drivers/platform/x86/serial-multi-instantiate.c | 13 +++++++++---- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
The tas2781-hda supports multi-projects. In some projects, GpioInt() was
dropped due to no IRQ connection. See the example code below:
Device (SPKR)
{
Name (_ADR, One)
Name (_HID, "TXNW2781")
Method (_CRS, 0, NotSerialized)
{
Name (RBUF, ResourceTemplate ()
{
I2cSerialBusV2 (0x0038, ...)
I2cSerialBusV2 (0x0039, ...)
// GpioInt (Edge, ...) { 0x0000 }
//"GpioInt (...) {}" was commented out due to no IRQ connection.
})
Return (RBUF)
}
}
But in smi_i2c_probe(), smi_spi_probe() (serial-multi-instantiate.c), if
looking for IRQ by smi_get_irq() fails, it will return an error, will not add
new device, and cause smi_probe() to fail:
[ 2.356546] Serial bus multi instantiate pseudo device driver TXNW2781:00:
error -ENXIO: IRQ index 0 not found
[ 2.356561] Serial bus multi instantiate pseudo device driver TXNW2781:00:
error -ENXIO: Error requesting irq at index 0
So, we need to add an exception case for these situations. BTW, this patch
will take effect on both I2C and SPI devices.
Signed-off-by: Baojun Xu <baojun.xu@ti.com>
---
v5:
- Change the description for this patch, remove cover letter.
v4:
- Change the description for this patch.
v3:
- Add IRQ_RESOURCE_OPT for IRQ missing cases.
v2:
- Remove error ignore, change to AUTO compatible with NONE.
---
drivers/platform/x86/serial-multi-instantiate.c | 13 +++++++++----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/serial-multi-instantiate.c b/drivers/platform/x86/serial-multi-instantiate.c
index db030b0f176a..1a369334f9cb 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/serial-multi-instantiate.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/serial-multi-instantiate.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
#define IRQ_RESOURCE_GPIO 1
#define IRQ_RESOURCE_APIC 2
#define IRQ_RESOURCE_AUTO 3
+#define IRQ_RESOURCE_OPT BIT(2)
enum smi_bus_type {
SMI_I2C,
@@ -64,6 +65,10 @@ static int smi_get_irq(struct platform_device *pdev, struct acpi_device *adev,
dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Using platform irq\n");
break;
}
+ if (inst->flags & IRQ_RESOURCE_OPT) {
+ dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "No irq\n");
+ return 0;
+ }
break;
case IRQ_RESOURCE_GPIO:
ret = acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get(adev, inst->irq_idx);
@@ -386,10 +391,10 @@ static const struct smi_node cs35l57_hda = {
static const struct smi_node tas2781_hda = {
.instances = {
- { "tas2781-hda", IRQ_RESOURCE_AUTO, 0 },
- { "tas2781-hda", IRQ_RESOURCE_AUTO, 0 },
- { "tas2781-hda", IRQ_RESOURCE_AUTO, 0 },
- { "tas2781-hda", IRQ_RESOURCE_AUTO, 0 },
+ { "tas2781-hda", IRQ_RESOURCE_AUTO | IRQ_RESOURCE_OPT, 0 },
+ { "tas2781-hda", IRQ_RESOURCE_AUTO | IRQ_RESOURCE_OPT, 0 },
+ { "tas2781-hda", IRQ_RESOURCE_AUTO | IRQ_RESOURCE_OPT, 0 },
+ { "tas2781-hda", IRQ_RESOURCE_AUTO | IRQ_RESOURCE_OPT, 0 },
{}
},
.bus_type = SMI_AUTO_DETECT,
--
2.25.1
On Wed, 26 Nov 2025 22:14:33 +0800, Baojun Xu wrote:
> The tas2781-hda supports multi-projects. In some projects, GpioInt() was
> dropped due to no IRQ connection. See the example code below:
>
> Device (SPKR)
> {
> Name (_ADR, One)
> Name (_HID, "TXNW2781")
> Method (_CRS, 0, NotSerialized)
> {
> Name (RBUF, ResourceTemplate ()
> {
> I2cSerialBusV2 (0x0038, ...)
> I2cSerialBusV2 (0x0039, ...)
> // GpioInt (Edge, ...) { 0x0000 }
> //"GpioInt (...) {}" was commented out due to no IRQ connection.
> })
> Return (RBUF)
> }
> }
>
> [...]
Thank you for your contribution, it has been applied to my local
review-ilpo-next branch. Note it will show up in the public
platform-drivers-x86/review-ilpo-next branch only once I've pushed my
local branch there, which might take a while.
The list of commits applied:
[1/1] platform/x86: serial-multi-instantiate: Add IRQ_RESOURCE_OPT for IRQ missing projects
commit: 1d1b8b0734af5149946e687415bf6be05ae55bd6
--
i.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 10:14:33PM +0800, Baojun Xu wrote:
> The tas2781-hda supports multi-projects. In some projects, GpioInt() was
> dropped due to no IRQ connection. See the example code below:
>
> Device (SPKR)
> {
> Name (_ADR, One)
> Name (_HID, "TXNW2781")
> Method (_CRS, 0, NotSerialized)
> {
> Name (RBUF, ResourceTemplate ()
> {
> I2cSerialBusV2 (0x0038, ...)
> I2cSerialBusV2 (0x0039, ...)
> // GpioInt (Edge, ...) { 0x0000 }
> //"GpioInt (...) {}" was commented out due to no IRQ connection.
> })
> Return (RBUF)
> }
> }
>
> But in smi_i2c_probe(), smi_spi_probe() (serial-multi-instantiate.c), if
> looking for IRQ by smi_get_irq() fails, it will return an error, will not add
> new device, and cause smi_probe() to fail:
>
> [ 2.356546] Serial bus multi instantiate pseudo device driver TXNW2781:00:
> error -ENXIO: IRQ index 0 not found
> [ 2.356561] Serial bus multi instantiate pseudo device driver TXNW2781:00:
> error -ENXIO: Error requesting irq at index 0
>
> So, we need to add an exception case for these situations. BTW, this patch
> will take effect on both I2C and SPI devices.
Thanks, excellent!
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Hi,
On 26-Nov-25 3:14 PM, Baojun Xu wrote:
> The tas2781-hda supports multi-projects. In some projects, GpioInt() was
> dropped due to no IRQ connection. See the example code below:
>
> Device (SPKR)
> {
> Name (_ADR, One)
> Name (_HID, "TXNW2781")
> Method (_CRS, 0, NotSerialized)
> {
> Name (RBUF, ResourceTemplate ()
> {
> I2cSerialBusV2 (0x0038, ...)
> I2cSerialBusV2 (0x0039, ...)
> // GpioInt (Edge, ...) { 0x0000 }
> //"GpioInt (...) {}" was commented out due to no IRQ connection.
> })
> Return (RBUF)
> }
> }
>
> But in smi_i2c_probe(), smi_spi_probe() (serial-multi-instantiate.c), if
> looking for IRQ by smi_get_irq() fails, it will return an error, will not add
> new device, and cause smi_probe() to fail:
>
> [ 2.356546] Serial bus multi instantiate pseudo device driver TXNW2781:00:
> error -ENXIO: IRQ index 0 not found
> [ 2.356561] Serial bus multi instantiate pseudo device driver TXNW2781:00:
> error -ENXIO: Error requesting irq at index 0
>
> So, we need to add an exception case for these situations. BTW, this patch
> will take effect on both I2C and SPI devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baojun Xu <baojun.xu@ti.com>
Thanks, patch looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <johannes.goede@oss.qualcomm.com>
Regards,
Hans
> ---
> v5:
> - Change the description for this patch, remove cover letter.
> v4:
> - Change the description for this patch.
> v3:
> - Add IRQ_RESOURCE_OPT for IRQ missing cases.
> v2:
> - Remove error ignore, change to AUTO compatible with NONE.
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/serial-multi-instantiate.c | 13 +++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/serial-multi-instantiate.c b/drivers/platform/x86/serial-multi-instantiate.c
> index db030b0f176a..1a369334f9cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/serial-multi-instantiate.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/serial-multi-instantiate.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> #define IRQ_RESOURCE_GPIO 1
> #define IRQ_RESOURCE_APIC 2
> #define IRQ_RESOURCE_AUTO 3
> +#define IRQ_RESOURCE_OPT BIT(2)
>
> enum smi_bus_type {
> SMI_I2C,
> @@ -64,6 +65,10 @@ static int smi_get_irq(struct platform_device *pdev, struct acpi_device *adev,
> dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Using platform irq\n");
> break;
> }
> + if (inst->flags & IRQ_RESOURCE_OPT) {
> + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "No irq\n");
> + return 0;
> + }
> break;
> case IRQ_RESOURCE_GPIO:
> ret = acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get(adev, inst->irq_idx);
> @@ -386,10 +391,10 @@ static const struct smi_node cs35l57_hda = {
>
> static const struct smi_node tas2781_hda = {
> .instances = {
> - { "tas2781-hda", IRQ_RESOURCE_AUTO, 0 },
> - { "tas2781-hda", IRQ_RESOURCE_AUTO, 0 },
> - { "tas2781-hda", IRQ_RESOURCE_AUTO, 0 },
> - { "tas2781-hda", IRQ_RESOURCE_AUTO, 0 },
> + { "tas2781-hda", IRQ_RESOURCE_AUTO | IRQ_RESOURCE_OPT, 0 },
> + { "tas2781-hda", IRQ_RESOURCE_AUTO | IRQ_RESOURCE_OPT, 0 },
> + { "tas2781-hda", IRQ_RESOURCE_AUTO | IRQ_RESOURCE_OPT, 0 },
> + { "tas2781-hda", IRQ_RESOURCE_AUTO | IRQ_RESOURCE_OPT, 0 },
> {}
> },
> .bus_type = SMI_AUTO_DETECT,
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.