1. Patchew
  2. linux
  3. View series

[net-next v2] dt-bindings: can: mpfs: document resets

Conor Dooley posted 1 patch 1 week, 3 days ago 
.../devicetree/bindings/net/can/microchip,mpfs-can.yaml      | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
[net-next v2] dt-bindings: can: mpfs: document resets
Posted by Conor Dooley 1 week, 3 days ago 
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

The CAN cores on Polarfire SoC both have a reset. The platform firmware
brings both cores out of reset, but the linux driver must use them
during normal operation. The resets should have been made required, but
this is one of the things that can happen when the binding is written
without driver support.

Fixes: c878d518d7b6 ("dt-bindings: can: mpfs: document the mpfs CAN controller")
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
---
This is the second mistake in this binding, both spotted because of the
driver being written (although this one sat downstream for a while for
w/e reason). I wish I could say that I'd send the driver soon, but I am
busy upstreaming things I wrote and therefore understand at the moment,
so a driver that I'd have to go understand and review before sending is
low priority, sorry!

v2: update the example too...

CC: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
CC: Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@microchip.com>
CC: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
CC: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol@kernel.org>
CC: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>
CC: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
CC: linux-can@vger.kernel.org
CC: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/net/can/microchip,mpfs-can.yaml      | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/microchip,mpfs-can.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/microchip,mpfs-can.yaml
index 1219c5cb601f..519a11fbe972 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/microchip,mpfs-can.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/microchip,mpfs-can.yaml
@@ -32,11 +32,15 @@ properties:
       - description: AHB peripheral clock
       - description: CAN bus clock
 
+  resets:
+    maxItems: 1
+
 required:
   - compatible
   - reg
   - interrupts
   - clocks
+  - resets
 
 additionalProperties: false
 
@@ -46,6 +50,7 @@ examples:
         compatible = "microchip,mpfs-can";
         reg = <0x2010c000 0x1000>;
         clocks = <&clkcfg 17>, <&clkcfg 37>;
+        resets = <&clkcfg 17>;
         interrupt-parent = <&plic>;
         interrupts = <56>;
     };
-- 
2.51.0
Re: [net-next v2] dt-bindings: can: mpfs: document resets
Posted by Krzysztof Kozlowski 5 days, 14 hours ago 
On 21/11/2025 14:42, Conor Dooley wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> 
> The CAN cores on Polarfire SoC both have a reset. The platform firmware
> brings both cores out of reset, but the linux driver must use them
> during normal operation. The resets should have been made required, but
> this is one of the things that can happen when the binding is written
> without driver support.
> 
> Fixes: c878d518d7b6 ("dt-bindings: can: mpfs: document the mpfs CAN controller")
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> ---

FWIW, if you insist:

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Re: [net-next v2] dt-bindings: can: mpfs: document resets
Posted by Marc Kleine-Budde 5 days, 14 hours ago 
Hello,

can I get a review from the DT people?

regards,
Marc

On 21.11.2025 13:42:30, Conor Dooley wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
>
> The CAN cores on Polarfire SoC both have a reset. The platform firmware
> brings both cores out of reset, but the linux driver must use them
> during normal operation. The resets should have been made required, but
> this is one of the things that can happen when the binding is written
> without driver support.
>
> Fixes: c878d518d7b6 ("dt-bindings: can: mpfs: document the mpfs CAN controller")
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> ---
> This is the second mistake in this binding, both spotted because of the
> driver being written (although this one sat downstream for a while for
> w/e reason). I wish I could say that I'd send the driver soon, but I am
> busy upstreaming things I wrote and therefore understand at the moment,
> so a driver that I'd have to go understand and review before sending is
> low priority, sorry!
>
> v2: update the example too...
>
> CC: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> CC: Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@microchip.com>
> CC: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
> CC: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol@kernel.org>
> CC: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>
> CC: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> CC: linux-can@vger.kernel.org
> CC: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
> CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/net/can/microchip,mpfs-can.yaml      | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/microchip,mpfs-can.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/microchip,mpfs-can.yaml
> index 1219c5cb601f..519a11fbe972 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/microchip,mpfs-can.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/microchip,mpfs-can.yaml
> @@ -32,11 +32,15 @@ properties:
>        - description: AHB peripheral clock
>        - description: CAN bus clock
>
> +  resets:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
>  required:
>    - compatible
>    - reg
>    - interrupts
>    - clocks
> +  - resets
>
>  additionalProperties: false
>
> @@ -46,6 +50,7 @@ examples:
>          compatible = "microchip,mpfs-can";
>          reg = <0x2010c000 0x1000>;
>          clocks = <&clkcfg 17>, <&clkcfg 37>;
> +        resets = <&clkcfg 17>;
>          interrupt-parent = <&plic>;
>          interrupts = <56>;
>      };
> --
> 2.51.0
>
>
>

--
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde          |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung Nürnberg              | Phone: +49-5121-206917-129 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-9   |
Re: [net-next v2] dt-bindings: can: mpfs: document resets
Posted by Krzysztof Kozlowski 5 days, 14 hours ago 
On 26/11/2025 11:24, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> can I get a review from the DT people?

We don't always review each other patches, so you kind of have DT review
already. I can review, but I just did not plan to review this... less
work needed...

> 
> regards,
> Marc
> 
> On 21.11.2025 13:42:30, Conor Dooley wrote:
>> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
>>
>> The CAN cores on Polarfire SoC both have a reset. The platform firmware
>> brings both cores out of reset, but the linux driver must use them
>> during normal operation. The resets should have been made required, but
>> this is one of the things that can happen when the binding is written
>> without driver support.
>>
>> Fixes: c878d518d7b6 ("dt-bindings: can: mpfs: document the mpfs CAN controller")
>> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
>> ---
>> This is the second mistake in this binding, both spotted because of the
>> driver being written (although this one sat downstream for a while for
>> w/e reason). I wish I could say that I'd send the driver soon, but I am
>> busy upstreaming things I wrote and therefore understand at the moment,
>> so a driver that I'd have to go understand and review before sending is
>> low priority, sorry!
>>
>> v2: update the example too...
>>
>> CC: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
>> CC: Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@microchip.com>
>> CC: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
>> CC: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol@kernel.org>
>> CC: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
>> CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>
>> CC: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
>> CC: linux-can@vger.kernel.org
>> CC: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
>> CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/net/can/microchip,mpfs-can.yaml      | 5 +++++
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/microchip,mpfs-can.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/microchip,mpfs-can.yaml
>> index 1219c5cb601f..519a11fbe972 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/microchip,mpfs-can.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/microchip,mpfs-can.yaml
>> @@ -32,11 +32,15 @@ properties:
>>        - description: AHB peripheral clock
>>        - description: CAN bus clock
>>
>> +  resets:
>> +    maxItems: 1
>> +
>>  required:
>>    - compatible
>>    - reg
>>    - interrupts
>>    - clocks
>> +  - resets
>>
>>  additionalProperties: false
>>
>> @@ -46,6 +50,7 @@ examples:
>>          compatible = "microchip,mpfs-can";
>>          reg = <0x2010c000 0x1000>;
>>          clocks = <&clkcfg 17>, <&clkcfg 37>;
>> +        resets = <&clkcfg 17>;
>>          interrupt-parent = <&plic>;
>>          interrupts = <56>;
>>      };
>> --
>> 2.51.0
>>
>>
>>
> 
> --
> Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde          |
> Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de |
> Vertretung Nürnberg              | Phone: +49-5121-206917-129 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-9   |


Best regards,
Krzysztof
Re: [net-next v2] dt-bindings: can: mpfs: document resets
Posted by Conor Dooley 5 days, 6 hours ago 
On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 11:26:17AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 26/11/2025 11:24, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > can I get a review from the DT people?
> 
> We don't always review each other patches, so you kind of have DT review
> already. I can review, but I just did not plan to review this... less
> work needed...

I think it was a pretty reasonable ask here, because the v1 had a
problem.
Re: [net-next v2] dt-bindings: can: mpfs: document resets
Posted by Marc Kleine-Budde 5 days, 14 hours ago 
On 26.11.2025 11:26:17, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 26/11/2025 11:24, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > can I get a review from the DT people?
>
> We don't always review each other patches, so you kind of have DT review
> already. I can review, but I just did not plan to review this... less
> work needed...

Thanks for the quick reply and review.

regards,
Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde          |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung Nürnberg              | Phone: +49-5121-206917-129 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-9   |

Patchew 2.1-devel-b67e4c2

© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.