These two patches address the issue reported by Juri [1] (thanks!).

The first removes an unnecessary comment, the second is the actual fix.

@Tejun, while these could be squashed together, I kept them separate to
maintain the one-patch-one-purpose rule. let me know if you'd like me to
resend these in a different format, or feel free to adjust as needed.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/aSBjm3mN_uIy64nz@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb

Pingfan Liu (2):
  sched/deadline: Remove unnecessary comment in
    dl_add_task_root_domain()
  sched/deadline: Fix potential race in dl_add_task_root_domain()

 kernel/sched/deadline.c | 12 ++----------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

-- 
2.49.0

On 11/24/25 10:26 PM, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> These two patches address the issue reported by Juri [1] (thanks!).
>
> The first removes an unnecessary comment, the second is the actual fix.
>
> @Tejun, while these could be squashed together, I kept them separate to
> maintain the one-patch-one-purpose rule. let me know if you'd like me to
> resend these in a different format, or feel free to adjust as needed.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/aSBjm3mN_uIy64nz@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb
>
> Pingfan Liu (2):
>    sched/deadline: Remove unnecessary comment in
>      dl_add_task_root_domain()
>    sched/deadline: Fix potential race in dl_add_task_root_domain()
>
>   kernel/sched/deadline.c | 12 ++----------
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
For the patch series,

Acked-by:  Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>

Hi,

On 25/11/25 11:26, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> These two patches address the issue reported by Juri [1] (thanks!).
> 
> The first removes an unnecessary comment, the second is the actual fix.
> 
> @Tejun, while these could be squashed together, I kept them separate to
> maintain the one-patch-one-purpose rule. let me know if you'd like me to
> resend these in a different format, or feel free to adjust as needed.
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/aSBjm3mN_uIy64nz@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb
> 
> Pingfan Liu (2):
>   sched/deadline: Remove unnecessary comment in
>     dl_add_task_root_domain()
>   sched/deadline: Fix potential race in dl_add_task_root_domain()
> 
>  kernel/sched/deadline.c | 12 ++----------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

For both

Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>

Thanks!
Juri

On 11/25/25 3:14 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 25/11/25 11:26, Pingfan Liu wrote:
>> These two patches address the issue reported by Juri [1] (thanks!).
>>
>> The first removes an unnecessary comment, the second is the actual fix.
>>
>> @Tejun, while these could be squashed together, I kept them separate to
>> maintain the one-patch-one-purpose rule. let me know if you'd like me to
>> resend these in a different format, or feel free to adjust as needed.
>>
>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/aSBjm3mN_uIy64nz@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb
>>
>> Pingfan Liu (2):
>>    sched/deadline: Remove unnecessary comment in
>>      dl_add_task_root_domain()
>>    sched/deadline: Fix potential race in dl_add_task_root_domain()
>>
>>   kernel/sched/deadline.c | 12 ++----------
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> For both
>
> Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>

Peter,

Are these 2 patches eligible to be merged into the the scheduler branch 
of the tip tree? These are bug fixes to the deadline scheduler code.

Cheers,
Longman

On Wed, Jan 07, 2026 at 02:57:00PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
> 
> On 11/25/25 3:14 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On 25/11/25 11:26, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> > > These two patches address the issue reported by Juri [1] (thanks!).
> > > 
> > > The first removes an unnecessary comment, the second is the actual fix.
> > > 
> > > @Tejun, while these could be squashed together, I kept them separate to
> > > maintain the one-patch-one-purpose rule. let me know if you'd like me to
> > > resend these in a different format, or feel free to adjust as needed.
> > > 
> > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/aSBjm3mN_uIy64nz@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb
> > > 
> > > Pingfan Liu (2):
> > >    sched/deadline: Remove unnecessary comment in
> > >      dl_add_task_root_domain()
> > >    sched/deadline: Fix potential race in dl_add_task_root_domain()
> > > 
> > >   kernel/sched/deadline.c | 12 ++----------
> > >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > For both
> > 
> > Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
> 
> Peter,
> 
> Are these 2 patches eligible to be merged into the the scheduler branch of
> the tip tree? These are bug fixes to the deadline scheduler code.

Thanks for the ping -- just to double check, I need to take the v2
patches, that are posted inside the v7 thread?

I mean; I absolutely detest posting new series in the same thread as an
older series and then you go and do non-linear versioning just to make
it absolutely impossible to tell what's what. :-(

On Thu, Jan 8, 2026 at 7:42 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2026 at 02:57:00PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
> >
> > On 11/25/25 3:14 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 25/11/25 11:26, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> > > > These two patches address the issue reported by Juri [1] (thanks!).
> > > >
> > > > The first removes an unnecessary comment, the second is the actual fix.
> > > >
> > > > @Tejun, while these could be squashed together, I kept them separate to
> > > > maintain the one-patch-one-purpose rule. let me know if you'd like me to
> > > > resend these in a different format, or feel free to adjust as needed.
> > > >
> > > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/aSBjm3mN_uIy64nz@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb
> > > >
> > > > Pingfan Liu (2):
> > > >    sched/deadline: Remove unnecessary comment in
> > > >      dl_add_task_root_domain()
> > > >    sched/deadline: Fix potential race in dl_add_task_root_domain()
> > > >
> > > >   kernel/sched/deadline.c | 12 ++----------
> > > >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > > For both
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
> >
> > Peter,
> >
> > Are these 2 patches eligible to be merged into the the scheduler branch of
> > the tip tree? These are bug fixes to the deadline scheduler code.
>
> Thanks for the ping -- just to double check, I need to take the v2
> patches, that are posted inside the v7 thread?
>

Sorry for the confusion. The two fixes in v2 are actually intended to
address the issue in patch [2/2] of v7.

> I mean; I absolutely detest posting new series in the same thread as an
> older series and then you go and do non-linear versioning just to make
> it absolutely impossible to tell what's what. :-(
>

I will use reference format in future. Again, sorry for the confusion.

Best Regards,

Pingfan