[PATCH] net: ipv4: fix spelling typo in comment

Shi Hao posted 1 patch 1 week, 5 days ago
net/ipv4/tcp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
[PATCH] net: ipv4: fix spelling typo in comment
Posted by Shi Hao 1 week, 5 days ago
Replace "splitted" with "split" in comment.

Signed-off-by: Shi Hao <i.shihao.999@gmail.com>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index 8a18aeca7ab0..0d1c8e805d24 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -1600,7 +1600,7 @@ struct sk_buff *tcp_recv_skb(struct sock *sk, u32 seq, u32 *off)
 			return skb;
 		}
 		/* This looks weird, but this can happen if TCP collapsing
-		 * splitted a fat GRO packet, while we released socket lock
+		 * split a fat GRO packet, while we released socket lock
 		 * in skb_splice_bits()
 		 */
 		tcp_eat_recv_skb(sk, skb);
--
2.51.0
Re: [PATCH] net: ipv4: fix spelling typo in comment
Posted by Jason Xing 1 week, 5 days ago
On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 1:30 AM Shi Hao <i.shihao.999@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Replace "splitted" with "split" in comment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shi Hao <i.shihao.999@gmail.com>

I think minor typo patches regarding networking should be squashed
into one as they are easier to review at one time.

Please repost them as one after ~24 hours.

Thanks,
Jason
Re: [PATCH] net: ipv4: fix spelling typo in comment
Posted by ShiHao 1 week, 2 days ago
On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 09:53:50AM +0800, Jason Xing wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 1:30 AM Shi Hao <i.shihao.999@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think minor typo patches regarding networking should be squashed
> into one as they are easier to review at one time.
>
> Please repost them as one after ~24 hours.
>
> Thanks,
> Jasoni

Hi everyone.I recently sent a second patch for most of the spelling typos
which were in the net/ipv4/ directory and combined them all into this second
patch however there are also spelling typos in the net/ipv6 directory too
should i combine this new directory fixes  with the previous one? or should
i just send a new separate patch for the ipv6 directory. I am new to this
so any guidance would be greatly appreciated .


Thanks