Please, disregard this v7. I misconfigured my email. I'm sorry about the noise.
--nX
On Tue, 18 Nov 2025 at 17:01, Daniel Vacek <neelx@suse.com> wrote:
>
> This is a revive of former work [1] of Omar, Sweet Tea and Josef to bring
> native encryption support to btrfs.
>
> It will come in more parts. The first part this time is splitting the simple
> and isolated stuff out first to reduce the size of the final patchset.
>
> Changes:
> * v7 - Drop the checksum patch for now. It will make more sense later.
> - Drop the btrfs/330 fix. It seems no longer needed after the years.
> * v6 vs v5 [1] is mostly rebase to the latest for-next and cleaning up the
> conflicts.
>
> The remaining part needs further cleanup and a bit of redesign and it will
> follow later.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/cover.1706116485.git.josef@toxicpanda.com/
>
> Josef Bacik (4):
> btrfs: add orig_logical to btrfs_bio
> btrfs: don't rewrite ret from inode_permission
> btrfs: move inode_to_path higher in backref.c
> btrfs: don't search back for dir inode item in INO_LOOKUP_USER
>
> Omar Sandoval (1):
> btrfs: disable various operations on encrypted inodes
>
> Sweet Tea Dorminy (1):
> btrfs: disable verity on encrypted inodes
>
> fs/btrfs/backref.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> fs/btrfs/bio.c | 10 +++++++
> fs/btrfs/bio.h | 2 ++
> fs/btrfs/file-item.c | 2 +-
> fs/btrfs/inode.c | 4 +++
> fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 27 +++---------------
> fs/btrfs/reflink.c | 7 +++++
> fs/btrfs/verity.c | 3 ++
> 8 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.51.0
>