WSEN-tids only has an i2c interface and an optional interrupt. This
should qualify the sensor as trivial device.

WSEN is a subcompany of Würth Electronics specialized on IC sensors.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Marangoni <Thomas.Marangoni@becom-group.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trivial-devices.yaml | 2 ++
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml | 2 ++
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trivial-devices.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trivial-devices.yaml
index 2eff6f274302..0a6b687552c8 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trivial-devices.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trivial-devices.yaml
@@ -488,6 +488,8 @@ properties:
           - ti,tsc2003
             # Winbond/Nuvoton H/W Monitor
           - winbond,w83793
+            # Würth temperature sensor with i2c interface
+          - wsen,tids
 
 required:
   - compatible
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
index 42d2bc0ce027..ef527e980137 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
@@ -1787,6 +1787,8 @@ patternProperties:
     description: Würth Elektronik GmbH.
   "^welltech,.*":
     description: Welltech Computer Co., Limited.
+  "^wsen,.*":
+    description: Würth Elektronik eiSos GmbH & Co. KG
   "^wetek,.*":
     description: WeTek Electronics, limited.
   "^wexler,.*":
-- 
2.51.1

On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 01:51:38PM +0100, Thomas Marangoni wrote:
> WSEN-tids only has an i2c interface and an optional interrupt. This
> should qualify the sensor as trivial device.
> 
> WSEN is a subcompany of Würth Electronics specialized on IC sensors.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Marangoni <Thomas.Marangoni@becom-group.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trivial-devices.yaml | 2 ++
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml | 2 ++
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>

<form letter>
This is an automated instruction, just in case, because many review
tags are being ignored. If you know the process, just skip it entirely
(please do not feel offended by me posting it here - no bad intentions
intended, no patronizing, I just want to avoid wasted efforts). If you
do not know the process, here is a short explanation:

Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
versions of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless
patch changed significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT
bindings). Tag is "received", when provided in a message replied to you
on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help here ('b4 trailers -u ...').
However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The
upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the version they
apply.

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.15/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L591
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof