From: Jérôme de Bretagne <jerome.debretagne@gmail.com>

Add the compatible for the Qualcomm X1-based Microsoft Surface Pro 11,
using its Denali codename.

Signed-off-by: Jérôme de Bretagne <jerome.debretagne@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dale Whinham <daleyo@gmail.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
index 18b5ed044f9f..e35e7764dd8b 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
@@ -1069,6 +1069,7 @@ properties:
               - hp,elitebook-ultra-g1q
               - hp,omnibook-x14
               - lenovo,yoga-slim7x
+              - microsoft,denali
               - microsoft,romulus13
               - microsoft,romulus15
               - qcom,x1e80100-crd
-- 
2.52.0

On 01/12/2025 02:14, Dale Whinham wrote:
> From: Jérôme de Bretagne <jerome.debretagne@gmail.com>
> 
> Add the compatible for the Qualcomm X1-based Microsoft Surface Pro 11,
> using its Denali codename.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jérôme de Bretagne <jerome.debretagne@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dale Whinham <daleyo@gmail.com>
> ---


Don't ask us to do the work twice. It is waste of time.

<form letter>
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.

If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions
of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch changed
significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is
"received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing
list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to repost
patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for
tags received on the version they apply.

Please read:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof

On Mon, 01 Dec 2025 01:14:42 +0000, Dale Whinham wrote:
> From: Jérôme de Bretagne <jerome.debretagne@gmail.com>
> 
> Add the compatible for the Qualcomm X1-based Microsoft Surface Pro 11,
> using its Denali codename.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jérôme de Bretagne <jerome.debretagne@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dale Whinham <daleyo@gmail.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 

My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch:

yamllint warnings/errors:

dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal-sensor.example.dtb: /example-0/soc/thermal-sensor@c263000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['qcom,sdm845-tsens', 'qcom,tsens-v2']
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal-sensor.example.dtb: /example-0/soc/thermal-sensor@c263000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['qcom,sdm845-tsens', 'qcom,tsens-v2']
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal-sensor.example.dtb: /example-0/soc/thermal-sensor@c265000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['qcom,sdm845-tsens', 'qcom,tsens-v2']
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal-sensor.example.dtb: /example-0/soc/thermal-sensor@c265000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['qcom,sdm845-tsens', 'qcom,tsens-v2']

doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):

See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20251201011457.17422-2-daleyo@gmail.com

The base for the series is generally the latest rc1. A different dependency
should be noted in *this* patch.

If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
date:

pip3 install dtschema --upgrade

Please check and re-submit after running the above command yourself. Note
that DT_SCHEMA_FILES can be set to your schema file to speed up checking
your schema. However, it must be unset to test all examples with your schema.