drivers/mfd/sec-common.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- drivers/mfd/sec-core.h | 2 +- drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------- drivers/rtc/rtc-s5m.c | 21 +++++--------- include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h | 1 - 5 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
Hi,
With the attached patches the Samsung s5m RTC driver is simplified a
little bit with regards to alarm IRQ acquisition.
The end result is that instead of having a list of IRQ numbers for each
variant (and a BUILD_BUG_ON() to ensure consistency), the RTC driver
queries the 'alarm' platform resource from the parent (mfd cell).
Additionally, we can drop a now-useless field from runtime data,
reducing memory consumption slightly.
The attached patches must be applied in-order as patch 2 without 1 will
fail at runtime, and patch 3 without 2 will fail at build time. I would
expect them all to go via the MFD tree. Alternatively, they could be
applied individually to the respective kernel trees during multiple
kernel release cycles, but that seems a needless complication and
delay.
Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@linaro.org>
---
Changes in v2:
- rebase on top of https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251114-s2mpg10-chained-irq-v1-1-34ddfa49c4cd@linaro.org
- return struct regmap_irq_chip_data * in sec_irq_init() (Lee)
- collect tags
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251114-s5m-alarm-v1-0-c9b3bebae65f@linaro.org
---
André Draszik (3):
mfd: sec: add rtc alarm IRQ as platform device resource
rtc: s5m: query platform device IRQ resource for alarm IRQ
mfd: sec: drop now unused struct sec_pmic_dev::irq_data
drivers/mfd/sec-common.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
drivers/mfd/sec-core.h | 2 +-
drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++----------------------
drivers/rtc/rtc-s5m.c | 21 +++++---------
include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h | 1 -
5 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 9ad5de6d54f306b2bbf7ceb27e67a60c58a71224
change-id: 20251114-s5m-alarm-3de705ea53ce
Best regards,
--
André Draszik <andre.draszik@linaro.org>
On Thu, 20 Nov 2025, André Draszik wrote: > Hi, > > With the attached patches the Samsung s5m RTC driver is simplified a > little bit with regards to alarm IRQ acquisition. > > The end result is that instead of having a list of IRQ numbers for each > variant (and a BUILD_BUG_ON() to ensure consistency), the RTC driver > queries the 'alarm' platform resource from the parent (mfd cell). > > Additionally, we can drop a now-useless field from runtime data, > reducing memory consumption slightly. > > The attached patches must be applied in-order as patch 2 without 1 will > fail at runtime, and patch 3 without 2 will fail at build time. I would > expect them all to go via the MFD tree. Alternatively, they could be > applied individually to the respective kernel trees during multiple > kernel release cycles, but that seems a needless complication and > delay. > > Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@linaro.org> > --- > Changes in v2: > - rebase on top of https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251114-s2mpg10-chained-irq-v1-1-34ddfa49c4cd@linaro.org > - return struct regmap_irq_chip_data * in sec_irq_init() (Lee) > - collect tags > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251114-s5m-alarm-v1-0-c9b3bebae65f@linaro.org > > --- > André Draszik (3): > mfd: sec: add rtc alarm IRQ as platform device resource > rtc: s5m: query platform device IRQ resource for alarm IRQ > mfd: sec: drop now unused struct sec_pmic_dev::irq_data > > drivers/mfd/sec-common.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- > drivers/mfd/sec-core.h | 2 +- > drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------- > drivers/rtc/rtc-s5m.c | 21 +++++--------- > include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h | 1 - > 5 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-) The MFD parts look okay to me. Once we have the RTC Ack, I'll merge this and send out a PR. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]
On Wed, 26 Nov 2025, Lee Jones wrote: > On Thu, 20 Nov 2025, André Draszik wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > With the attached patches the Samsung s5m RTC driver is simplified a > > little bit with regards to alarm IRQ acquisition. > > > > The end result is that instead of having a list of IRQ numbers for each > > variant (and a BUILD_BUG_ON() to ensure consistency), the RTC driver > > queries the 'alarm' platform resource from the parent (mfd cell). > > > > Additionally, we can drop a now-useless field from runtime data, > > reducing memory consumption slightly. > > > > The attached patches must be applied in-order as patch 2 without 1 will > > fail at runtime, and patch 3 without 2 will fail at build time. I would > > expect them all to go via the MFD tree. Alternatively, they could be > > applied individually to the respective kernel trees during multiple > > kernel release cycles, but that seems a needless complication and > > delay. > > > > Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@linaro.org> > > --- > > Changes in v2: > > - rebase on top of https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251114-s2mpg10-chained-irq-v1-1-34ddfa49c4cd@linaro.org > > - return struct regmap_irq_chip_data * in sec_irq_init() (Lee) > > - collect tags > > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251114-s5m-alarm-v1-0-c9b3bebae65f@linaro.org > > > > --- > > André Draszik (3): > > mfd: sec: add rtc alarm IRQ as platform device resource > > rtc: s5m: query platform device IRQ resource for alarm IRQ > > mfd: sec: drop now unused struct sec_pmic_dev::irq_data > > > > drivers/mfd/sec-common.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- > > drivers/mfd/sec-core.h | 2 +- > > drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------- > > drivers/rtc/rtc-s5m.c | 21 +++++--------- > > include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h | 1 - > > 5 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-) > > The MFD parts look okay to me. > > Once we have the RTC Ack, I'll merge this and send out a PR. Ah, I see it. Apologies. It's too late in the cycle to take this now anyway. It's on my radar for when -rc1 is released. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Hi Lee, On Wed, 2025-11-26 at 11:29 +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > On Thu, 20 Nov 2025, André Draszik wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > With the attached patches the Samsung s5m RTC driver is simplified a > > little bit with regards to alarm IRQ acquisition. > > > > The end result is that instead of having a list of IRQ numbers for each > > variant (and a BUILD_BUG_ON() to ensure consistency), the RTC driver > > queries the 'alarm' platform resource from the parent (mfd cell). > > > > Additionally, we can drop a now-useless field from runtime data, > > reducing memory consumption slightly. > > > > The attached patches must be applied in-order as patch 2 without 1 will > > fail at runtime, and patch 3 without 2 will fail at build time. I would > > expect them all to go via the MFD tree. Alternatively, they could be > > applied individually to the respective kernel trees during multiple > > kernel release cycles, but that seems a needless complication and > > delay. > > > > Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@linaro.org> > > --- > > Changes in v2: > > - rebase on top of https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251114-s2mpg10-chained-irq-v1-1-34ddfa49c4cd@linaro.org > > - return struct regmap_irq_chip_data * in sec_irq_init() (Lee) > > - collect tags > > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251114-s5m-alarm-v1-0-c9b3bebae65f@linaro.org > > > > --- > > André Draszik (3): > > mfd: sec: add rtc alarm IRQ as platform device resource > > rtc: s5m: query platform device IRQ resource for alarm IRQ > > mfd: sec: drop now unused struct sec_pmic_dev::irq_data > > > > drivers/mfd/sec-common.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- > > drivers/mfd/sec-core.h | 2 +- > > drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------- > > drivers/rtc/rtc-s5m.c | 21 +++++--------- > > include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h | 1 - > > 5 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-) > > The MFD parts look okay to me. > > Once we have the RTC Ack, I'll merge this and send out a PR. Thanks Lee. Alexandre kindly acked v1 in https://lore.kernel.org/all/2025111415582194c6ee16@mail.local/ and there was no change to the RTC part in v2 hence I collected it already. So should be good to go? Cheers, Andre'
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.