[PATCH v2 02/10] dt-bindings: display/msm: dsi-phy-7nm: Add Kaanapali DSI PHY

yuanjie yang posted 10 patches 6 days, 17 hours ago
[PATCH v2 02/10] dt-bindings: display/msm: dsi-phy-7nm: Add Kaanapali DSI PHY
Posted by yuanjie yang 6 days, 17 hours ago
From: Yuanjie Yang <yuanjie.yang@oss.qualcomm.com>

The DSI PHY registers on the Kaanapali platform differ from those
on SM8750. So add DSI PHY for Kaanapali to compatible these changes.

Signed-off-by: Yuanjie Yang <yuanjie.yang@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml
index 1ca820a500b7..a6e044eed3df 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ properties:
     enum:
       - qcom,dsi-phy-7nm
       - qcom,dsi-phy-7nm-8150
+      - qcom,kaanapali-dsi-phy-3nm
       - qcom,sa8775p-dsi-phy-5nm
       - qcom,sar2130p-dsi-phy-5nm
       - qcom,sc7280-dsi-phy-7nm
-- 
2.34.1
Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] dt-bindings: display/msm: dsi-phy-7nm: Add Kaanapali DSI PHY
Posted by Krzysztof Kozlowski 6 days, 16 hours ago
On 25/11/2025 07:47, yuanjie yang wrote:
> From: Yuanjie Yang <yuanjie.yang@oss.qualcomm.com>
> 
> The DSI PHY registers on the Kaanapali platform differ from those
> on SM8750. So add DSI PHY for Kaanapali to compatible these changes.
> 


Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older
kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base
your patches on recent Linux kernel.

Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of
people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some
ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline) or work on fork of kernel
(don't, instead use mainline). Just use b4 and everything should be
fine, although remember about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new
patches to the patchset.

You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more), so this won't be
tested by automated tooling. Performing review on untested code might be
a waste of time.

Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries.


Best regards,
Krzysztof