The spelling of the word "successfull" is incorrect; it should be "successful".

Signed-off-by: Chu Guangqing <chuguangqing@inspur.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/x86/lpss.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/x86/lpss.c b/drivers/acpi/x86/lpss.c
index 6daa6372f980..1dcb80ab0d23 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/x86/lpss.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/x86/lpss.c
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ static void byt_i2c_setup(struct lpss_private_data *pdata)
 	acpi_status status;
 	u64 uid;
 
-	/* Expected to always be successfull, but better safe then sorry */
+	/* Expected to always be successful, but better safe then sorry */
 	if (!acpi_dev_uid_to_integer(pdata->adev, &uid) && uid) {
 		/* Detect I2C bus shared with PUNIT and ignore its d3 status */
 		status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_SEM", NULL, &shared_host);
-- 
2.43.7

On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 3:14 AM Chu Guangqing <chuguangqing@inspur.com> wrote:
>
> The spelling of the word "successfull" is incorrect; it should be "successful".
>
> Signed-off-by: Chu Guangqing <chuguangqing@inspur.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/x86/lpss.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/x86/lpss.c b/drivers/acpi/x86/lpss.c
> index 6daa6372f980..1dcb80ab0d23 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/x86/lpss.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/x86/lpss.c
> @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ static void byt_i2c_setup(struct lpss_private_data *pdata)
>         acpi_status status;
>         u64 uid;
>
> -       /* Expected to always be successfull, but better safe then sorry */
> +       /* Expected to always be successful, but better safe then sorry */
>         if (!acpi_dev_uid_to_integer(pdata->adev, &uid) && uid) {
>                 /* Detect I2C bus shared with PUNIT and ignore its d3 status */
>                 status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_SEM", NULL, &shared_host);
> --

Applied as 6.19 material, thanks!