iommu-map = <0x0000  &smmu  0x0000  0x1>,
            <0x0100  &smmu  0x0100  0x1>;

>> + */
>> +static bool of_check_bad_map(const __be32 *map, int len)
>> +{
>> +	__be32 phandle = map[1];
>> +
>> +	if (len % 4)
>> +		return false;
>> +	for (int i = 0; i < len; i += 4) {
>> +		if (map[i + 1] != phandle || map[i + 3] != cpu_to_be32(1))
> 
> Why does the IOMMU arg cell have to be 1? The description said 'same 
> target', but it is just all have an IOMMU cell value of 1?
> 

Here, the check is for length argument to be 1. This is to maintain backward
compatibility as mentioned above, as all such bad entries right now have
length as 1.

>> +			return false;
>> +	}
>> +	return true;
>> +}
>> +
>>  /**
>>   * of_map_id - Translate an ID through a downstream mapping.
>>   * @np: root complex device node.
>>   * @id: device ID to map.
>>   * @map_name: property name of the map to use.
>> + * @cells_name: property name of target specifier cells.
>>   * @map_mask_name: optional property name of the mask to use.
>>   * @arg: contains the optional params, @target which is a pointer
>>   *	to the target device node and id_out which is a pointer
>> @@ -2065,18 +2084,19 @@ int of_find_last_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
>>   *
>>   * Return: 0 on success or a standard error code on failure.
>>   */
>> -int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
>> -	       const char *map_name, const char *map_mask_name,
>> -	       struct of_map_id_arg *arg)
>> +int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id, const char *map_name,
>> +	      const char *cells_name, const char *map_mask_name,
>> +	      struct of_map_id_arg *arg)
>>  {
>>  	u32 map_mask, masked_id;
>> -	int map_len;
>> +	int map_bytes, map_len, offset = 0;
>> +	bool bad_map = false;
>>  	const __be32 *map = NULL;
>>  
>>  	if (!np || !map_name || !arg || (!arg->target && !arg->id_out))
>>  		return -EINVAL;
>>  
>> -	map = of_get_property(np, map_name, &map_len);
>> +	map = of_get_property(np, map_name, &map_bytes);
>>  	if (!map) {
>>  		if (arg->target)
>>  			return -ENODEV;
>> @@ -2085,11 +2105,9 @@ int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
>>  		return 0;
>>  	}
>>  
>> -	if (!map_len || map_len % (4 * sizeof(*map))) {
>> -		pr_err("%pOF: Error: Bad %s length: %d\n", np,
>> -			map_name, map_len);
>> -		return -EINVAL;
>> -	}
>> +	if (map_bytes % sizeof(*map))
>> +		goto err_map_len;
>> +	map_len = map_bytes / sizeof(*map);
>>  
>>  	/* The default is to select all bits. */
>>  	map_mask = 0xffffffff;
>> @@ -2102,27 +2120,62 @@ int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
>>  		of_property_read_u32(np, map_mask_name, &map_mask);
>>  
>>  	masked_id = map_mask & id;
>> -	for ( ; map_len > 0; map_len -= 4 * sizeof(*map), map += 4) {
>> +	while (offset < map_len) {
>>  		struct device_node *phandle_node;
>> -		u32 id_base = be32_to_cpup(map + 0);
>> -		u32 phandle = be32_to_cpup(map + 1);
>> -		u32 out_base = be32_to_cpup(map + 2);
>> -		u32 id_len = be32_to_cpup(map + 3);
>> +		u32 id_base, phandle, cells, id_len, id_off;
>> +		const __be32 *out_base;
>> +
>> +		if (map_len - offset < 2)
>> +			goto err_map_len;
>>  
>> +		id_base = be32_to_cpup(map + offset);
>>  		if (id_base & ~map_mask) {
>> -			pr_err("%pOF: Invalid %s translation - %s-mask (0x%x) ignores id-base (0x%x)\n",
>> -				np, map_name, map_name,
>> +			pr_err("%pOF: Invalid %s translation - %s (0x%x) ignores id-base (0x%x)\n",
>> +				np, map_name, map_mask_name,
>>  				map_mask, id_base);
>>  			return -EFAULT;
>>  		}
>>  
>> -		if (masked_id < id_base || masked_id >= id_base + id_len)
>> -			continue;
>> -
>> +		phandle = be32_to_cpup(map + offset + 1);
>>  		phandle_node = of_find_node_by_phandle(phandle);
>>  		if (!phandle_node)
>>  			return -ENODEV;
>>  
>> +		if (!bad_map && of_property_read_u32(phandle_node, cells_name, &cells)) {
>> +			pr_err("%pOF: missing %s property\n", phandle_node, cells_name);
>> +			return -EINVAL;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		if (map_len - offset < 3 + cells)
>> +			goto err_map_len;
>> +
>> +		if (offset == 0 && cells == 2) {
>> +			bad_map = of_check_bad_map(map, map_len);
>> +			if (bad_map) {
>> +				pr_warn_once("%pOF: %s mismatches target %s, assuming extra cell of 0\n",
>> +				np, map_name, cells_name);
>> +				cells = 1;
>> +			}
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		out_base = map + offset + 2;
>> +		offset += 3 + cells;
>> +
>> +		id_len = be32_to_cpup(map + offset - 1);
>> +		if (id_len > 1 && cells > 1) {
>> +			/*
>> +			 * With 1 output cell we reasonably assume its value
>> +			 * has a linear relationship to the input; with more,
>> +			 * we'd need help from the provider to know what to do.
>> +			 */
>> +			pr_err("%pOF: Unsupported %s - cannot handle %d-ID range with %d-cell output specifier\n",
>> +				np, map_name, id_len, cells);
>> +			return -EINVAL;
>> +		}
>> +		id_off = masked_id - id_base;
>> +		if (masked_id < id_base || id_off >= id_len)
>> +			continue;
>> +
>>  		if (arg->target) {
>>  			if (*arg->target)
>>  				of_node_put(phandle_node);
>> @@ -2133,12 +2186,14 @@ int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
>>  				continue;
>>  		}
>>  
>> -		if (arg->id_out)
>> -			*arg->id_out = masked_id - id_base + out_base;
>> +		for (int i = 0; arg->id_out && i < cells; i++)
>> +			arg->id_out[i] = id_off + be32_to_cpu(out_base[i]);
>>  
>> +		if (arg->map_cells)
>> +			*arg->map_cells = cells;
>>  		pr_debug("%pOF: %s, using mask %08x, id-base: %08x, out-base: %08x, length: %08x, id: %08x -> %08x\n",
>> -			np, map_name, map_mask, id_base, out_base,
>> -			id_len, id, masked_id - id_base + out_base);
>> +			np, map_name, map_mask, id_base, be32_to_cpup(out_base),
>> +			id_len, id, id_off + be32_to_cpup(out_base));
>>  		return 0;
>>  	}
>>  
>> @@ -2149,5 +2204,9 @@ int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
>>  	if (arg->id_out)
>>  		*arg->id_out = id;
>>  	return 0;
>> +
>> +err_map_len:
>> +	pr_err("%pOF: Error: Bad %s length: %d\n", np, map_name, map_bytes);
>> +	return -EINVAL;
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_map_id);
>> diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
>> index 21bdce2b37ca..1981509c7918 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/of.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/of.h
>> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ struct device_node;
>>  struct of_map_id_arg {
>>  	struct device_node **target;
>>  	u32 *id_out;
>> +	u32 *map_cells;
>>  };
>>  
>>  struct property {
>> @@ -462,9 +463,9 @@ const char *of_prop_next_string(const struct property *prop, const char *cur);
>>  
>>  bool of_console_check(const struct device_node *dn, char *name, int index);
>>  
>> -int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
>> -	       const char *map_name, const char *map_mask_name,
>> -	       struct of_map_id_arg *arg);
>> +int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id, const char *map_name,
>> +	      const char *cells_name, const char *map_mask_name,
>> +	      struct of_map_id_arg *arg);
>>  
>>  phys_addr_t of_dma_get_max_cpu_address(struct device_node *np);
>>  
>> @@ -911,9 +912,9 @@ static inline void of_property_clear_flag(struct property *p, unsigned long flag
>>  {
>>  }
>>  
>> -static inline int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
>> -			     const char *map_name, const char *map_mask_name,
>> -			     struct of_map_id_arg *arg)
>> +static inline int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id, const char *map_name,
>> +			    const char *cells_name, const char *map_mask_name,
>> +			    struct of_map_id_arg *arg);
>>  {
>>  	return -EINVAL;
>>  }
>> @@ -1444,7 +1445,7 @@ static inline int of_property_read_s32(const struct device_node *np,
>>  static inline int of_map_iommu_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
>>  				  struct of_map_id_arg *arg)
>>  {
>> -	return of_map_id(np, id, "iommu-map", "iommu-map-mask", arg);
>> +	return of_map_id(np, id, "iommu-map", "#iommu-cells", "iommu-map-mask", arg);
>>  }
>>  
>>  static inline int of_map_msi_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
>> @@ -1455,7 +1456,7 @@ static inline int of_map_msi_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
>>  		.id_out = id_out,
>>  	};
>>  
>> -	return of_map_id(np, id, "msi-map", "msi-map-mask", &arg);
>> +	return of_map_id(np, id, "msi-map", "#msi-cells", "msi-map-mask", &arg);
> 
> There are cases of no #msi-cells and we default to 0 cells in that case. 
> Do you maintain that?
> 
> Rob

Thanks for pointing this, I see this case of no #msi-cells is not covered. Will
add it in next revision.  Also, IIUC shouldn't we set default cells to '1' to
maintain backward compatibility of of_map_id in this case ? No ?

Thanks,
Vijay
Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] of: Respect #{iommu,msi}-cells in maps
Posted by Rob Herring 1 week, 1 day ago
On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 03:57:56PM +0530, Vijayanand Jitta wrote:
> On 12/10/2025 1:47 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 04, 2025 at 03:25:30PM +0530, Vijayanand Jitta wrote:
> >> From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> >>
> >> So far our parsing of {iommu,msi}-map properites has always blindly
> >> asusmed that the output specifiers will always have exactly 1 cell.
> >> This typically does happen to be the case, but is not actually enforced
> >> (and the PCI msi-map binding even explicitly states support for 0 or 1
> >> cells) - as a result we've now ended up with dodgy DTs out in the field
> >> which depend on this behaviour to map a 1-cell specifier for a 2-cell
> >> provider, despite that being bogus per the bindings themselves.
> >>
> >> Since there is some potential use in being able to map at least single
> >> input IDs to multi-cell output specifiers (and properly support 0-cell
> >> outputs as well), add support for properly parsing and using the target
> >> nodes' #cells values, albeit with the unfortunate complication of still
> >> having to work around expectations of the old behaviour too.
> >>
> >> Since there are multi-cell output specifiers, the callers of of_map_id()
> >> may need to get the exact cell output value for further processing.
> >> Added support for that part --charan
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Vijayanand Jitta <vijayanand.jitta@oss.qualcomm.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c |   3 +-
> >>  drivers/of/base.c        | 107 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> >>  include/linux/of.h       |  17 ++++---
> >>  3 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
> >> index eac62bc441c5..48759cf1d900 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
> >> @@ -45,10 +45,11 @@ static int of_iommu_configure_dev_id(struct device_node *master_np,
> >>  				     struct device *dev,
> >>  				     const u32 *id)
> >>  {
> >> -	struct of_phandle_args iommu_spec = { .args_count = 1 };
> >> +	struct of_phandle_args iommu_spec = {};
> >>  	struct of_map_id_arg arg = {
> >>  		.target = &iommu_spec.np,
> >>  		.id_out = iommu_spec.args,
> >> +		.map_cells = &iommu_spec.args_count,
> >>  	};
> >>  	int err;
> >>  
> >> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
> >> index b8f78a9e6a09..68a7d6ddba66 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
> >> @@ -2045,11 +2045,30 @@ int of_find_last_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
> >>  	return cache_level;
> >>  }
> >>  
> >> +/*
> >> + * Some DTs have an iommu-map targeting a 2-cell IOMMU node while
> >> + * specifying only 1 cell. Fortunately they all consist of length == 1
> >> + * entries with the same target, so check for that pattern.
> > 
> > Can you show what a bad entry looks like here.
> > 
> 
> Sure, will add an example in the comments. Basically it would look like below.
> 
> for iommu with iommu-cells  = <2>;
> 
> Device having below iommu-map property.
> 
> iommu-map = <0x0000  &smmu  0x0000  0x1>,
>             <0x0100  &smmu  0x0100  0x1>;
> 
> >> + */
> >> +static bool of_check_bad_map(const __be32 *map, int len)
> >> +{
> >> +	__be32 phandle = map[1];
> >> +
> >> +	if (len % 4)
> >> +		return false;
> >> +	for (int i = 0; i < len; i += 4) {
> >> +		if (map[i + 1] != phandle || map[i + 3] != cpu_to_be32(1))
> > 
> > Why does the IOMMU arg cell have to be 1? The description said 'same 
> > target', but it is just all have an IOMMU cell value of 1?
> > 
> 
> Here, the check is for length argument to be 1. This is to maintain backward
> compatibility as mentioned above, as all such bad entries right now have
> length as 1.

You say length and I think arg/cell length, not that the cell value 
contains a length. That's because generally cell args are provider 
defined and specific. So just say the 2nd cell has a value of 1 and 
leave out that's a length.

[...]

> >> @@ -1455,7 +1456,7 @@ static inline int of_map_msi_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
> >>  		.id_out = id_out,
> >>  	};
> >>  
> >> -	return of_map_id(np, id, "msi-map", "msi-map-mask", &arg);
> >> +	return of_map_id(np, id, "msi-map", "#msi-cells", "msi-map-mask", &arg);
> > 
> > There are cases of no #msi-cells and we default to 0 cells in that case. 
> > Do you maintain that?
> > 
> > Rob
> 
> Thanks for pointing this, I see this case of no #msi-cells is not covered. Will
> add it in next revision.  Also, IIUC shouldn't we set default cells to '1' to
> maintain backward compatibility of of_map_id in this case ? No ?

The only default is 0. Perhaps msi-map is never used if there are 0 
cells? IDK, you tell me.

Rob
Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] of: Respect #{iommu,msi}-cells in maps
Posted by Vijayanand Jitta 1 week, 1 day ago

On 12/11/2025 2:34 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 03:57:56PM +0530, Vijayanand Jitta wrote:
>> On 12/10/2025 1:47 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 04, 2025 at 03:25:30PM +0530, Vijayanand Jitta wrote:
>>>> From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
>>>>
>>>> So far our parsing of {iommu,msi}-map properites has always blindly
>>>> asusmed that the output specifiers will always have exactly 1 cell.
>>>> This typically does happen to be the case, but is not actually enforced
>>>> (and the PCI msi-map binding even explicitly states support for 0 or 1
>>>> cells) - as a result we've now ended up with dodgy DTs out in the field
>>>> which depend on this behaviour to map a 1-cell specifier for a 2-cell
>>>> provider, despite that being bogus per the bindings themselves.
>>>>
>>>> Since there is some potential use in being able to map at least single
>>>> input IDs to multi-cell output specifiers (and properly support 0-cell
>>>> outputs as well), add support for properly parsing and using the target
>>>> nodes' #cells values, albeit with the unfortunate complication of still
>>>> having to work around expectations of the old behaviour too.
>>>>
>>>> Since there are multi-cell output specifiers, the callers of of_map_id()
>>>> may need to get the exact cell output value for further processing.
>>>> Added support for that part --charan
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Vijayanand Jitta <vijayanand.jitta@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c |   3 +-
>>>>  drivers/of/base.c        | 107 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>>>  include/linux/of.h       |  17 ++++---
>>>>  3 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
>>>> index eac62bc441c5..48759cf1d900 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
>>>> @@ -45,10 +45,11 @@ static int of_iommu_configure_dev_id(struct device_node *master_np,
>>>>  				     struct device *dev,
>>>>  				     const u32 *id)
>>>>  {
>>>> -	struct of_phandle_args iommu_spec = { .args_count = 1 };
>>>> +	struct of_phandle_args iommu_spec = {};
>>>>  	struct of_map_id_arg arg = {
>>>>  		.target = &iommu_spec.np,
>>>>  		.id_out = iommu_spec.args,
>>>> +		.map_cells = &iommu_spec.args_count,
>>>>  	};
>>>>  	int err;
>>>>  
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
>>>> index b8f78a9e6a09..68a7d6ddba66 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
>>>> @@ -2045,11 +2045,30 @@ int of_find_last_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
>>>>  	return cache_level;
>>>>  }
>>>>  
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Some DTs have an iommu-map targeting a 2-cell IOMMU node while
>>>> + * specifying only 1 cell. Fortunately they all consist of length == 1
>>>> + * entries with the same target, so check for that pattern.
>>>
>>> Can you show what a bad entry looks like here.
>>>
>>
>> Sure, will add an example in the comments. Basically it would look like below.
>>
>> for iommu with iommu-cells  = <2>;
>>
>> Device having below iommu-map property.
>>
>> iommu-map = <0x0000  &smmu  0x0000  0x1>,
>>             <0x0100  &smmu  0x0100  0x1>;
>>
>>>> + */
>>>> +static bool of_check_bad_map(const __be32 *map, int len)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	__be32 phandle = map[1];
>>>> +
>>>> +	if (len % 4)
>>>> +		return false;
>>>> +	for (int i = 0; i < len; i += 4) {
>>>> +		if (map[i + 1] != phandle || map[i + 3] != cpu_to_be32(1))
>>>
>>> Why does the IOMMU arg cell have to be 1? The description said 'same 
>>> target', but it is just all have an IOMMU cell value of 1?
>>>
>>
>> Here, the check is for length argument to be 1. This is to maintain backward
>> compatibility as mentioned above, as all such bad entries right now have
>> length as 1.
> 
> You say length and I think arg/cell length, not that the cell value 
> contains a length. That's because generally cell args are provider 
> defined and specific. So just say the 2nd cell has a value of 1 and 
> leave out that's a length.
> 
> [...]
> 

Understood, will update the comment as suggested.

>>>> @@ -1455,7 +1456,7 @@ static inline int of_map_msi_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
>>>>  		.id_out = id_out,
>>>>  	};
>>>>  
>>>> -	return of_map_id(np, id, "msi-map", "msi-map-mask", &arg);
>>>> +	return of_map_id(np, id, "msi-map", "#msi-cells", "msi-map-mask", &arg);
>>>
>>> There are cases of no #msi-cells and we default to 0 cells in that case. 
>>> Do you maintain that?
>>>
>>> Rob
>>
>> Thanks for pointing this, I see this case of no #msi-cells is not covered. Will
>> add it in next revision.  Also, IIUC shouldn't we set default cells to '1' to
>> maintain backward compatibility of of_map_id in this case ? No ?
> 
> The only default is 0. Perhaps msi-map is never used if there are 0 
> cells? IDK, you tell me.
> 
> Rob

You are right, I’ve grepped through the upstream DTs that use msi-map
(Rockchip, TI K3, HiSilicon, QCom, NXP/Freescale, etc.), and I don’t
see any cases where provider uses msi-map while having #msi-cells = <0>
or omitting #msi-cells entirely.

All of the common MSI providers referenced by msi-map (GIC ITS, v2m,
etc.) define #msi-cells to 1.

So, I think the current patch should be fine as‑is, as there are no
upstream users of msi-map relying on a 0‑cell or missing #msi-cells
provider.

Thanks,
Vijay
Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] of: Respect #{iommu,msi}-cells in maps
Posted by kernel test robot 2 weeks ago
Hi Vijayanand,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on xen-tip/linux-next]
[also build test ERROR on v6.18]
[cannot apply to robh/for-next pci/next pci/for-linus linus/master next-20251204]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Vijayanand-Jitta/of-Add-convenience-wrappers-for-of_map_id/20251204-180719
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xen/tip.git linux-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251204095530.8627-4-vijayanand.jitta%40oss.qualcomm.com
patch subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] of: Respect #{iommu,msi}-cells in maps
config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-001-20251205 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251205/202512051124.ot03fX1c-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251205/202512051124.ot03fX1c-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512051124.ot03fX1c-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from kernel/sched/rq-offsets.c:5:
   In file included from kernel/sched/sched.h:31:
   In file included from include/linux/cpufreq.h:17:
>> include/linux/of.h:918:1: error: expected identifier or '('
     918 | {
         | ^
   1 error generated.
   make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:182: kernel/sched/rq-offsets.s] Error 1 shuffle=4056561518
   make[3]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
   make[2]: *** [Makefile:1280: prepare0] Error 2 shuffle=4056561518
   make[2]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
   make[1]: *** [Makefile:248: __sub-make] Error 2 shuffle=4056561518
   make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
   make: *** [Makefile:248: __sub-make] Error 2 shuffle=4056561518
   make: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.


vim +918 include/linux/of.h

0384e8c6c6fa49 Pantelis Antoniou 2015-01-21  914  
c56888c32d643b Robin Murphy      2025-12-04  915  static inline int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id, const char *map_name,
c56888c32d643b Robin Murphy      2025-12-04  916  			    const char *cells_name, const char *map_mask_name,
c56888c32d643b Robin Murphy      2025-12-04  917  			    struct of_map_id_arg *arg);
2a6db719c92dbf Nipun Gupta       2018-09-10 @918  {
2a6db719c92dbf Nipun Gupta       2018-09-10  919  	return -EINVAL;
2a6db719c92dbf Nipun Gupta       2018-09-10  920  }
2a6db719c92dbf Nipun Gupta       2018-09-10  921  

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] of: Respect #{iommu,msi}-cells in maps
Posted by kernel test robot 2 weeks ago
Hi Vijayanand,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on xen-tip/linux-next]
[also build test ERROR on v6.18]
[cannot apply to robh/for-next pci/next pci/for-linus linus/master next-20251204]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Vijayanand-Jitta/of-Add-convenience-wrappers-for-of_map_id/20251204-180719
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xen/tip.git linux-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251204095530.8627-4-vijayanand.jitta%40oss.qualcomm.com
patch subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] of: Respect #{iommu,msi}-cells in maps
config: alpha-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251205/202512051121.ivp77JHU-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: alpha-linux-gcc (GCC) 15.1.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251205/202512051121.ivp77JHU-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512051121.ivp77JHU-lkp@intel.com/

All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from include/linux/cpufreq.h:17,
                    from kernel/sched/sched.h:31,
                    from kernel/sched/rq-offsets.c:5:
>> include/linux/of.h:918:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '{' token
     918 | {
         | ^
>> include/linux/of.h:915:19: warning: 'of_map_id' used but never defined
     915 | static inline int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id, const char *map_name,
         |                   ^~~~~~~~~
   make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:182: kernel/sched/rq-offsets.s] Error 1
   make[3]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
   make[2]: *** [Makefile:1280: prepare0] Error 2
   make[2]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
   make[1]: *** [Makefile:248: __sub-make] Error 2
   make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
   make: *** [Makefile:248: __sub-make] Error 2
   make: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.


vim +918 include/linux/of.h

0384e8c6c6fa49d Pantelis Antoniou 2015-01-21  914  
c56888c32d643b3 Robin Murphy      2025-12-04 @915  static inline int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id, const char *map_name,
c56888c32d643b3 Robin Murphy      2025-12-04  916  			    const char *cells_name, const char *map_mask_name,
c56888c32d643b3 Robin Murphy      2025-12-04  917  			    struct of_map_id_arg *arg);
2a6db719c92dbfe Nipun Gupta       2018-09-10 @918  {
2a6db719c92dbfe Nipun Gupta       2018-09-10  919  	return -EINVAL;
2a6db719c92dbfe Nipun Gupta       2018-09-10  920  }
2a6db719c92dbfe Nipun Gupta       2018-09-10  921  

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] of: Respect #{iommu,msi}-cells in maps
Posted by kernel test robot 2 weeks ago
Hi Vijayanand,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on xen-tip/linux-next]
[also build test WARNING on v6.18]
[cannot apply to robh/for-next pci/next pci/for-linus linus/master next-20251204]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Vijayanand-Jitta/of-Add-convenience-wrappers-for-of_map_id/20251204-180719
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xen/tip.git linux-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251204095530.8627-4-vijayanand.jitta%40oss.qualcomm.com
patch subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] of: Respect #{iommu,msi}-cells in maps
config: arm-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251205/202512051152.PJ6mf512-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 22.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project d8b43edf552840e59a22a7f3cc332697bd434782)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251205/202512051152.PJ6mf512-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512051152.PJ6mf512-lkp@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> drivers/of/base.c:2144:7: warning: variable 'cells' is used uninitialized whenever '&&' condition is false [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
    2144 |                 if (!bad_map && of_property_read_u32(phandle_node, cells_name, &cells)) {
         |                     ^~~~~~~~
   drivers/of/base.c:2149:30: note: uninitialized use occurs here
    2149 |                 if (map_len - offset < 3 + cells)
         |                                            ^~~~~
   drivers/of/base.c:2144:7: note: remove the '&&' if its condition is always true
    2144 |                 if (!bad_map && of_property_read_u32(phandle_node, cells_name, &cells)) {
         |                     ^~~~~~~~~~~
   drivers/of/base.c:2125:30: note: initialize the variable 'cells' to silence this warning
    2125 |                 u32 id_base, phandle, cells, id_len, id_off;
         |                                            ^
         |                                             = 0
   1 warning generated.


vim +2144 drivers/of/base.c

  2065	
  2066	/**
  2067	 * of_map_id - Translate an ID through a downstream mapping.
  2068	 * @np: root complex device node.
  2069	 * @id: device ID to map.
  2070	 * @map_name: property name of the map to use.
  2071	 * @cells_name: property name of target specifier cells.
  2072	 * @map_mask_name: optional property name of the mask to use.
  2073	 * @arg: contains the optional params, @target which is a pointer
  2074	 *	to the target device node and id_out which is a pointer
  2075	 *	to receive the translated ID.
  2076	 *
  2077	 * Given a device ID, look up the appropriate implementation-defined
  2078	 * platform ID and/or the target device which receives transactions on that
  2079	 * ID, as per the "iommu-map" and "msi-map" bindings. Either of @target or
  2080	 * @id_out may be NULL if only the other is required. If @target points to
  2081	 * a non-NULL device node pointer, only entries targeting that node will be
  2082	 * matched; if it points to a NULL value, it will receive the device node of
  2083	 * the first matching target phandle, with a reference held.
  2084	 *
  2085	 * Return: 0 on success or a standard error code on failure.
  2086	 */
  2087	int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id, const char *map_name,
  2088		      const char *cells_name, const char *map_mask_name,
  2089		      struct of_map_id_arg *arg)
  2090	{
  2091		u32 map_mask, masked_id;
  2092		int map_bytes, map_len, offset = 0;
  2093		bool bad_map = false;
  2094		const __be32 *map = NULL;
  2095	
  2096		if (!np || !map_name || !arg || (!arg->target && !arg->id_out))
  2097			return -EINVAL;
  2098	
  2099		map = of_get_property(np, map_name, &map_bytes);
  2100		if (!map) {
  2101			if (arg->target)
  2102				return -ENODEV;
  2103			/* Otherwise, no map implies no translation */
  2104			*arg->id_out = id;
  2105			return 0;
  2106		}
  2107	
  2108		if (map_bytes % sizeof(*map))
  2109			goto err_map_len;
  2110		map_len = map_bytes / sizeof(*map);
  2111	
  2112		/* The default is to select all bits. */
  2113		map_mask = 0xffffffff;
  2114	
  2115		/*
  2116		 * Can be overridden by "{iommu,msi}-map-mask" property.
  2117		 * If of_property_read_u32() fails, the default is used.
  2118		 */
  2119		if (map_mask_name)
  2120			of_property_read_u32(np, map_mask_name, &map_mask);
  2121	
  2122		masked_id = map_mask & id;
  2123		while (offset < map_len) {
  2124			struct device_node *phandle_node;
  2125			u32 id_base, phandle, cells, id_len, id_off;
  2126			const __be32 *out_base;
  2127	
  2128			if (map_len - offset < 2)
  2129				goto err_map_len;
  2130	
  2131			id_base = be32_to_cpup(map + offset);
  2132			if (id_base & ~map_mask) {
  2133				pr_err("%pOF: Invalid %s translation - %s (0x%x) ignores id-base (0x%x)\n",
  2134					np, map_name, map_mask_name,
  2135					map_mask, id_base);
  2136				return -EFAULT;
  2137			}
  2138	
  2139			phandle = be32_to_cpup(map + offset + 1);
  2140			phandle_node = of_find_node_by_phandle(phandle);
  2141			if (!phandle_node)
  2142				return -ENODEV;
  2143	
> 2144			if (!bad_map && of_property_read_u32(phandle_node, cells_name, &cells)) {

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki